Skip to content

Kentucky · Nonprofit

RIVER FIELDS INC

RIVER FIELDS INC (Kentucky) receives grants from 22 organizations whose IRS filings report $853,266 to it, the largest being OWSLEY BROWN II FAMILY FOUNDATION INC ($260,303). 16 of them have funded it in more than one year.

Revenue FY2024
$450k
Funders on record
22
Grants received
$853k
Net assets
$4.3M
16/22 repeat fundersgrants exceed reported revenue in one year
01What it does

What River Fields Inc does

Mission

River fields protects, preserves, and enhances the natural and cultural resources, including agricultural and scenic resources, on both sides of the ohio river between westport and west point, kentucky, for the benefit of the public.we believe the ohio river and its natural and cultural wonders belong to everyone. We serve as a trusted and impartial voice for sustainable, thoughtful planning that respects and nurtures our beautiful river and its lands. We use a combination of advocacy, conservation, and education to achieve our mission and vision, including:working with landowners to permanently protect 2,300 acres of forests, meadows, shorelines, and farms in the ohio river watershed in jefferson, shelby, and oldham countiescaring for 65 acres of beautiful and fragile river landscapes, for all to enjoyspeaking out against harmful, short-sighted developmentsharing hands-on nature education with a wide audience

As stated on its FY2024 Form 990.

Programs

On its FY2024 return the organization reported starting a significant new program.

Programming for teens in foster care, master plan for garvin brown nature preserve, engagement in new partnerships for ohio river stewardship

Its own explanation, from Schedule O of that return (Part III, line 2).

  1. Land conservation - this important program area focuses on the protection, mostly permanent, of natural and cultural resources including scenic and agricultural resources through voluntary conservation easements or purchase of land in fee simple. We work directly with interested landowners and citizens as they decide whether to execute conservation easements or donate their land. With almost 2,200 acres of farmland of cultural landscapes, wetlands, open space, river corridor and watershed properties now protected forever from unwise development, river fields provides a strong, clear voice for land conservation that is listened to throughout this region and beyond. We hold easement in three counties - jefferson, oldham, and shelby county all of which are in the ohio river watershed. We hold and monitor annually 19 conservation easements, seven of which are historic preservation and conservation easements held jointly with the ky heritage council, kentucky's agency for historic preservation. One major easement, the 400-acre shelby trails park, is open to the public year-round. Importantly, river fields also has 10 properties held in fee simple, most of which is open to the public.…

    $207,032 spent
    69% of program spending
  2. Education - encourage and empower all citizens to protect the river and its surrounding lands. Our largest email list allows us to communicate with any person who signs up. We send out educational information, alerts about public meetings and critical issues that impact the ohio river corridor. We accept every opportunity to train and educate the public, neighborhoods, and professional advisors to landowners. We offer annual educational events on protected lands, always led by a professional. River fields works closely with its members, governmental agencies, civic organizations and news media to strengthen the community involvement and knowledge about environmental issues and other important topics. We train regional citizens and leaders on the legal and professional operational elements of land conservation. We are particularly adept at educating citizens about the federal law, section 106 which helps stakeholders reduce, and mitigate negative impacts on historic properties from a federal undertaking.

    $48,570 spent
    16% of program spending
  3. Advocacy - river fields takes positions based only on the facts and the law. We seek creative solutions that promote protection and enhancement of natural, scenic historic and agricultural resources and open spaces. We promote planned development and growth management, greater public access, rational transportation decisions and good urban design. We are proud of our reputation as a willing negotiator in efforts to promote natural and historic, land conservation, preservation of environmentally sensitive land and wise water use. We always work toward the protection of clean air, soil, water, and historic neighborhoods. We are a lead non-profit in the preservation of historic african american resources which are so often ignored. For example, for over eight years, the neighborhood plan for an important historic african american neighborhood, which has state-wide significance, has been an advocacy priority. River fields funded the work of the center for neighborhoods, another partner, to lead that neighborhood plan. In 2020, the neighborhood plan was approved by the louisville metro council. The advocacy program covers decisions from countless local, state, and federal agencies. In…

    $39,205 spent
    13% of program spending
  4. Youth engagement: we work with a partner organization to provide free nature-based programming on our lands to teens in foster care, hoping to cultivate the next generation of environmental stewards. Partnerships: we work with the ohio river way and the ohio river basin alliance to advocate for large-scale ecological, recreational, cultural, and economic investment and restoration of the entire stretch of the ohio river.

    $7,000 spent
    2% of program spending

The 4 programs described on its FY2024 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $301,807.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($1.3M) Expenses 100 ($495k) Net assets 100 ($4.7M)2018 Revenue 6 ($82k) Expenses 86 ($424k) Net assets 90 ($4.2M)2019 Revenue 21 ($281k) Expenses 75 ($373k) Net assets 89 ($4.2M)2020 Revenue 23 ($304k) Expenses 70 ($349k) Net assets 90 ($4.2M)2021 Revenue 26 ($347k) Expenses 71 ($352k) Net assets 92 ($4.3M)2022 Revenue 25 ($331k) Expenses 67 ($333k) Net assets 88 ($4.1M)2023 Revenue 26 ($349k) Expenses 65 ($322k) Net assets 91 ($4.3M)2024 Revenue 34 ($450k) Expenses 93 ($459k) Net assets 92 ($4.3M)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Revenue (34)Expenses (93)Net assets (92)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2017 to 2018, from $4.9M to $4.4M (−11%).

$4.9M
$4.4M
$4.3M
$4.4M
$4.4M
$4.2M
$4.4M
$4.5M
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2021 10%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

98% of RIVER FIELDS INC’s revenue is contributions — more donation-reliant than the typical peer (88% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 4,639 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 6 of the last 8 reported years ran a deficit.

$845k
’17
−$342k
’18
−$92k
’19
−$44k
’20
−$4k
’21
−$2k
’22
$27k
’23
−$9k
’24
2.3
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Listed1614141313111112
Joined·+1+0+4+0+1+0+1
No longer listed·3050300
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 6 funders to 8 funders, grant income rose $24k → $85k.

3 of 22 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 28% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of RIVER FIELDS INC’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

RIVER FIELDS INC has a broad base — no single funder exceeds 31% of grant income, and it takes 3 funders to reach half.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 3 funders to its left

30% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund RIVER FIELDS INC.

31%
largest funder
63%
top three
~6
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 36% · 2018 44% · 2019 27% · 2020 85% · 2021 26% · 2022 36% · 2023 59% — growing more concentrated.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

46% of RIVER FIELDS INC's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 73% give in more than one year at all.

first grant+1y+2y+3y+4y+5y+6y

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

97% of RIVER FIELDS INC's grant income comes from Kentucky funders.

CO
KY
FL

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’17
’18
’19
’20
’21
’22
’23
Kentucky out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $242k arriving through sponsors registered in 1 state is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

RIVER FIELDS INC's funding base is broadening — from 6 funders to 8 as grant income climbed.

Operating margin−2% · below the median
Months of reserve2.3mo · bottom quartile
Revenue growth (annualized)−14% · bottom quartile

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 4,266 environment nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2024

Organizations like RIVER FIELDS INC

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Kentucky

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

66% of spending goes to programs.

Program 66%Management 21%Fundraising 13%

Governance

10
board members
100%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy✓Whistleblower policy✓Document retention–Board reviewed the 990–Audited financials

Public support

66%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

KY

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for RIVER FIELDS INC: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds RIVER FIELDS INC?
RIVER FIELDS INC (Kentucky) receives grants from 22 organizations whose IRS filings report $853,266 to it, the largest being OWSLEY BROWN II FAMILY FOUNDATION INC ($260,303). 16 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does RIVER FIELDS INC have?
IRS filings report 22 organizations giving $853,266 in grants to RIVER FIELDS INC, 16 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of RIVER FIELDS INC?
OWSLEY BROWN II FAMILY FOUNDATION INC is the largest funder on record, with $260,303 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like RIVER FIELDS INC find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Kentucky. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

Play a game about who funds River Fields →

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2017–2024), and the filings of 22 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 22, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing