Skip to content

· Public charity

Attorney General's Sexual Assault Task Force

Oregon satf's mission is to build, connect, and sustain survivor-centered systems to prevent sexual violence and advocate for equitable, trauma-informed responses across oregon.

$271k
Granted FY2025still arriving
4
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$92k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$947kCrime & Legal$939kYouth Development$279k
02FY2025 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k2 grants · $91k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $175k
$83,329
Median grant
1
States reached
$743k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE HARBOR INC$91,975
EL PROGRAMA HISPANO CATOLICO$83,329
SELF ENHANCEMENT INC$47,213
HENDERSON HOUSE$43,658
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $1.4M) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 89% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%CLACKAMAS WOMENS SERVICES: $63k → 8%HENDERSON HOUSE: $44k → 11%EL PROGRAMA HISPANO CATOLICO: $83k → 12%SHELTER FROM THE STORM: $7k → 15%HAVEN FROM DOMESTIC VIOLENCE: $63k → 16%WOMEN'S CRISIS SUPPORT: $68k → 18%CLACKAMAS WOMENS SERVICES: $43k → 8%HENDERSON HOUSE: $9k → 11%EL PROGRAMA HISPANO CATOLICO: $72k → 12%SHELTER FROM THE STORM: $6k → 15%HAVEN FROM DOMESTIC VIOLENCE: $56k → 16%WOMEN'S CRISIS SUPPORT: $54k → 18%CLACKAMAS WOMENS SERVICES: $38k → 8%EL PROGRAMA HISPANO CATOLICO: $63k → 12%Haven: $54k → 16%Women's Crisis Support: $53k → 18%CLACKAMAS WOMENS SERVICES: $14k → 8%EL PROGRAMA HISPANO CATOLICO: $58k → 12%HAVEN FROM DOMESTIC VIOLENCE: $52k → 16%WOMEN'S CRISIS SUPPORT: $53k → 18%EL PROGRAMA HISPANO CATOLICO: $55k → 12%HAVEN FROM DOMESTIC VIOLENCE: $49k → 16%WOMEN'S CRISIS SUPPORT: $48k → 18%EL PROGRAMA HISPANO CATOLICO: $55k → 12%HAVEN FROM DOMESTIC VIOLENCE: $41k → 16%WOMEN'S CRISIS SUPPORT: $32k → 18%EL PROGRAMA HISPANO CATOLICO: $54k → 12%HAVEN FROM DOMESTIC VIOLENCE: $34k → 16%WOMEN'S CRISIS SUPPORT: $25k → 18%HAVEN FROM DOMESTIC VIOLENCE: $18k → 16%WOMEN'S CRISIS SUPPORT: $21k → 18%EL PROGRAMA HISPANO CATOLICO: $49k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.1M · 10 repeat orgs$53k to everyone else

10 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
1

Total granted

$2.1M
$53k

Still filing today

90%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • EL PROGRAMA HISPANO CATOLICO
    8× · 2018–2025 · $488k · revenue +79%
  • HF
    HAVEN FROM DOMESTIC VIOLENCE
    8× · 2017–2024 · $367k · revenue +28%
  • WC
    WOMEN'S CRISIS SUPPORT TEAM
    8× · 2017–2024 · $354k · revenue +26%

Funded once

  • CC
    CATHOLIC CHARITIES
    one grant, 2017 · $53k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Capital Area Family Violence Intervention Center Inc

To end domestic violence in the capital area through serving victims of domestic violence, educating the public about domestic violence, and working to eliminate economic, social and cultural conditions and attitudes that contribute to…

Human Services
2
Safe Nesttemporary Assistance for

Safe nest's mission is to provide comprehensive, collaborative, and innovative services for everyone affected by domestic and sexual violence while passionatley working to end this shared epidemic.

Human Services
3
Center for Community Solutions

The mission is to end relationship and sexual violence by being a catalyst for caring communities and social justice. the vision is for all people to live full, free, expressive, and empowered lives in a safe, healthy, vibrant, and…

Health
4
Second Chance Dv Sa Shelter

Assist individuals and families experiencing domestic abuse and sexual assault by providing crisis intervention and a full range of support services. second chance also works to emplower the community to understand and prevent the crimes…

Arts & Culture
5
Hush No More

We provide support to survivors of sexual assault, domestic violence, child sexual abuse, and incest.

Health
6
Safe of Columbia County

Domestic and sexual violence intervention, support, and education.

—
7
Cleveland County Abuse Prevention Council Inc

The Abuse Prevention Council provides emergency, advocacy, counseling, education and specialized services for victims of domestic violence, sexual assault, and homeless individuals and families.

Crime & Legal
8
Safe House Inc

S.a.f.e. house is a community based non-profit organization committed to stop abuse in the family environment by providing a comprehensive approach to end domestic violence that includes crisis intervention, safe shelter, counseling,…

Human Services
9
Citrus County Abuse Shelter Associa

Rape crisis and abuse shelter

—
10
Survivors Resources Inc Dba Safe Haven Inc of Pike County

Provide counseling, crisis intervention, 24 hour crisis hotline, advocacy, safe housing and supportive services to victims of sexual assault and domestic violence.

—
11
Domestic Violence Sexual Assault Center Inc

Our mission is to provide compassionate support, resources, and advocacy for victims of violent crime. we are dedicated to empowering children, teens and adults in their journey to healing by offering a safe place, emotional care, and the…

Human Services
12
Safehouse Denver Inc

Safehouse denver assists adult, children, and youth in reclaiming their right to a life free from domestic violence. the agency provides a broad spectrum of culturally competent, trauma-informed services, including but not limited to,…

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Family Crisis Shelter and Services for Yamhill County Inc; the most unlike its peers is Haven From Domestic Violence. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
6/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

EL PROGRAMA HISPANO CATOLICO: $488,291 · Human ServicesEL PROGRAMA HISPANO CATOLICOHAVEN FROM DOMESTIC VIOLENCE: $366,659 · Human ServicesHAVEN FROM DOMESTIC VIOLENCEWOMEN'S CRISIS SUPPORT TEAM: $354,296 · Human ServicesWOMEN'S CRISIS SUPPORT TEAMCLACKAMAS WOMEN'S SERVICES: $157,992 · Human ServicesCLACKAMAS WOMEN'S SERVICESFAMILY CRISIS SHELTER AND SERVICES FOR YAMHILL COUNTY INC: $52,334 · Human Services+1 more: $13,100 · Human ServicesSELF ENHANCEMENT INC: $278,552 · OtherSELF ENHANCEMENT INCTHE HARBOR PREVENTION PROGRAM: $171,615 · OtherTHE HARBOR PREVENTION PROGRAMSEXUAL ASSAULT RESOURCE CENTER: $62,419 · OtherSEXUAL ASSAULT RESOURCE CENTE…CATHOLIC CHARITIES: $52,559 · OtherCATHOLIC CHARITIESTHE HARBOR INC: $167,377 · Health
Human Services$1,432,672Other$565,145Health$167,377

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetEL PROGRAMA HISPANO CATOLICO: $488,291 over 8y, 0.8% of budgetHAVEN FROM DOMESTIC VIOLENCE: $366,659 over 8y, 7.1% of budgetWOMEN'S CRISIS SUPPORT TEAM: $354,296 over 8y, 6.8% of budgetSELF ENHANCEMENT INC: $278,552 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetTHE HARBOR INC: $167,377 over 2y, 5.2% of budgetCLACKAMAS WOMEN'S SERVICES: $157,992 over 4y, 1.8% of budgetSEXUAL ASSAULT RESOURCE CENTER: $62,419 over 2y, 5.1% of budgetFAMILY CRISIS SHELTER AND SERVICES FOR YAMHILL COUNTY INC: $52,334 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetShelter from the Storm: $13,100 over 2y, 1.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds EL PROGRAMA HISPANO CATOLICO ↗
  • Who funds HAVEN FROM DOMESTIC VIOLENCE ↗
  • Who funds WOMEN'S CRISIS SUPPORT TEAM ↗
  • Who funds SELF ENHANCEMENT INC ↗
  • Who funds THE HARBOR INC ↗
  • Who funds CLACKAMAS WOMEN'S SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds SEXUAL ASSAULT RESOURCE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY CRISIS SHELTER AND SERVICES FOR YAMHILL COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds Shelter from the Storm ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Oregon Community FoundationOR22.4× affinity9 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Oregon Community Foundation · Womens Foundation of Oregon · Oregon Coalition Against Domestic and Sexual Violence · The Collins Foundation · OCF Joseph E Weston Public Foundation · Meyer Memorial Trust · The Ford Family Foundation · The Autzen Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Attorney General's Sexual Assault Task Force funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Attorney General's Sexual Assault Task Force. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 66%
  • Shelter from the Storm: 100% of income from government
  • Sexual Assault Resource Center: 81% of income from government
  • Haven From Domestic Violence: 77% of income from government
  • The Harbor Inc: 66% of income from government
  • Clackamas Women's Services: 33% of income from government
  • Self Enhancement Inc: 14% of income from government
  • El Programa Hispano Catolico: 13% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
4rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Attorney General's Sexual Assault Task Force?

Find your warmest path to Attorney General's Sexual Assault Task Force through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 11 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Attorney General's Sexual Assault Task Force’s filings →

More from the funding graph