Skip to content
Atlanta Legal Aid Society Inc at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Atlanta Legal Aid Society Inc

Atlanta legal aid provides legal services to the elderly and indigent citizens of the metropolitan atlanta area.

$317k
Granted FY2024still arriving
2
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$229k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Crime & Legal$3.8M
02FY2024 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$228,643
Median grant
1
States reached
$19M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ATLANTA VOLUNTEER LAWYERS$228,643
GEORGIA LEGAL SERVICES$88,718
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%GEORGIA APPLESEED CENTER FOR LAW & JUSTICE: $90k → 13%GEORGIA APPLESEED CENTER FOR LAW & JUSTICE: $82k → 13%GEORGIA APPLESEED CENTER FOR LAW AND JUSTICE: $69k → 13%PRO BONO PARTNERSHIP OF ATLANTA: $55k → 13%PRO BONO PARTNERSHIP OF ATLANTA INC: $55k → 13%PRO BONO PARTNERSHIP OF ATLANTA: $41k → 13%GEORGIA APPLESEED CENTER FOR LAW & JUSTICE: $37k → 13%PRO BONO PARTNERSHIP: $20k → 13%PRO BONO PARTNERSHIP: $15k → 13%GEORGIA APPLESEED CENTER FOR LAW & JUSTICE: $10k → 13%TRUANCY INTERVENTION PROJECT: $65k → 13%TRUANCY INTERVENTION PROJECT GEORGIA INC: $65k → 13%TRUANCY INTERVENTION PROJECT: $45k → 13%TRUANCY INTERVENTION PROJECT: $23k → 13%GEORGIA LEGAL SERVICES: $452k → 13%GEORGIA LEGAL SERVICES: $376k → 13%GEORGIA LEGAL SERVICES: $337k → 13%GEORGIA LEGAL SERVICES: $302k → 13%GEORGIA HEIRS PROPERTY LAW CENTER INC: $248k → 13%ATLANTA VOLUNTEER LAWYERS: $229k → 13%GEORGIA HEIRS PROPERTY LAW CENTER: $219k → 13%GEORGIA LEGAL SERVICES: $175k → 13%ATLANTA VOLUNTEER LAWYERS: $96k → 13%ATLANTA VOLUNTEER LAWYERS: $89k → 13%GEORGIA LEGAL SERVICES: $89k → 13%ATLANTA VOLUNTEER LAWYERS FOUNDATION: $84k → 13%ATLANTA VOLUNTEER LAWYERS: $76k → 13%ATLANTA VOLUNTEER LAWYERS: $71k → 13%ATLANTA VOLUNTEER LAWYERS: $68k → 13%ATLANTA VOLUNTEER LAWYERS: $61k → 13%GEORGIA HEIRS PROPERTY LAW CENTER: $58k → 13%GEORGIA LEGAL SERVICES: $32k → 13%GEORGIA LEGAL SERVICES: $18k → 13%GEORGIA HEIRS PROPERTY LAW CENTER: $9k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.8M · 6 repeat orgs$0 to everyone else

6 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
0

Total granted

$3.8M
$0

Still filing today

100%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Crime & LegalCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GL
    GEORGIA LEGAL SERVICES PROGRAM INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $1.8M · revenue +74%
  • AV
    ATLANTA VOLUNTEER LAWYERS FOUNDATION IN
    8× · 2017–2024 · $773k · revenue +63%
  • TG
    THE GEORGIA HEIRS PROPERTY LAW CENTER INC
    4× · 2017–2020 · $534k · revenue +217% · 35% of their budget

Funded once

    How this is measured

    Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

    04Its field
    04the grantee network

    6 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

    Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

    How this is measured

    Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

    Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

    1
    Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
    2
    Early backer (in before they grew)
    6/6
    Grantees still filing
    5/6
    Grew since first funded

    Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

    GEORGIA LEGAL SERVICES PROGRAM INC: $1,781,707 · Crime & LegalGEORGIA LEGAL SERVICES PROGRAM INCTHE GEORGIA HEIRS PROPERTY LAW CENTER INC: $533,600 · Crime & LegalTHE GEORGIA HEIRS PROPERTY LAW CENTER INCTRUANCY INTERVENTION PROJECT GEORGIA: $198,045 · Crime & LegalTRUANCY INTERVENTION PROJECT GEORGIAPRO BONO PARTNERSHIP OF ATLANTA INC: $186,370 · Crime & LegalPRO BONO PARTNERSHIP OF ATLANTA INCATLANTA VOLUNTEER LAWYERS FOUNDATION IN: $773,229 · OtherATLANTA VOLUNTEER LAWYE…GEORGIA APPLESEED INC: $287,524 · Civil Rights
    Crime & Legal$2,699,722Other$773,229Civil Rights$287,524

    Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

    25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGEORGIA LEGAL SERVICES PROGRAM INC: $1,781,707 over 8y, 2.9% of budgetATLANTA VOLUNTEER LAWYERS FOUNDATION IN: $773,229 over 8y, 4.1% of budgetTHE GEORGIA HEIRS PROPERTY LAW CENTER INC: $533,600 over 4y, 35% of budgetGEORGIA APPLESEED INC: $287,524 over 5y, 14% of budgetTRUANCY INTERVENTION PROJECT GEORGIA: $198,045 over 4y, 12% of budgetPRO BONO PARTNERSHIP OF ATLANTA INC: $186,370 over 5y, 6.7% of budget
    Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

    A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

    Co-funders

    Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

    Georgia Bar Foundatio…The Community Foundat…The Rich Foundation I…The Zeist Foundation …The Imlay Foundation …Equal Justice WorksUnited Way of Greater…Georgia Power Foundat…Mightycause Charitabl…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
    Georgia Bar Foundation IncGA17.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

    Open a dossier: Georgia Bar Foundation Inc · The Community Foundation for Greater Atlanta Inc · The Rich Foundation Inc · The Zeist Foundation Inc · The Imlay Foundation Inc · Equal Justice Works · United Way of Greater Atlanta Inc · Georgia Power Foundation Inc · Mightycause Charitable Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

    How this is measured
    Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

    How much its grantees rely on government

    Each dot is one organization Atlanta Legal Aid Society Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Atlanta Legal Aid Society Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

    2024
    ’20’21’22’23’24’25
    no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →
      no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
      0get no government money at all
      4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
      0rely on government for over half their income
      ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
      typical government reliance, FY20–25
      How this is measured
      Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

      On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 6 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

      How this is measured
      Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

      Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

      Source object · view filing

      Play a game based on Atlanta Legal Aid Society’s filings →

      More from the funding graph

      The unnamed billions
      grants reported with no recipient in the public record
      The regranting layer
      51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
      The DAF merry-go-round
      $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
      The endowment market
      who holds foundation money, and what just moved
      The camps
      funders cluster by geography, not ideology
      By state
      where grant money is based, and what stays home