Skip to content
Atid Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Atid Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$154k
Granted FY2024still arriving
2
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$104k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0191% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$276kInternational$192kPhilanthropy$107kRecreation & Sports$80kHuman Services$55kArts & Culture$54kEnvironment$25kScience & Tech$13kOther$0
02FY2024 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$104,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NICOYA PENINSULA FOUNDATION$104,000
AMIGOS OF COSTA RICA$50,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–20, $34k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%ASSOCIATION TO BENEFIT CHILDREN: $10k → 17%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF UN TECHO PARA MI PAIS INC: $11k → 15%ASSOCIATION TO BENEFIT CHILDREN: $10k → 17%ASSOCIATION TO BENEFIT CHILDREN: $2k → 17%GLASSWING INTERNATIONAL USA INC: $300 → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NH
NY
PA
CA
CO
MD
NM
TN
NC
DC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 14% of Atid Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Atid Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 2.4% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

71%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$522k · 10 repeat orgs$210k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +69% since the first grant, against +16% for those funded once.

10 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2024, 9 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
28

Total granted

$522k
$106k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+69%
+16%

Still filing today

40%
57%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 32% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $104k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
InternationalPhilanthropyHuman ServicesEducationHealthReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY
    5× · 2017–2023 · $199k · revenue +47%
  • AO
    AMIGOS OF COSTA RICA INC
    5× · 2017–2024 · $183k · revenue ×15
  • SF
    SOCCER FOR PEACE FOUNDATION INC
    4× · 2020–2023 · $22k · revenue +69%

Funded once

  • KT
    KISS THE GROUND
    one grant, 2023 · $25k · revenue -44%
  • TP
    The Pinhead Institute
    one grant, 2022 · $13k · revenue -6%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2018 · $12k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
2
World Learning Inc

Creating a more sustainable, peaceful, and just world through education, development, and exchange since 1932. as both an accredited academic institution and an international ngo, world learning, inc. offers the best of theory and practice…

International
3
Management Sciences for Health Inc

(msh) saves lives and improves the health of the world's poorest (see schedule o) and most vulnerable people by closing the gap between knowledge and action in public health.

International
4
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
5
University of Miami

See Form 990, Part I, Line 1, Description of Organization Mission.

Education
6
The Translational Genomics Research Institute

Please see schedule o

Health
7
University of Southern California

The central mission of the university of southern california is the development of human beings and society as a whole through the cultivation and enrichment of the human mind and spirit. the principal means by which our mission is…

Education
8
Access to Advanced Health Institute

Aahi is a nonprofit biotech research institute, bringing together the best experts, technologies, and platforms to create accessible, high-quality products and solutions for harnessing the immune system to alleviate disease.

Health
9
University of Minnesota Physicians

University of minnesota physicians serves as the integrated group practice for the university of minnesota medical school full-time faculty to provide the highest quality healthcare to patients and their families.university of minnesota…

Health
10
Research Triangle Institute

Research Triangle Institute is one of the world's leading research institutes, dedicated to improving the human condition by turning knowledge into practice. Our staff of more than 5,300 provides research and technical (continued on…

Science & Tech
11
Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation

Partners In Health (PIH) is a non-profit, global health organization that fights social injustice by bringing the benefits of modern medical science first and foremost to the most vulnerable communities worldwide. In Haiti, Malawi, Rwanda,…

Health
12
Target Als Foundation Inc

Our mission is to break down barriers to als research to find effective treatments. by uniting academia, the pharma and biotech industry, government, venture capital, related nonprofits, and the als community, we aim to overcome the…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Innovation Africa; the most unlike its peers is The Pinhead Institute. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 41 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
22/23
Grantees still filing
15/23
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY: $199,000 · EducationGEORGETOWN UNIVERSITYTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $75,000 · EducationTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSY…+1 more: $1,800 · EducationNICOYA PENINSULA FOUNDATION: $104,000 · OtherNICOYA PENINSULA FOUNDATIONNY ACADEMY OF ART: $45,252 · OtherNY ACADEMY OF ARTFUTBOL CON CORAZON FOUNDATION: $20,000 · OtherFUTBOL CON CORAZON FOUNDATIONIndividual grant recipient: $11,500 · OtherAMERICAN FRIENDS SERVICE COMMITTEE: $8,242 · OtherThe Pinhead Institute: $13,000 · OtherThe Pinhead Institute+18 more: $36,974 · Other+18 moreAMIGOS OF COSTA RICA INC: $183,400 · InternationalAMIGOS OF COSTA RICA INCSOCCER FOR PEACE FOUNDATION INC: $21,850 · InternationalSOCCER FOR PEACE FOUNDATION …+3 more: $8,000 · InternationalTELLURIDE FOUNDATION: $38,540 · Recreation & SportsASSOCIATION TO BENEFIT CHILDREN: $21,800 · Human ServicesAmerican Friends of Un Techo Para Mi Pais Inc: $11,400 · Human Services+1 more: $300 · Human ServicesKISS THE GROUND: $25,000 · Food & NutritionURBAN ZEN FOUNDATION: $15,000 · PhilanthropyREMA HORT MANN FOUNDATION INC: $1,800 · PhilanthropyDAVID LYNCH FOUNDATION FOR CONSCIOUSNESS -BASED EDUCATION AND WORLD PEACE: $1,800 · PhilanthropyUniversalGiving: $1,800 · Philanthropy
Education$275,800Other$238,968International$213,250Recreation & Sports$38,540Human Services$33,500Food & Nutrition$25,000Philanthropy$20,400

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY: $199,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetAMIGOS OF COSTA RICA INC: $183,400 over 5y, 1.1% of budgetTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $75,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTELLURIDE FOUNDATION: $38,540 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetKISS THE GROUND: $25,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetSOCCER FOR PEACE FOUNDATION INC: $21,850 over 4y, 2.9% of budgetASSOCIATION TO BENEFIT CHILDREN: $21,800 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetURBAN ZEN FOUNDATION: $15,000 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetThe Pinhead Institute: $13,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetAmerican Friends of Un Techo Para Mi Pais Inc: $11,400 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetGLOBALGIVING FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetREMA HORT MANN FOUNDATION INC: $1,800 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetDAVID LYNCH FOUNDATION FOR CONSCIOUSNESS -BASED EDUCATION AND WORLD PEACE: $1,800 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJ STREET EDUCATION FUND INC: $1,800 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUniversalGiving: $1,800 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER: $1,800 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINNOVATION AFRICA: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE WATER PROJECT INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTEENSMART INTERNATIONAL: $1,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSMILE TRAIN INC: $1,250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGLASSWING INTERNATIONAL USA INC: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVETERINARIANS INTERNATIONAL INC: $115 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Goldman Sachs Cha…Gs Donor Advised Phil…Jpmorgan Chase Founda…Paypal Charitable Giv…Vanguard Charitable E…Network for GoodDonor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift FundNY12.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Network for Good · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Atid Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Atid Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Atid Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Atid Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 41 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Atid’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home