Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersMostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →
Plinth

· Public charity

Association for Neighborhood & Housing Development

To support community development in low and moderate income neighborhoods of New York City by providing training and program support to community based groups that work to build and preserve affordable housing.

$228k
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$38k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.

Housing & Shelter$1.9MCommunity Improvement$1.0MHuman Services$283kCivil Rights$95kReligion$80kCrime & Legal$45kEmployment$43kEducation$16kOther$0
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$17,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$6.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHHAYA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORP$37,500
NORTHWEST BRONX COMMUNITY & CLERGY$37,500
WOMENS HOUSING AND ECONOMIC DEV$25,000
NORTHERN MANHATTAN IMPROVEMENT CORP$17,500
COOPER SQUARE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT$17,500
FIFTH AVENUE COMMITTEE$17,500
CAAAV ORGANIZING ASIAN COMMUNITIES$12,500
JUSTICE INNOVATION INC$12,500
IMPACT BROOKLYN$12,500
ASIAN AMERICAN FOR EQUALITY$12,500
ST NICKS ALLIANCE$12,500
FLATBUSH TENANT COALITION$12,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–23, $870k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 97% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%Public Allies Inc: $185k → 17%PUBLIC ALLIES INC: $95k → 17%CIANA: $10k → 13%Public Allies Inc: $91k → 17%Mixteca Organization Inc: $11k → 20%Mixteca Organization Inc: $5k → 20%Mekong Inc: $7k → 28%Mekog Inc: $5k → 28%MinKwon Conter for Community Action: $10k → 13%ASIAN AMERICAN FEDERATION: $25k → 17%RISEBORO COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIP: $20k → 20%YWCA of Queens: $5k → 13%Chinese American Planning Council: $10k → 17%Riseboro Community Partnership: $20k → 20%MinKwon Center for Community Action: $5k → 13%Chinese American Planning Council: $5k → 17%Ridgewood Bushwick Sr Citizen: $20k → 20%Caribbean Women's Health Association: $10k → 20%Council Of Peoples Organization: $11k → 20%Council of People's Organization: $5k → 20%Public Allies Inc: $315k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$2.9M · 32 repeat orgs$571k to everyone else

32 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2025, 22 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

32
25

Total granted

$2.9M
$533k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+42%
+82%

Still filing today

97%
92%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $38k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Community ImprovementHousing & ShelterHuman ServicesCrime & LegalCivil RightsEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CC
    CHHAYA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
    9× · 2017–2025 · $250k · revenue +399%
  • CS
    Cooper Square Community Development Committee Inc
    7× · 2017–2025 · $188k · revenue +46%
  • NB
    Northwest Bronx Community and Clergy Coalition Inc
    7× · 2017–2025 · $183k · revenue +220%

Funded once

  • EI
    EVERGREEN INC YOUR NORTH BROOKLYN BUSINESS EXCHANGEgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $60k · revenue +71%
  • MM
    MHANY MANAGEMENT INCgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $60k · revenue +106%
  • CV
    Community Voices Heard Inc
    one grant, 2022 · $43k · revenue -2%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Sebco Development Inc

Sebco development inc. is a non profit community based organization committed to developing and maintaining affordable and safe housing in the city of new york. sebco strives to continually provide well maintained, secure housing along…

Housing & Shelter
2
Northeast Brooklyn Housing Develop

The Organization is commited to the preservation, development, and management of affordable housing and home ownership opportunities:community and economic development initiative and human services to effect social change in central…

Housing & Shelter
3
New York Housing Conference Inc

NYHCs mission is to advance City, State and Federal policies and funding to support the development and preservation of decent and affordable housing for all New Yorkers. NYHC is a nonprofit affordable housing policy and advocacy…

Housing & Shelter
4
South Bronx Community Management Co Inc

The company is involved in acquiring and managing residential dwelling units primarily in the south bronx, for low income families.

Housing & Shelter
5
Community Development Project Inc

Takeroot justice provides legal, participatory research and policy support to strengthen the work of grassroots and community-based groups in new york city to dismantle racial, economic and social oppression.

Community Improvement
6
Central Brooklyn Economic Development Corp

Develop and provide affordable housing

Education
7
Preserving City Neighborhoods Housing Development Fund Corp

The corporation is organized exclusively for the purpose of perserving and creating, on a non-profit basis, housing projects for persons of low and moderate income. in addition to promoting affordable housing opportunities, it seeks to…

Housing & Shelter
8
Brooklyn Navy Yard Development Corp

To manage the brooklyn navy yard for the city of new york, specifically to expand job opportunities for new yorkers by fostering the development of small businesses.

Community Improvement
9
Green Worker Inc

The organization is based in the south bronx and serves immigrants and communities of color by building, growing, and sustaining worker-owned green businesses to create a strong, local, and democratic economy rooted in racial and gender…

Environment
10
Latino Americanos Unidos Del Bronx Ny Inc
Human Services
11
Abyssinian Development Corporation

A comprehensive community development corporation focused on providing affordable housing to low and moderate income families and social services, principally educational programs in the areas of college/career readiness, stem, and…

—
12
Community Capital New York Inc

Community capital is a nonprofit lender that has revitalized communities and transformed lives in the mid-hudson valley, bronx and fairfield county, ct for 36 years. our mission is to foster economic opportunity for underserved individuals…

Housing & Shelter

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Chinese-American Planning Council Inc and the most unlike its peers is Rema 4 Us Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 34 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number20%0%<5yr15%7%5–10yr21%12%10–20yr22%35%20–35yr13%42%35–55yr9%4%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value20%0%<5yr15%3%5–10yr21%4%10–20yr22%45%20–35yr13%41%35–55yr9%7%55yr+

The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/59
the rest of the field
11%
4,574/40,176

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

57 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 57 of the 59 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
24
Early backer (in before they grew)
56/57
Grantees still filing
44/57
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Cooper Square Community Development Committee Inc — $188,050 · Community ImprovementCooper Square Community Development Com…Northwest Bronx Community and Clergy Coalition Inc — $183,300 · Community ImprovementNorthwest Bronx Community and Clergy Co…CYPRESS HILLS LOCAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $163,300 · Community ImprovementCYPRESS HILLS LOCAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORA…GREATER JAMAICA DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $128,500 · Community ImprovementGREATER JAMAICA DEVELOPMENT CORPORATIONGOOD OLD LOWER EAST SIDE INC — $95,000 · Community ImprovementGOOD OLD LOWER EAST SIDE INCBANANA KELLY COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT ASSOCIATIONINC — $80,000 · Community ImprovementBANANA KELLY COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT ASSO…Neighborhood Housing Services of Queens CDC Inc — $72,500 · Community ImprovementNeighborhood Housing Services of Queens…EVERGREEN INC YOUR NORTH BROOKLYN BUSINESS EXCHANGE — $60,000 · Community Improvement+9 more — $247,750 · Community Improvement+9 morePUBLIC ALLIES INC — $685,564 · Human ServicesPUBLIC ALLIES INCRISEBORO COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIP INC — $60,000 · Human ServicesRISEBORO COMMUNITY PARTNERSH…+9 more — $124,250 · Human Services+9 moreTHE CRENULATED COMPANY LTD — $153,300 · Housing & ShelterTHE CRENULATED C…MHANY MANAGEMENT INC — $60,000 · Housing & ShelterMHANY MANAGEMENT…HOPE COMMUNITY INC — $40,000 · Housing & ShelterHOPE COMMUNITY I…ASCENDANT NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $40,000 · Housing & ShelterASCENDANT NEIGHB…WEST SIDE FEDERATION FOR SENIOR AND SUPPORTIVE HOUSING INC — $40,000 · Housing & ShelterWEST SIDE FEDERA…PRATT AREA COMMUNITY COUNCIL INC — $32,500 · Housing & ShelterPRATT AREA COMMU…WOMEN'S HOUSING & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $25,000 · Housing & ShelterNEIGHBORS HELPING NEIGHBORS INC — $22,500 · Housing & ShelterUHAB HOUSING DEVELOPMENT FUND CORPORATION — $20,000 · Housing & ShelterLOS SURES SIP HOUSING DEVELOPMENT FUND CORPORATION — $20,000 · Housing & ShelterSOUTHSIDE UNITED HOUSING DEVELOPMENT FUND CORPORATION — $20,000 · Housing & ShelterNORTHFIELD COMMUNITY LDC OF STATEN ISLAND INC — $20,000 · Housing & Shelter+1 more — $10,000 · Housing & ShelterFIFTH AVENUE COMMITTEE INC — $130,300 · OtherFIFTH AVENUE CO…ST NICKS ALLIANCE — $123,500 · OtherST NICKS ALLIAN…ASIAN AMERICANS FOR EQUALITY INC — $95,000 · OtherASIAN AMERICANS…BROOKLYN LEVEL UP INC — $30,000 · OtherBROOKLYN LEVEL …CATHOLIC MIGRATION SERVICES INC — $20,000 · OtherURBAN JUSTICE CENTER — $17,500 · OtherCommunity Voices Heard Inc — $42,500 · OtherCommunity Voice…+2 more — $18,300 · OtherCHHAYA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $249,750 · Crime & LegalCHHAYA COM…Make the Road New York — $72,500 · Crime & LegalMake the R…JUSTICE INNOVATION INC — $12,500 · Crime & LegalTHE FORUM FOR URBAN DESIGN — $25,000 · EducationMASA-MEXED INC — $17,500 · EducationYEMENI AMERICAN MERCHANT ASSOCIATION INC — $15,750 · EducationCommittee Against Anti-Asian Violence Inc — $35,000 · Civil RightsDAMAYAN MIGRANT WORKERS ASSOCIATION INC — $17,500 · Civil RightsSAUTI YETU CENTER FOR AFRICAN WOMEN INC — $5,000 · Civil Rights
Community Improvement$1,218,400Human Services$869,814Housing & Shelter$503,300Other$477,100Crime & Legal$334,750Education$58,250Civil Rights$57,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetPUBLIC ALLIES INC — $685,564 over 4y, 2.2% of budgetCHHAYA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $249,750 over 9y, 1.7% of budgetCooper Square Community Development Committee Inc — $188,050 over 7y, 5.7% of budgetNorthwest Bronx Community and Clergy Coalition Inc — $183,300 over 7y, 0.9% of budgetCYPRESS HILLS LOCAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $163,300 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetTHE CRENULATED COMPANY LTD — $153,300 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetFIFTH AVENUE COMMITTEE INC — $130,300 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetGREATER JAMAICA DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $128,500 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetASIAN AMERICANS FOR EQUALITY INC — $95,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetGOOD OLD LOWER EAST SIDE INC — $95,000 over 5y, 1.4% of budgetBANANA KELLY COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT ASSOCIATIONINC — $80,000 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetNeighborhood Housing Services of Queens CDC Inc — $72,500 over 4y, 2.2% of budgetMake the Road New York — $72,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetRISEBORO COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIP INC — $60,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetEVERGREEN INC YOUR NORTH BROOKLYN BUSINESS EXCHANGE — $60,000 over 1y, 7.3% of budgetMHANY MANAGEMENT INC — $60,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetCommunity Voices Heard Inc — $42,500 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetHOPE COMMUNITY INC — $40,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetBUSINESS OUTREACH CENTER NETWORK INC — $40,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetNORTHERN MANHATTAN IMPROVEMENT CORPORATION — $40,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetASCENDANT NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $40,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetWEST SIDE FEDERATION FOR SENIOR AND SUPPORTIVE HOUSING INC — $40,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY LEAGUE OF THE HEIGHTS INC — $38,500 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetFLATBUSH DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $35,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetCommittee Against Anti-Asian Violence Inc — $35,000 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetPRATT AREA COMMUNITY COUNCIL INC — $32,500 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetBROOKLYN LEVEL UP INC — $30,000 over 1y, 13% of budgetGREENPOINT MANUFACTURING AND DESIGN CENTER LOCAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $30,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetTHE FORUM FOR URBAN DESIGN — $25,000 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetWOMEN'S HOUSING & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetASIAN AMERICAN FEDERATION INC — $24,750 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetWE STAY-NOS QUEDAMOS INC — $22,500 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetNEIGHBORS HELPING NEIGHBORS INC — $22,500 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetUHAB HOUSING DEVELOPMENT FUND CORPORATION — $20,000 over 1y, 6.5% of budgetLOS SURES SIP HOUSING DEVELOPMENT FUND CORPORATION — $20,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetSOUTHSIDE UNITED HOUSING DEVELOPMENT FUND CORPORATION — $20,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCATHOLIC MIGRATION SERVICES INC — $20,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetNORTHFIELD COMMUNITY LDC OF STATEN ISLAND INC — $20,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetDAMAYAN MIGRANT WORKERS ASSOCIATION INC — $17,500 over 2y, 2.5% of budgetMASA-MEXED INC — $17,500 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetURBAN JUSTICE CENTER — $17,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMIXTECA ORGANIZATION INC — $16,250 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetCHINESE-AMERICAN PLANNING COUNCIL INC — $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMINKWON CENTER FOR COMMUNITY ACTION INC — $15,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetJUSTICE INNOVATION INC — $12,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCARROLL GARDENS ASSOCIATION INC — $10,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetCENTER FOR THE INTEGRATION & ADVANCEMENT OF NEW AMERICANS INC — $10,000 over 1y, 4.3% of budgetUrban Manufacturing Alliance Inc — $9,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Robin Hood FoundationUnited Way of New Yor…New York FoundationNew York Women's Foun…Enterprise Community …North Star Fund IncBrooklyn Community Fo…The New York Communit…Webster Bank Charitab…Citi FoundationLily Auchincloss Foun…Fund for the City of …
Robin Hood FoundationNY59.1× affinity28 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Robin Hood Foundation · United Way of New York City · New York Foundation · New York Women's Foundation Inc · Enterprise Community Partners Inc · North Star Fund Inc · Brooklyn Community Foundation · The New York Community Trust · Webster Bank Charitable Foundation · Citi Foundation · Lily Auchincloss Foundation Inc · Fund for the City of New York Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Association for Neighborhood & Housing Development funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    32report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 59 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home