· Private foundation
Asofsky Family Foundation Inc
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k5 grants · $10k
- $10k–50k12 grants · $198k
- $250k+1 grant · $349k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| TAKE STOCK IN CHILDREN | $348,851 |
| THE LORD'S PLACE | $30,000 |
| CAMP FIESTA | $30,000 |
| BOCA HELPING HANDS | $25,000 |
| EDUCATION FNDN OF PALM BEACH COUNTY | $25,000 |
| LITTLE VILLAGE ENVIRON JUSTICE ORG | $15,000 |
| 211 PALM BEACHTREASURE COAST | $12,000 |
| ALZHEIMER'S COMMUNITY CARES | $11,000 |
| WHEELCHAIR 4 KIDS | $10,000 |
| MOBILE LOAVES & FISHES | $10,000 |
| SWEET DREAM MAKERS | $10,000 |
| ISLAND HARVEST | $10,000 |
| STUDENT ACES | $10,000 |
| AMERICAN FRIENDS OF JAMAICA | $2,500 |
| PIECE BY PIECE | $2,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $879k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 36% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +82% since the first grant, against +32% for the ones you funded once.
27 repeat relationships — 15 still active in FY2025, 12 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- IHISLAND HARVEST LTD9× · 2017–2025 · $313k · revenue +110%
- BHBOCA HELPING HANDS INC9× · 2017–2025 · $215k · revenue +121%
- CFCAMP FIESTA INC7× · 2017–2025 · $193k · revenue +82% · 30% of their budget
Funded once
- NINATIONAL IMMIGRANT JUSTICE CENTERone grant, 2017 · $40k
- NMNEW MOMS INCgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $40k · revenue +166%
- YMYMCA METROPOLITAN LOS ANGELESone grant, 2020 · $28k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Organization mission: florida's children first is a non-profit, nonpartisan, independent advocacy organization committed to protecting and advancing the rights of children and youth impacted by the child welfare, juvenile justice, and…
The mission is to create a community-based network that develops coordinates and provides quality education accessible health care youth development programs opportunities for employment and safe neighborhoods for children and families…
Childnet's mission is to protect broward and palm beach counties' abused, abandoned and neglected children, to ensure their safety and to promptly provide them with a permanent, loving home.
To provide dedicated volunteers to advocate in court for the best interests of children who have experienced abuse or neglect.
To promote policies that build effective primary prevention and early intervention systems of support for florida's children and families by engaging and enhancing the collective strengths of the individual children's services councils of…
Feeding south florida's mission is to end hunger in south florida by providing immediate access to nutritious food, leading hunger and poverty advocacy efforts, and transforming lives through innovative programming and education.
Inspired by jewish values, we protect the vulnerable, empower individuals and strengthen families. (continued on schedule o)
Florida community health centers, inc. (fchc) is a federally qualified health center serving medically needy populations in south florida, with an emphasis on serving rural and farm worker communities.
Better together helps at-risk families by empowering parents and surrounding them with community, meaningful work opportunities, and practical support. our volunteer-driven, professionally supported model provides direct services so that…
The institute for child and family health is committed to empowering the children, youth and families of miami-dade county, florida by providing services that enhance their emotional, physical and educational well-being.
To develop and provide services that enable children and families to realize their fullest potential.
Miami Homes For All's mission is to ensure that everyone in Miami-Dade has a safe, affordable place to call home.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is New Moms Inc and the most unlike its peers is VETS2SET Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 27 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 27% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 17% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
53 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 53 of the 78 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds TSIC INC DBA/TAKE STOCK IN CHILDREN ↗
- Who funds ISLAND HARVEST LTD ↗
- Who funds BOCA HELPING HANDS INC ↗
- Who funds CAMP FIESTA INC ↗
- Who funds The Safe Center LI Inc ↗
- Who funds THE LORD'S PLACE INC ↗
- Who funds EDUCATION FOUNDATION OF PALM BEACH COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds 211 Palm BeachTreasure Coast Inc ↗
- Who funds ALZHEIMER'S COMMUNITY CARE INC ↗
- Who funds NEIGHBORS LINK CORP ↗
- Who funds Wheelchairs 4 Kids Inc ↗
- Who funds Student Aces Inc ↗
- Who funds PALM BEACH SCHOOL FOR AUTISM INC ↗
- Who funds HARTFORD YOUTH SCHOLARS INC ↗
- Who funds NEW MOMS INC ↗
- Who funds PLACE OF HOPE INC ↗
- Who funds Sweet Dream Makers Inc ↗
- Who funds MOBILE LOAVES & FISHES INC ↗
- Who funds MAYO CLINIC ↗
- Who funds VETS2SET INC ↗
- Who funds PIECE BY PIECE ↗
- Who funds SOS CHILDREN'S VILLAGES FLORIDAINC ↗
- Who funds CROSSROADS FUND INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN NEAR EAST REFUGEE AID ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF NATAL INC ↗
- Who funds Urban Ministries of Durham Inc ↗
- Who funds VOLUNTEER FLORIDA FOUNDATION INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Batchelor Foundation Inc · Lost Tree Village Charitable Foundation · Community Foundation for Palm Beach and Martin Counties Inc · Quantum Foundation Inc · United Way of Palm Beach County Inc · Ibis Charities Foundation Inc · The Jim Moran Foundation Inc · Leslie L Alexander Foundation Inc · The Chamber of Nonprofit Health and Human Agencies in Palm Beach County Inc · The Frederick a Deluca Foundation Inc · The Mary Alice Fortin Foundation · Children's Healthcare Charity Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Asofsky Family Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- 211 Palm BeachTreasure Coast Inc — 17% of income from government
- The Lord's Place Inc — 12% of income from government
- Star of the Sea Foundation Inc — 8% of income from government
- Volunteer Florida Foundation Inc — 2% of income from government
- Tsic Inc Dba/Take Stock in Children — 0% of income from government
- Place of Hope Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Asofsky Family Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to Asofsky Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.