Skip to content
Asociacion de Puertorriquenos En Marcha Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Asociacion de Puertorriquenos En Marcha Inc

To promote the welfare of puerto rican / latino residents of the greater philadelphia area through their health, human serivces and community development programs.

$14M
Granted FY2017
41
Grants FY2017
4
States reached
$1.1M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01FY2017 · 41 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 41 grants below total $9,570,894, the rows itemized in this filing. The $13,632,639 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $4,061,745 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2017

  • Under $10k1 grant · $9k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $168k
  • $50k–250k23 grants · $2.7M
  • $250k+11 grants · $6.7M
$121,899
Median grant
4
States reached
$41M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CATHOLIC SOCIAL SERVICES$1,067,973
PROGRESSIVE LIFE CENTER$901,284
CARSON VALLEY CHILDREN'S AID$888,281
A SECOND CHANCE$850,755
CHILD FIRST SERVICES INC$618,721
GEORGE JUNIOR Of PA$557,669
WOODS SERVICES$495,372
CHILDREN'S CHOICE$374,005
BETHANY CHRISTIAN SERVICES$345,679
TABOR CHILDREN'S SERVICES$313,188
CONCILIO$294,273
NORTHERN CHILDREN SERVICES$222,241
VISION QUEST NATIONAL LTD$193,229
BETHANNA$157,422
FIRST CHOICE HOME AND COMMUNITY SERVICES$144,301
02The need
02

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–17, $3.7M) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 82% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%WOODS SERVICES: $495k → 6%CONCERN: $61k → 11%A SECOND CHANCE: $851k → 11%FRIENDSHIP HOUSE: $123k → 13%CHILDREN'S CHOICE: $374k → 12%BETHANNA: $157k → 6%TURNING POINTS FOR CHILDREN: $50k → 22%ELWYN: $95k → 10%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES: $122k → 22%NEW FOUNDATIONS INC: $74k → 22%TABOR CHILDREN'S SERVICES: $313k → 22%NORTHERN CHILDREN SERVICES: $222k → 22%METHODIST SERVICES: $134k → 22%CHILD FIRST SERVICES INC: $619k → 22%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Philhaven

Philhaven promotes hope, healing and wholeness through the provision of behavioral resources.

Health
2
Family and Children's Services of Centra

To transform the lives of children and adults by providing opportunities to build self-confidence, resilience and hope.

Human Services
3
Pinebrook Family Answers

The agency's mission states "pinebrook family answers nurtures and empowers children, adults and families by providing mental health services and community-based programs throughout the greater lehigh valley. we do this through initiatives…

Human Services
4
Bethesda Children's Home

Bethesda's vision is to fulfill the social, emotional, spiritual, and behavioral health needs of children, families, and individuals by providing an effective and efficient continuum of care in a quality focused environment.

Human Services
5
Preferred Behavioral Health of Nj Inc

To deliver quality and compassionate behavioral health services to individuals and families all the time through a trauma informed care philosophy and approach.

Health
6
Citrus Health Network Inc

To provide primary care and behavioral health services to children, adults, and families in south florida across a broad range of health services and community-based programs; and to oversee the coordinated child welfare system of care…

—
7
Wesley Family Services

To empower children, adults and families by providing transformational quality whole person care.

Human Services
8
Pathways Youth and Family Services Inc

Pathways' mission is: transforming lives, families and communities.

Human Services
9
Community Care

To provide quality community-based services that are timely and effective in promoting the health and well being of individuals and their families.

Human Services
10
Nexus-Path Family Healing

Strengthening lives, families, and communities through our cornerstone values.

Human Services
11
Alternatives Inc

Alternatives, inc was established to provide comprehensive services to individuals/families with special needs to enable them to reach their highest level of independence and integration into the community.

Human Services
12
Depaul Community Resources

Depaul serves children and families involved in the child welfare system and children and adults with developmental disabilities. vision: opening doors to hope and belonging. corporate mission: we work to support the success of our cients…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Children's Home of Easton Inc; the most unlike its peers is Catholic Social Services. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
03the grantee network

31 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 31 of the 40 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
30/31
Grantees still filing
24/31
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Catholic Social Services: $1,067,973 · OtherCatholic Social ServicesPROGRESSIVE LIFE CENTER INC: $901,284 · OtherPROGRESSIVE LIFE CENTER INCBETHANY CHRISTIAN SERVICES: $345,679 · OtherBETHANY CHRISTIAN SERVICESCOUNCIL OF SPANISH SPEAKING ORGANIZATIONS INC: $294,273 · OtherCOUNCIL OF SPANISH SPEAKING ORGANIZATIONS INCVisionQuest: $193,229 · OtherFIRST CHOICE HOME AND COMMUNITY SERVICES: $144,301 · OtherPRESBYTERIAN CHILDRENS SERVICES: $140,941 · OtherSPECTRUM COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $136,214 · Other+9 more: $670,685 · Other+9 moreA SECOND CHANCE INC: $850,755 · Human ServicesA SECOND CHANCE INCCHILDFIRST SERVICES INC: $618,721 · Human ServicesCHILDFIRST SERVICES INCWoods Services Inc: $495,372 · Human ServicesWoods Services IncCHILDREN'S CHOICE INC: $374,005 · Human ServicesCHILDREN'S CHOICE INCTabor Children's Services Inc: $313,188 · Human ServicesTabor Children's Services IncNorthern Children's Services: $222,241 · Human ServicesNorthern Children's ServicesBETHANNA: $157,422 · Human ServicesMETHODIST SERVICES: $134,270 · Human Services+6 more: $524,707 · Human Services+6 moreCarson Valley Children's Aid: $888,281 · HealthCarson Valley Childre…GEORGE JUNIOR REPUBLIC IN PENNSYLVANIA: $557,669 · HealthGEORGE JUNIOR REPUBLI…NORTHEAST TREATMENT CENTERS INC: $132,317 · HealthNORTHEAST TREATMENT C…THE THERAPEUTIC CENTER AT FOX CHASE AKA THE BRIDGE: $121,803 · HealthTHE THERAPEUTIC CENTE…+2 more: $102,937 · Health+2 morePHMC Integrated: $142,340 · EducationBEING BEAUTIFUL FOUNDATION: $23,638 · EducationCOMMUNITY SPECIALISTS CORPORATION: $16,649 · Crime & Legal
Other$3,894,579Human Services$3,690,681Health$1,803,007Education$165,978Crime & Legal$16,649

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCatholic Social Services: $1,067,973 over 1y, 4.3% of budgetPROGRESSIVE LIFE CENTER INC: $901,284 over 1y, 4.9% of budgetCarson Valley Children's Aid: $888,281 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetA SECOND CHANCE INC: $850,755 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetCHILDFIRST SERVICES INC: $618,721 over 1y, 6.7% of budgetGEORGE JUNIOR REPUBLIC IN PENNSYLVANIA: $557,669 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetWoods Services Inc: $495,372 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCHILDREN'S CHOICE INC: $374,005 over 1y, 4.2% of budgetTabor Children's Services Inc: $313,188 over 1y, 5.8% of budgetCOUNCIL OF SPANISH SPEAKING ORGANIZATIONS INC: $294,273 over 1y, 8.1% of budgetNorthern Children's Services: $222,241 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetBETHANNA: $157,422 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetPHMC Integrated: $142,340 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSPECTRUM COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $136,214 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetMETHODIST SERVICES: $134,270 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetNORTHEAST TREATMENT CENTERS INC: $132,317 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetFRIENDSHIP HOUSE: $122,603 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICE OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA: $121,899 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetTHE THERAPEUTIC CENTER AT FOX CHASE AKA THE BRIDGE: $121,803 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetYOUTH SERVICE INC: $120,460 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetJUVENILE JUSTICE CENTER OF PHILA: $108,270 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetELWYN OF PENNSYLVANIA AND DELAWARE: $95,148 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEW FOUNDATIONS INC: $73,625 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetConcern - Professional Services for Children Youth And Families: $61,393 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetThe Devereux Foundation: $58,407 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTURNING POINTS FOR CHILDREN: $50,039 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAssessment & Treatment Alternatives Inc: $44,530 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetBEING BEAUTIFUL FOUNDATION: $23,638 over 1y, 6.2% of budgetPATH (PEOPLE ACTING TO HELP) INC: $19,898 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY SPECIALISTS CORPORATION: $16,649 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Philadelphia Foun…United Way of Greater…Rite Aid Healthy Futu…W W Smith Charitable …Pennsylvania Automoti…The Cigna Group Found…The William Penn Foun…Charities Aid Foundat…The Pfizer Foundation…The Blackbaud Giving …The Bank of America C…Vanguard Charitable E…
The Philadelphia FoundationPA21.5× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Philadelphia Foundation · United Way of Greater Philadelphia and Southern New Jersey · Rite Aid Healthy Futures · W W Smith Charitable Trust · Pennsylvania Automotive Association Foundation · The Cigna Group Foundation · The William Penn Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Asociacion de Puertorriquenos En Marcha Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Asociacion de Puertorriquenos En Marcha Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    14report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 40 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2017, released 2017. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports $1.5M of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2017, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Asociacion de Puertorriquenos En Marcha’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home