Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants — funding profile →
Plinth

· Public charity

Asociacion de Puertorriquenos En Marcha Inc

To promote the welfare of puerto rican / latino residents of the greater philadelphia area through their health, human serivces and community development programs.

$14M
Granted FY2017
41
Grants FY2017
4
States reached
$1.1M
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01FY2017 · 41 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 41 grants below total $9,570,894 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $13,632,639 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $4,061,745 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2017

  • Under $10k1 grant · $9k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $168k
  • $50k–250k23 grants · $2.7M
  • $250k+11 grants · $6.7M
$121,899
Median grant
4
States reached
$41M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CATHOLIC SOCIAL SERVICES$1,067,973
PROGRESSIVE LIFE CENTER$901,284
CARSON VALLEY CHILDREN'S AID$888,281
A SECOND CHANCE$850,755
CHILD FIRST SERVICES INC$618,721
GEORGE JUNIOR Of PA$557,669
WOODS SERVICES$495,372
CHILDREN'S CHOICE$374,005
BETHANY CHRISTIAN SERVICES$345,679
TABOR CHILDREN'S SERVICES$313,188
CONCILIO$294,273
NORTHERN CHILDREN SERVICES$222,241
VISION QUEST NATIONAL LTD$193,229
BETHANNA$157,422
FIRST CHOICE HOME AND COMMUNITY SERVICES$144,301
02The need
02

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–17, $3.7M) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 82% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%WOODS SERVICES: $495k → 6%CONCERN: $61k → 11%A SECOND CHANCE: $851k → 11%FRIENDSHIP HOUSE: $123k → 13%CHILDREN'S CHOICE: $374k → 12%BETHANNA: $157k → 6%TURNING POINTS FOR CHILDREN: $50k → 22%ELWYN: $95k → 10%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES: $122k → 22%NEW FOUNDATIONS INC: $74k → 22%TABOR CHILDREN'S SERVICES: $313k → 22%NORTHERN CHILDREN SERVICES: $222k → 22%METHODIST SERVICES: $134k → 22%CHILD FIRST SERVICES INC: $619k → 22%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Philhaven

Philhaven promotes hope, healing and wholeness through the provision of behavioral resources.

Health
2
Family and Children's Services of Centra

To transform the lives of children and adults by providing opportunities to build self-confidence, resilience and hope.

Human Services
3
Pinebrook Family Answers

The agency's mission states "pinebrook family answers nurtures and empowers children, adults and families by providing mental health services and community-based programs throughout the greater lehigh valley. we do this through initiatives…

Human Services
4
Bethesda Children's Home

Bethesda's vision is to fulfill the social, emotional, spiritual, and behavioral health needs of children, families, and individuals by providing an effective and efficient continuum of care in a quality focused environment.

Human Services
5
Preferred Behavioral Health of Nj Inc

To deliver quality and compassionate behavioral health services to individuals and families all the time through a trauma informed care philosophy and approach.

Health
6
Citrus Health Network Inc

To provide primary care and behavioral health services to children, adults, and families in south florida across a broad range of health services and community-based programs; and to oversee the coordinated child welfare system of care…

—
7
Wesley Family Services

To empower children, adults and families by providing transformational quality whole person care.

Human Services
8
Pathways Youth and Family Services Inc

Pathways' mission is: transforming lives, families and communities.

Human Services
9
Community Care

To provide quality community-based services that are timely and effective in promoting the health and well being of individuals and their families.

Human Services
10
Nexus-Path Family Healing

Strengthening lives, families, and communities through our cornerstone values.

Human Services
11
Alternatives Inc

Alternatives, inc was established to provide comprehensive services to individuals/families with special needs to enable them to reach their highest level of independence and integration into the community.

Human Services
12
The Children's Home Inc

Provides residential and community services to promote long-term well-being and success for young people and families who experience disruption in their lives.

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Children's Home of Easton Inc and the most unlike its peers is Catholic Social Services. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 55 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number20%0%<5yr14%0%5–10yr19%3%10–20yr19%13%20–35yr13%33%35–55yr16%50%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value20%0%<5yr14%0%5–10yr19%0%10–20yr19%20%20–35yr13%28%35–55yr16%52%55yr+

The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 3% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
3%1/40
the rest of the field
11%
4,147/36,326

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

03the grantee network

31 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 31 of the 40 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
30/31
Grantees still filing
24/31
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Catholic Social Services — $1,067,973 · OtherCatholic Social ServicesPROGRESSIVE LIFE CENTER INC — $901,284 · OtherPROGRESSIVE LIFE CENTER INCBETHANY CHRISTIAN SERVICES — $345,679 · OtherBETHANY CHRISTIAN SERVICESCOUNCIL OF SPANISH SPEAKING ORGANIZATIONS INC — $294,273 · OtherCOUNCIL OF SPANISH SPEAKING ORGANIZATIONS INCVisionQuest — $193,229 · OtherFIRST CHOICE HOME AND COMMUNITY SERVICES — $144,301 · OtherPRESBYTERIAN CHILDRENS SERVICES — $140,941 · OtherSPECTRUM COMMUNITY SERVICES INC — $136,214 · Other+9 more — $670,685 · Other+9 moreA SECOND CHANCE INC — $850,755 · Human ServicesA SECOND CHANCE INCCHILDFIRST SERVICES INC — $618,721 · Human ServicesCHILDFIRST SERVICES INCWoods Services Inc — $495,372 · Human ServicesWoods Services IncCHILDREN'S CHOICE INC — $374,005 · Human ServicesCHILDREN'S CHOICE INCTabor Children's Services Inc — $313,188 · Human ServicesTabor Children's Services IncNorthern Children's Services — $222,241 · Human ServicesNorthern Children's ServicesBETHANNA — $157,422 · Human ServicesMETHODIST SERVICES — $134,270 · Human Services+6 more — $524,707 · Human Services+6 moreCarson Valley Children's Aid — $888,281 · HealthCarson Valley Childre…GEORGE JUNIOR REPUBLIC IN PENNSYLVANIA — $557,669 · HealthGEORGE JUNIOR REPUBLI…NORTHEAST TREATMENT CENTERS INC — $132,317 · HealthNORTHEAST TREATMENT C…THE THERAPEUTIC CENTER AT FOX CHASE AKA THE BRIDGE — $121,803 · HealthTHE THERAPEUTIC CENTE…+2 more — $102,937 · Health+2 morePHMC Integrated — $142,340 · EducationBEING BEAUTIFUL FOUNDATION — $23,638 · EducationCOMMUNITY SPECIALISTS CORPORATION — $16,649 · Crime & Legal
Other$3,894,579Human Services$3,690,681Health$1,803,007Education$165,978Crime & Legal$16,649

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCatholic Social Services — $1,067,973 over 1y, 4.3% of budgetPROGRESSIVE LIFE CENTER INC — $901,284 over 1y, 4.9% of budgetCarson Valley Children's Aid — $888,281 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetA SECOND CHANCE INC — $850,755 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetCHILDFIRST SERVICES INC — $618,721 over 1y, 6.7% of budgetGEORGE JUNIOR REPUBLIC IN PENNSYLVANIA — $557,669 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetWoods Services Inc — $495,372 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCHILDREN'S CHOICE INC — $374,005 over 1y, 4.2% of budgetTabor Children's Services Inc — $313,188 over 1y, 5.8% of budgetCOUNCIL OF SPANISH SPEAKING ORGANIZATIONS INC — $294,273 over 1y, 8.1% of budgetNorthern Children's Services — $222,241 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetBETHANNA — $157,422 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetPHMC Integrated — $142,340 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSPECTRUM COMMUNITY SERVICES INC — $136,214 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetMETHODIST SERVICES — $134,270 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetNORTHEAST TREATMENT CENTERS INC — $132,317 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetFRIENDSHIP HOUSE — $122,603 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICE OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA — $121,899 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetTHE THERAPEUTIC CENTER AT FOX CHASE AKA THE BRIDGE — $121,803 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetYOUTH SERVICE INC — $120,460 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetJUVENILE JUSTICE CENTER OF PHILA — $108,270 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetELWYN OF PENNSYLVANIA AND DELAWARE — $95,148 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEW FOUNDATIONS INC — $73,625 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetConcern - Professional Services for Children Youth And Families — $61,393 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetThe Devereux Foundation — $58,407 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTURNING POINTS FOR CHILDREN — $50,039 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAssessment & Treatment Alternatives Inc — $44,530 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetBEING BEAUTIFUL FOUNDATION — $23,638 over 1y, 6.2% of budgetPATH (PEOPLE ACTING TO HELP) INC — $19,898 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY SPECIALISTS CORPORATION — $16,649 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Philadelphia Foun…United Way of Greater…Rite Aid Healthy Futu…W W Smith Charitable …Pennsylvania Automoti…The Cigna Group Found…The William Penn Foun…Charities Aid Foundat…The Pfizer Foundation…The Blackbaud Giving …The Bank of America C…Vanguard Charitable E…
The Philadelphia FoundationPA21.5× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Philadelphia Foundation · United Way of Greater Philadelphia and Southern New Jersey · Rite Aid Healthy Futures · W W Smith Charitable Trust · Pennsylvania Automotive Association Foundation · The Cigna Group Foundation · The William Penn Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Asociacion de Puertorriquenos En Marcha Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    14report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 40 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2017, released 2017. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports $1.5M of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2017, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home
    State money flows
    the interactive map of money crossing state lines