Skip to content
Asianetwork Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Asianetwork Inc

Educational asian studies development; to promote the study of asia on member campuses; send faculty and students to asia; annual conference; publish journal; asianetwork exchange; send consultants to member campuses.

$316k
Granted FY2024still arriving
13
Grants FY2024still arriving
12
States reached
$38k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$2.0MRecreation & Sports$25k
02FY2024 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 13 grants below total $241,586, the rows itemized in this filing. The $315,500 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $73,914 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k4 grants · $29k
  • $10k–50k9 grants · $213k
$10,000
Median grant
12
States reached
$2.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SOUTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY$38,000
KNOX COLLEGE$38,000
TRINITY UNIVERSITY$38,000
WEBSTER UNIVERSITY$29,500
UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL ARKANSAS$29,253
COLGATE UNIVERSITY$10,000
ROANOKE COLLEGE$10,000
UNIVERSITY OF FINDLAY$10,000
CARLETON COLLEGE$10,000
LUTHER COLLEGE$9,580
ROSE HULMAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY$7,853
RHODES COLLEGE$5,700
THE COLLEGE OF NEW JERSEY$5,700
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 68% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%College of Idaho: $30k → 11%Coll of St Benedict & St John's Univ: $25k → 11%Dickinson College: $35k → 8%Gettysburg College: $25k → 9%Slippery Rock University: $35k → 9%MORAVIAN UNIVERSITY: $38k → 11%BUCKNELL UNIVERSITY: $44k → 11%SCRIPPS COLLEGE: $24k → 14%Hofstra University: $25k → 6%SKIDMORE COLLEGE: $25k → 7%ST LAWRENCE UNIVERSITY: $40k → 18%SOUTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY: $38k → 6%Austin College: $40k → 11%TRINITY UNIVERSITY: $38k → 16%COASTAL CAROLINA UNIVERSITY: $20k → 13%UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL ARKANSAS: $29k → 15%New College of Florida: $40k → 10%ECKERD COLLEGE: $24k → 12%Hope College: $25k → 10%WEBSTER UNIVERSITY: $30k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-WHITEWATER: $25k → 10%Lewis and Clark College: $40k → 12%The University of the South: $31k → 13%Saint Mary's College: $30k → 13%University of Findlay: $20k → 9%DENNISON UNIVERSITY: $60k → 10%Kenyon College: $40k → 12%WILMINGTON COLLEGE: $38k → 12%Seattle University: $30k → 9%North Central College: $40k → 7%LAKE FOREST COLLEGE: $39k → 8%KNOX COLLEGE: $38k → 15%MONMOUTH COLLEGE: $35k → 16%The College of New Jersey: $25k → 11%Mayville State University: $40k → 9%Roanoke College: $40k → 8%RANDOLPH COLLEGE: $25k → 8%BEREA COLLEGE: $20k → 16%Bowdoin College: $40k → 7%Slippery Rock University: $29k → 9%MORAVIAN UNIVERSITY: $38k → 11%ST LAWRENCE UNIVERSITY: $40k → 18%Austin College: $40k → 11%NEW COLLEGE OF FLORIDA: $40k → 10%Lewis and Clark College: $40k → 12%KNOX COLLEGE: $38k → 15%Monmouth College: $25k → 16%ROANOKE COLLEGE: $40k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
WA
ID
ND
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
OR
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CA
MO
KY
VA
AR
TN
NC
SC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

46%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$917k · 14 repeat orgs$1.1M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +20% since the first grant, against +19% for those funded once.

14 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2024, 9 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
30

Total granted

$917k
$914k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+20%
+19%

Still filing today

86%
73%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 31% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $168k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LEWIS & CLARK COLLEGE
    4× · 2017–2022 · $120k · revenue +35%
  • ST LAWRENCE UNIVERSITY
    2× · 2022–2023 · $80k · revenue +2%
  • KC
    KNOX COLLEGE
    2× · 2023–2024 · $76k · revenue +21%

Funded once

  • DU
    DENISON UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2021 · $60k · revenue +1%
  • Bucknell University
    one grant, 2023 · $44k · revenue +12%
  • NC
    North Central College
    one grant, 2019 · $40k · revenue +11%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Wilson College

Wilson college empowers students to be confident and critical thinkers, creative visionaries, effective communicators, honorable leaders, and agents of justice.

Education
2
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
3
President and Trustees of Bates College

Bates is a college of the liberal arts and sciences, and is a coeducational, nonsectarian, residential college with special commitments to academic rigor, and to assuring in all of its efforts the dignity of each individual, and access to…

Education
4
Simpson College

Through innovative learning opportunities, individual student attention, and an unwavering commitment to inclusive educational access, simpson college cultivates a diverse community of learners to lead lives of meaning and purpose.

Education
5
Albright College

As a diverse community of learners, we cultivate integrity, curiosity, connection and resilience.

Education
6
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
7
The President and Trustees of Colby College

to provide a rigorous and transformative liberal arts education that prepares students to become thoughtful, engaged citizens.

Education
8
Roger Williams University

At Roger Williams University, students are prepared to be thinkers and doers ready to solve challenging problems with innovative solutions. RWU offers robust offerings of undergraduate, graduate and professional programs across eight…

Education
9
LaGrange College

Education - lagrange college challenges the minds and inspires the souls of its students. founded in 1831 and committed to its relationship with the united methodist church and its wesleyan and liberal arts traditions, the college supports…

Education
10
Greensboro College

Greensboro College provides a liberal arts education grounded in the traditions of the United Methodist Church and fosters the intellectual, social, and spiritual development of all students while supporting their individual needs.

Education
11
Sarah Lawrence College

At sarah lawrence college, our mission is to graduate citizens of the world who are diverse in every definition of the word, who take intellectual and creative risks, and who are able to focus exceptional intellectual discipline (continued…

Education
12
Augustana College

Rooted in the liberal arts & sciences & lutheran expression of the christian faith, & is committed to offering a challenging education that develops qualities of mind, spirit, & body necessary for a rewarding life of leadership & service…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Carleton College; the most unlike its peers is Seattle University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

42 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 42 of the 52 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
42/42
Grantees still filing
32/42
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

LEWIS & CLARK COLLEGE: $119,600 · EducationLEWIS & CLARK COLLEGEROANOKE COLLEGE: $90,000 · EducationROANOKE COLLEGEAUSTIN COLLEGE: $80,000 · EducationST LAWRENCE UNIVERSITY: $80,000 · EducationKNOX COLLEGE: $76,000 · EducationKENYON COLLEGE: $60,000 · EducationDENISON UNIVERSITY: $60,000 · EducationMONMOUTH COLLEGE: $60,000 · EducationWARREN WILSON COLLEGE: $52,850 · Education+30 more: $856,490 · Education+30 moreMORAVIAN UNIVERSITY: $76,000 · OtherMORAVIAN UNIVERSITYSlippery Rock University: $63,965 · OtherSlippery Rock UniversityNew College of Florida: $40,000 · OtherNew College of FloridaNEW COLLEGE OF FLORIDA: $40,000 · OtherNEW COLLEGE OF FLORIDAMAYVILLE STATE UNIVERSITY: $40,000 · OtherMAYVILLE STATE UNIVERSITYCOASTAL CAROLINA UNIVERSITY: $39,956 · OtherCOASTAL CAROLINA UNIVERSIT…THE COLLEGE OF NEW JERSEY: $30,700 · OtherTHE COLLEGE OF NEW JERSEYSEATTLE UNIVERSITY: $30,400 · OtherSEATTLE UNIVERSITYSaint Mary's College: $30,000 · OtherSaint Mary's CollegeUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-WHITEWATER: $24,900 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-WH…COASTAL CAROLINA UNIVERSITY: $20,000 · OtherSAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY: $19,850 · Other+1 more: $7,853 · Other
Education$1,534,940Other$463,624

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLEWIS & CLARK COLLEGE: $119,600 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetROANOKE COLLEGE: $90,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAUSTIN COLLEGE: $80,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetST LAWRENCE UNIVERSITY: $80,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetKNOX COLLEGE: $76,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMORAVIAN UNIVERSITY: $76,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetKENYON COLLEGE: $60,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDENISON UNIVERSITY: $60,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMONMOUTH COLLEGE: $60,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetWARREN WILSON COLLEGE: $52,850 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetThe University of Findlay: $50,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHOPE COLLEGE: $49,525 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBucknell University: $44,030 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNorth Central College: $40,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBowdoin College: $40,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLake Forest College: $39,014 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWilmington College: $38,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSOUTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY: $38,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTrinity University: $38,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDICKINSON COLLEGE: $35,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF THE SOUTH: $30,827 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSEATTLE UNIVERSITY: $30,400 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe College of Idaho Inc: $30,265 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWebster University: $29,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL AR FOUNDATION INC: $29,253 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCARLETON COLLEGE: $28,283 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSKIDMORE COLLEGE: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOLLEGE OF SAINT BENEDICT: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOFSTRA UNIVERSITY: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGETTYSBURG COLLEGE: $24,869 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRANDOLPH COLLEGE INC: $24,838 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetEckerd College: $24,400 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetScripps College: $24,080 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBEREA COLLEGE: $20,010 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNION COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY: $19,736 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHOBART AND WILLIAM SMITH COLLEGES: $19,400 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWASHINGTON & JEFFERSON COLLEGE: $19,196 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOLGATE UNIVERSITY: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLUTHER COLLEGE: $9,580 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRose-Hulman Institute of Technology: $7,853 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRhodes College: $5,700 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Tulsa Community Found…American Chemical Soc…Ibm International Fou…Shell USA Company Fou…Ge Aerospace Foundati…Charities Aid Foundat…Morgan Stanley Global…American Endowment Fo…Natl Christian Charit…The Bank of America C…Vanguard Charitable E…American Online Givin…
Tulsa Community FoundationOK14.3× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Tulsa Community Foundation · American Chemical Society · Ibm International Foundation · Shell USA Company Foundation · Ge Aerospace Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Asianetwork Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Asianetwork Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • Lewis & Clark College: 2% of income from government
  • Eckerd College: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 52 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports $257k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2024, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Asianetwork’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home