How much did Asian Americans Advancing Justice - grant in FY2023?

Asian Americans Advancing Justice - reported 14 grants totaling $1,389,404 in its FY2023 IRS filing.

Where is Asian Americans Advancing Justice - based?

Asian Americans Advancing Justice - is based in CA.

Asian Americans Advancing Justice -

Foundation Dossiers Mostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →

· Public charity

Asian Americans Advancing Justice -

The mission of AAAJ-ALC is to promote, advance, and represent the legal and civil rights of Asian Pacific Islander (API) communities, recognizing that social, economic, political and racial inequalities continue to exist in the United States.

$1.4M

Granted FY2023

Grants

Communities

$356k

Largest

01What you fund

0190% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2018–2023.

Civil Rights$1.6MHuman Services$1.6MHousing & Shelter$387kCommunity Improvement$245kCrime & Legal$219kYouth Development$175kArts & Culture$167kPublic Benefit$155kEmployment$130kOther$689k

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2019

securityhousingimpactnative hawaiianshawaiians islandersfoodimmigrants

2020

census outreachsecurityhousingadvocacy organizingimmigrantstenantmembers

2021

workersimmigrationworkingvoting electionbuildingsolidaritycultural

2022

anti-asian hatehate subgrantaaaj anti-asiansubgrant affiliationhate leadersregrant anti-asianaffiliation anti-asian

2023

open subgrantcdss pursuantanti-asian hateregrantosftable

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2023 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2023

Under $10k1 grant · $7k
$10k–50k2 grants · $30k
$50k–250k10 grants · $987k
$250k+1 grant · $356k

$100,000

Median grant

States reached

$32M

Total assets

Largest grants

National Korean American Service and Education Consortium Inc$356,250
The Fresno Center$133,378
Chinese for Affirmative Action$133,129
Jubilee Immigration Advocates$123,206
State Power Fund$100,000
Asian Americans United$100,000
Asian Americans Advancing Justice - Atlanta$100,000
NEO Philanthropy Inc$100,000
Asian Community Development Council$80,000
Dolores Street Community Service$67,142
One Arizona$50,000
Adhikaar for Human Rights and Social Justice$20,000
Mekong Inc$10,000
Partnership for the Advancement of New Americans$7,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–23, $1.5M) land where the poverty rate runs at 14% — the area typically sits at 10%. 94% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

77%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$4.1M · 21 repeat orgs$1.3M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +191% since the first grant, against +102% for the ones you funded once.

21 repeat relationships — 12 still active in FY2023, 9 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$4.1M

$1.1M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+191%

+102%

Still filing today

95%

87%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $180k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Human ServicesCivil RightsCommunity ImprovementArts & CultureCrime & LegalHealthOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

Chinese for Affirmative Action
3× · 2021–2023 · $713k · revenue +411%
TF
The Fresno Center
3× · 2021–2023 · $609k · revenue +382%
JI
Jubilee Immigration Advocates
3× · 2021–2023 · $525k · revenue +74% · 29% of their budget

Funded once

Urban Affairs Coalitiongraduated
one grant, 2022 · $65k · revenue +119%
CO
Council on American-Islamic Relationsgraduated
one grant, 2022 · $57k · revenue +186%
EV
Every Voice Texasgraduated
one grant, 2022 · $51k · revenue +2763%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Asian Americans Advancing Justice -

Crime & Legal

Asian American Advocacy Alliance

Community Improvement

Aapi Equity Alliance

Aapi equity alliance is a coalition of community-based organizations that advocates for the rights and needs of the asian and pacific islander (api) community in the greater los angeles area, with particular focus on low-income, immigrant,…

Human Services

Asian Immigrant Women Advocates Inc

Asian Immigrant Women Advocates empowers low-income, limited English speaking immigrant women and youth through education, leadership development and civic participation programs.

Human Services

Asian Pacific American Legal

To advance the legal and civil rights of Asian Pacific Americans through direct services, education and advocacy.

Crime & Legal

Asian AmericansPacific Islanders in

AAPIP expands and mobilizes resources for AAPI communities to build a more just and equitable society.

Philanthropy

Committee Against Anti-Asian Violence Inc

CAAAV was founded in 1986 as one of the first groups in the United States to respond to racially motivated violence against Asians. Since then, CAAAV has broaden its focus to address a wide array of needs and challenges facing the Asian…

Civil Rights

Equal Justice Center

The Equal Justice Center is a non-profit law firm and employment justice organization which empowers low-income families, workers, and communities to achieve fair treatment in the workplace, in the justice system, and in our shared society…

Civil Rights

Coalition of Asian American Leaders

The Coalition of Asian American Leaders (CAAL) is a network organization of Asian Minnesotan leaders harnessing our collective power to improve the lives of community.

Arts & Culture

Asian American Legal Defense and

A national organization that protects & promotes the civil rights of asian americans.

—

Asian Pacific Islander American Public

Advancing the AANHPI communities through increased leadership and civic engagement.

Civil Rights

Alliance for Asian American Justice Inc

Coordinate pro bono legal assistance for victims of anti-Asian violence

Civil Rights

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Asian Americans Advancing Justice and the most unlike its peers is Tides Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side

Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 27 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

0.0%0/68

the rest of the field

12%

22,290/186,910

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

61 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

61/61

Grantees still filing

55/61

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Civil Rights$1,635,941Human Services$1,567,451Other$1,141,400Housing & Shelter$386,912Community Improvement$245,000Crime & Legal$219,000Youth Development$175,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Amalgamated Charitable Foundation IncDC47.9× affinity26 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc · Gofundmeorg · Proteus Fund Inc · NEO Philanthropy Inc · Asian Americans Advancing Justice · Immigrant Legal Resource Center · Tides Foundation · East Bay Community Foundation · Tides Center · New Venture Fund · The San Francisco Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation Asian Americans Advancing Justice - funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

1get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: Jubilee Immigration Advocates.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

medium risk

~5 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 5 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

5 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up +74% since.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 474144825 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on Jubilee Immigration Advocates, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

WatchFinancial stability— Roughly 5 months of cash on hand.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 29% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Asian Americans Advancing Justice -?

Find your warmest path to Asian Americans Advancing Justice - through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

Asian Americans Advancing Justice -

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

61 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Asian Americans Advancing Justice -?

More from the funding graph

Asian Americans Advancing Justice -

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

61 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Asian Americans Advancing Justice -?

More from the funding graph