· Private foundation
Ashley Family Foundation Inc
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k18 grants · $37k
- $10k–50k2 grants · $20k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $185k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| SUNY COLLEGE AT ONEONTA FOUNDATION | $185,000 |
| UNITED WAY | $10,000 |
| ALLENDALE COLUMBIA SCHOOL | $10,000 |
| THE BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF ROCHESTER | $5,000 |
| GREEN MOUNTAIN CLUB | $5,000 |
| THE CURRENT | $5,000 |
| GENESEE COUNTRY VILLAGE & MUSEUM | $2,500 |
| IMMIGRANT JUSTICE CORPS | $2,500 |
| SOUTHSIDE EARLY CHILDHOOD CENTER | $2,500 |
| HOMESTEADS FOR HOPE | $2,000 |
| ROCHESTER REFUGEE RESETTLEMENT SERVICES | $2,000 |
| FOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES | $1,250 |
| NOLS SCHOLARSHIP FUND | $1,250 |
| EAGLE RIVER COALITION | $1,250 |
| THE COLORADO TRAIL FOUNDATION | $1,250 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $24k) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +57% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.
34 repeat relationships — 18 still active in FY2025, 16 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- ACALLENDALE COLUMBIA SCHOOL9× · 2017–2025 · $101k · revenue +46%
UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER4× · 2017–2020 · $100k · revenue +81%- BABOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF ROCHESTER INC7× · 2019–2025 · $35k · revenue +79%
Funded once
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2023 · $100k
- RRPOone grant, 2020 · $15k
- MHMASSACHUSETTS HORTICULTURAL SOCIETYone grant, 2024 · $10k · revenue 0%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Rochester general health system, provides patient care, senior housing, laboratory services, and community outreach to residents and other clients in monroe county, new york and several surrounding counties.
To provide clean, safe, well maintained, and affordable apartments and townhouses, suitable for anyone, in many locations throughout rochester, new york.
The rochester general college of health careers is dedicated to preparing adult learners with the knowledge, skills, and competencies necessary to pursue health careers, advanced education, and lifelong learning.
NeighborWorks Rochester collaborates with people and partners to strengthen, sustain and promote city neighborhoods. Our services are available to a wide spectrum of the community, including existing and potential homeowners, tenants and…
To lead a network of partners to alleviate hunger, prevent food waste, and nourish the communities we serve. our vision is that all people have the nutritious food they need to thrive.
Greater rochester housing partnership, inc. (grhp) was established primarily to provide financing for affordable housing to social services and housing agencies, either directly or by participating with banks, in the rochester, new york…
New york restoration project ("nyrp") believes that nature is a fundamental right of every new yorker. nyrp works collaboratively with residents in communities across the five boroughs to renovate gardens, restore parks, plant trees,…
To raise and manage funds in support of united memorial medical center and it's affiliates.
The company's mission is to create new jobs, increase regional wealth, raise regional gdp and enhance opportunity; to invest in a world-class economic development ecosystem where incumbent businesses are thriving, new firms are locating,…
United way of greater rochester's mission is to unite the good will and resources of the greater rochester community so that everyone can thrive. united way supports a broad network of human service organizations, community initiatives and…
To create dialogue and build community through contemporary art exhibitions and related programs
Rochester art center offers the opportunity for all people to understand and value the arts through innovative experiences with contemporary art. through world-class exhibitions and programs, we present a welcoming, integrated, and diverse…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is East House Corporation and the most unlike its peers is World Bicycle Relief Nfp. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 36 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
42 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 42 of the 64 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds ALLENDALE COLUMBIA SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER ↗
- Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF ROCHESTER INC ↗
- Who funds GENESEE COUNTRY MUSEUM ↗
- Who funds THE GREEN MOUNTAIN CLUB INC DEBONIS ↗
- Who funds BLADDER CANCER ADVOCACY NETWORK INC ↗
- Who funds Genesee Valley Conservancy Inc ↗
- Who funds Honeoye-Richmond Historical Society ↗
- Who funds SOUTHSIDE EARLY CHILDHOOD CENTER ↗
- Who funds HOMESTEADS FOR HOPE INC ↗
- Who funds The Colorado Trail Foundation ↗
- Who funds THE CURRENT INC ↗
- Who funds MASSACHUSETTS HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
- Who funds MEAL & MORE INC ↗
- Who funds ROCOVERY FITNESS INC ↗
- Who funds MOSTLY MODERN PROJECTS INC ↗
- Who funds ADIRONDACK MOUNTAIN CLUB INC ↗
- Who funds RURAL & MIGRANT MINISTRY INC ↗
- Who funds FOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES ↗
- Who funds EAGLE RIVER WATERSHED COUNCIL ↗
- Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
- Who funds GENERATE HEALTH STL ↗
- Who funds IMMIGRANT JUSTICE CORPS INC ↗
- Who funds PERSON CENTERED HOUSING OPTIONS INC ↗
- Who funds LEGAL SERVICES OF EASTERN MISSOURI INC ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF GREATER ST LOUIS INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Rochester Area Community Foundation · Max and Marian Farash Charitable Foundation · United Way of Greater Rochester and the Finger Lakes Inc · Esl Charitable Foundation · Greater Rochester Health Foundation · Paychex Charitable Foundation Inc · Daisy Marquis Jones Foundation · Davenport-Hatch Foundation · The Polisseni Foundation Inc · William & Sheila Konar Foundation · St Louis Community Foundation · JM McDonald Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Ashley Family Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- The Green Mountain Club Inc Debonis — 17% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Ashley Family Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to Ashley Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.