Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Ashish and Sugeeta Kohli Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$6k
Granted FY2025still arriving
2
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202025.

Human Services$9kAnimals$8kFood & Nutrition$5kReligion$5kHousing & Shelter$4kYouth Development$4kPhilanthropy$1k
02FY2025 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$5,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$90k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
RADHA MADHAV SOCIETY$5,000
AS GOOD AS GOLD-GOLDEN RETREIVER RESCUE OF ILLINOIS$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–22, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%COMMIT2CHANGE: $1k → 9%COMMIT2CHANGE: $1k → 9%COMMIT2CHANGE: $1k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

61%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$21k · 4 repeat orgs$14k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +149% since the first grant, against +33% for the ones you funded once.

4 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
5

Total granted

$21k
$9k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+149%
+33%

Still filing today

100%
60%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 17% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesAnimalsFood & NutritionHousing & ShelterEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AG
    AS GOOD AS GOLD - GOLDEN RETRIEVER RESCUE OF ILLINOIS INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $8k · revenue +31%
  • HI
    HELPUSADOPTORG INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $6k · revenue +291%
  • AG
    APNA GHAR INC
    4× · 2020–2023 · $4k · revenue +148%

Funded once

  • SH
    SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK OF ORANGE COUNTY INC
    2× · 2020–2021 · $5k · revenue +3%
  • NS
    NORTH SUBURBAN YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $1k · revenue +33%
  • SC
    SAHARA - CARING FOR SOUTH ASIAN COMMUNITY
    2× · 2020–2021 · $1k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Educate Girls

Educate Girls promotes and protects the right of girls to a quality education and works by supporting partners in geographies where the need is greatest to mobilize communities, enroll girls into school and improve learning outcomes. Our…

International
2
Sister India Ltd

Sister India provides a holistic program, protecting and uplifting women and girls, ending trafficking, child marriages and child labor, lifting families from poverty, and ensuring girls can go to school instead. We research effective…

International
3
Kiran Anjali Project

To invest in educational programs in India to equip girls to define their own destiny.

International
4
Alliance for Girls

to prepare today's girls to be the leaders, agents of change, and thriving women of tomorrow. We mobilize girls' champions to address barriers facing girls, create conditions for their success, and advance systemic change to achieve equity.

Youth Development
5
Invisible Girl Project

Invisible girl project's (igp) mission is to save girls' lives and end female gendercide in india. igp raises global awareness about this issue, partners with indian organizations that rescue and care for vulnerable girls, pursues justice,…

International
6
Fflv Usa

Food for life vrindavan has been working in india since 1991. our work includes free meal distribution, cleaning and tree planting, paper recycling , organic farming, and a sewing and embroidery centre (providing training & employment…

International
7
Girls Incorporated of San Antonio

Girls Inc. inspires all girls to be strong, smart, and bold. Our comprehensive approach to whole girl development equips girls to navigate gender, economic, and social barriers and grow up healthy, educated, and independent.

Human Services
8
Akshaya Patra Foundation (Usa)

The mission of the foundation is to simultaneously address childhood hunger and malnutrition and to promote education for children throughout india.

Food & Nutrition
9
Shadhika Project

Shadhika believes in a future where each person in India can choose their own path to meaning, purpose, and happiness. Through global philanthropy and in-country programming, Shadhika believes that education is the most effective vehicle…

10
Rescue Pink Inc

To provide resources and funding for qualifying organizations and children's homes whose mission is to rescue baby girls in india from gendercide.

International
11
Together for Girls

We envision a world where every child, adolescent and young person is safe, protected and thriving. every person, including every child and adolescent, has the right to live free from violence and everyone has a role to play in making this…

International
12
Ensaaf

Ensaaf, which means "justice" in many south Asian languages, works to end impunity and achieve justice for crimes against humanity in India, with a focus on Punjab, by documenting abuses, bringing perpetrators to justice, and organizing…

International

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Dallas Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Helpusadoptorg Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
7/8
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

HELPUSADOPTORG INC — $6,000 · Human ServicesHELPUSADOPTORG INCCOMMIT-2-CHANGE — $3,000 · Human ServicesCOMMIT-2-CHANGERADHA MADHAV SOCIETY — $5,000 · OtherRADHA MADHAV SOCIETYNORTH SUBURBAN YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION — $1,000 · OtherNORTH SUBURBAN YOUNG MEN'…SAHARA - CARING FOR SOUTH ASIAN COMMUNITY — $1,000 · OtherSAHARA - CARING FOR SOUTH…HOMEAID LOS ANGELES — $1,000 · OtherHOMEAID LOS ANGELESAS GOOD AS GOLD - GOLDEN RETRIEVER RESCUE OF ILLINOIS INC — $7,500 · AnimalsAS GOOD AS GOLD - GOLDEN…SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK OF ORANGE COUNTY INC — $5,000 · Food & NutritionSECOND HARVEST F…APNA GHAR INC — $4,400 · Housing & ShelterAPNA GHAR INCTHE DALLAS FOUNDATION — $1,000 · PhilanthropyMilaan Foundation — $500 · Education
Human Services$9,000Other$8,000Animals$7,500Food & Nutrition$5,000Housing & Shelter$4,400Philanthropy$1,000Education$500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetAS GOOD AS GOLD - GOLDEN RETRIEVER RESCUE OF ILLINOIS INC — $7,500 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetHELPUSADOPTORG INC — $6,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK OF ORANGE COUNTY INC — $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAPNA GHAR INC — $4,400 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMIT-2-CHANGE — $3,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetTHE DALLAS FOUNDATION — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNORTH SUBURBAN YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMilaan Foundation — $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Chicago Community TrustIL12.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Chicago Community Trust · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Network for Good · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Ashish and Sugeeta Kohli Family Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Ashish and Sugeeta Kohli Family Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Ashish and Sugeeta Kohli Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 11 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph