Skip to content

· Private foundation

Ashington-Pickett Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$24k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$35kArts & Culture$12kHuman Services$7kEducation$6kHousing & Shelter$6kCivil Rights$4kHealth$3kPublic Benefit$1kOther$0
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k7 grants · $14k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$2,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$207k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Palm Springs Air Museum$10,000
Union Rescue Mission$5,000
The Marriage Forum$5,000
First Presbyterian Church of Orland$2,000
The Rutherford Institute$500
Tunnel to Towers Foundation$500
Thornwell$500
Leadership Institute$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–25, $11k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Union Rescue Mission: $5k → 14%The Marriage Forum: $5k → 14%Thornwell: $500 → 18%THOMAS MORE LAW CENTER: $200 → 14%THORNWELL HOME FOR CHILDREN: $200 → 18%THORNWELL HOME FOR CHILDREN: $200 → 18%THORNWELL HOME FOR CHILDREN: $200 → 18%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
MI
NY
IA
OH
CT
CA
CO
KY
VA
TN
NC
SC
DC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 21% of Ashington-Pickett Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 58% of the giving stays in FL; by stated purpose, 46%.

Ashington-Pickett Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 13% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

63%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$46k · 19 repeat orgs$27k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +45% since the first grant, against +13% for those funded once.

19 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 15 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
23

Total granted

$46k
$7k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+45%
+13%

Still filing today

68%
30%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 15% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesArts & CultureEducationHealthHousing & ShelterPublic BenefitOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TR
    THE RUTHERFORD INSTITUTE
    6× · 2019–2025 · $2k · revenue +74%
  • FF
    FLORIDA FAMILY ASSOCIATION INC
    5× · 2019–2024 · $1k · revenue +2%
  • T
    THORNWELL
    4× · 2019–2025 · $1k · revenue +22%

Funded once

  • HO
    HEART OF THE CITY FOUNDATION - ORLANDO
    one grant, 2017 · $2k
  • W8
    WUCF 899 FM
    one grant, 2020 · $500
  • EP
    EVANGELICAL PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH INC
    one grant, 2019 · $500
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University Inc

Embry-riddle is the world leader in aviation and aerospace higher education. its mission is to teach the science, practice and business of aviation and aerospace, preparing students for productive careers and leadership roles in business,…

Education
2
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
3
American Law Institute

The institute's mission, as set out in its certificate of incorporation, is to promote the clarification and simplification of the law and its better adaptation to social needs, to secure the better administration of justice, and to…

Crime & Legal
4
Augustana College

Rooted in the liberal arts & sciences & lutheran expression of the christian faith, & is committed to offering a challenging education that develops qualities of mind, spirit, & body necessary for a rewarding life of leadership & service…

Education
5
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
6
Loyola Marymount University

Organization's mission loyola marymount university maintains a three-fold mission: 1)the encouragement of learning, 2) the education of the whole person, and 3)the service of faith and the promotion of justice.

Education
7
Washington and Lee University

Mission statement of washington and lee university: washington and lee university provides a liberal arts education that develops students' capacity to think freely, critically, and humanely and to conduct themselves with honor, integrity,…

Education
8
Wilmington University Inc

Wilmington university is committed to excellence in teaching, relevancy of the curriculum, and individual attention to students. as an institution with admissions policies that provide access for all, it offers opportunity for higher…

Education
9
Atlantic University Inc

Provide post-secondary education of excellence.

Education
10
John Jay Institute for Faith Society and Law Inc

To prepare principled leaders for faith-informed public service.

Religion
11
Fielding Graduate University

We provide exemplary interdisciplinary programs for a community of scholar-practitioners within a distributed learning model grounded in student-driven inquiry and leading to enhanced knowledge.

—
12
Wilson College

Wilson college empowers students to be confident and critical thinkers, creative visionaries, effective communicators, honorable leaders, and agents of justice.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Judicial Watch Inc; the most unlike its peers is Hillsdale College. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

25 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 25 of the 47 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
24/25
Grantees still filing
19/25
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH OF ORLANDO: $29,830 · OtherFIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH OF ORLANDOHEART OF THE CITY FOUNDATION INC: $4,000 · OtherHEART OF THE CITY FOUNDATION INCHEART OF THE CITY FOUNDATION - ORLANDO: $2,000 · Other+26 more: $10,075 · Other+26 moreUNION RESCUE MISSION: $5,000 · Human ServicesUNION RESCUE MISSI…THE MARRIAGE FORUM INC: $5,000 · Human ServicesTHE MARRIAGE FORUM…THORNWELL: $1,100 · Human ServicesTHORNWELLTHOMAS MORE LAW CENTER: $950 · Human ServicesTHOMAS MORE LAW CE…+1 more: $10 · Human ServicesPALM SPRINGS AIR MUSEUM INC: $10,000 · Arts & CulturePALM SPRINGS AIR…STATUE OF LIBERTY ELLIS ISLAND FOUNDATION INC: $550 · Arts & Culture+2 more: $125 · Arts & CultureALICE LLOYD COLLEGE: $1,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF THE CUMBERLANDS INC: $750 · EducationSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $600 · EducationHILLSDALE COLLEGE: $550 · EducationFLORIDA FAMILY ASSOCIATION INC: $1,450 · Civil RightsLeadership Institute: $585 · Public BenefitJUDICIAL WATCH INC: $500 · Public BenefitORLANDO UNION RESCUE MISSION INC: $510 · Housing & ShelterMOUNTAIN OUTREACH PROGRAM INC: $250 · Housing & Shelter
Other$45,905Human Services$12,060Arts & Culture$10,675Education$2,900Civil Rights$1,450Public Benefit$1,085Housing & Shelter$760

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPALM SPRINGS AIR MUSEUM INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetUNION RESCUE MISSION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE RUTHERFORD INSTITUTE: $1,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetFLORIDA FAMILY ASSOCIATION INC: $1,450 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetTHORNWELL: $1,100 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetALICE LLOYD COLLEGE: $1,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHOMAS MORE LAW CENTER: $950 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF THE CUMBERLANDS INC: $750 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $600 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLeadership Institute: $585 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHILLSDALE COLLEGE: $550 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSTATUE OF LIBERTY ELLIS ISLAND FOUNDATION INC: $550 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetORLANDO UNION RESCUE MISSION INC: $510 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCHI OMEGA FOUNDATION: $500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJUDICIAL WATCH INC: $500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetOrlando Health Foundation Inc: $450 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMOUNTAIN OUTREACH PROGRAM INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEagle Rock Camp: $250 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetColonial Williamsburg Foundation: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFLORIDA SHERIFFS ASSOCIATION INC: $100 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFlorida Sheriffs Youth Ranches Inc: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE COMMEMORATIVE AIR FORCE: $25 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK OF CENTRAL FLORIDA INC: $20 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAARP FOUNDATION: $10 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds PALM SPRINGS AIR MUSEUM INC ↗
  • Who funds UNION RESCUE MISSION ↗
  • Who funds THE MARRIAGE FORUM INC ↗
  • Who funds THE RUTHERFORD INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds FLORIDA FAMILY ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THORNWELL ↗
  • Who funds ALICE LLOYD COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds THOMAS MORE LAW CENTER ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF THE CUMBERLANDS INC ↗
  • Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Leadership Institute ↗
  • Who funds HILLSDALE COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds STATUE OF LIBERTY ELLIS ISLAND FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds ORLANDO UNION RESCUE MISSION INC ↗
  • Who funds CHI OMEGA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds JUDICIAL WATCH INC ↗
  • Who funds Orlando Health Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds MOUNTAIN OUTREACH PROGRAM INC ↗
  • Who funds Eagle Rock Camp ↗
  • Who funds Colonial Williamsburg Foundation ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Natl Christian Charitable Fdn IncGA12.5× affinity11 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · American Endowment Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Ashington-Pickett Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Ashington-Pickett Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 4%
  • Florida Sheriffs Association Inc: 4% of income from government
  • Second Harvest Food Bank of Central Florida Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 47 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Ashington-Pickett’s filings →

More from the funding graph