Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Asha-Vijay Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$199k
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$39k
Largest
01What you fund
0183% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Education$545kInternational$420kPhilanthropy$258kRecreation & Sports$194kHuman Services$65kHealth$26kCivil Rights$25kArts & Culture$20kOther$0
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $22k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $178k
$15,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$2.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
RUTGERS UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION$39,000
THE ROTARY FOUNDATION$31,500
EKAL VIDYALAYA FOUNDATION USA$27,000
VARIOUS OTHER CHARITIES$24,309
BLIND FOUNDATION FOR INDIA$15,500
Individual grant recipient$15,000
CHILDRENS AID AND FAMILY SERVICES$13,238
VIDYA VIKAS CHARITABLE TRUST$12,000
RIGHT TO PLAY USA$6,500
Individual grant recipient$5,000
TAARA$5,000
CHILDREN'S CANCER RESEARCH FUND$5,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY22–25, $40k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%CHILDRENS AID AND FAMILY SERVICES: $13k → 7%CHILDRENS AID AND FAMILY SERVICES: $10k → 7%CHILDRENS AID AND FAMILY SERVICES: $10k → 7%CHILDRENS AID AND FAMILY SERVICES: $7k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

MN
IL
NY
MA
NJ
CA
SC
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.2M · 11 repeat orgs$211k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of -2% since the first grant, against -11% for the ones you funded once.

11 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
11

Total granted

$1.2M
$157k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-2%
-11%

Still filing today

64%
27%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 68% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $54k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalEducationArts & CultureCivil RightsHuman ServicesPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • VV
    VIDYA VIKAS CHARITABLE TRUST INC
    8× · 2018–2025 · $224k · revenue +420% · 40% of their budget
  • CA
    CHILDREN'S AID AND FAMILY SERVICES INC
    4× · 2022–2025 · $40k · revenue +28%
  • BARNARD COLLEGE
    2× · 2023–2024 · $10k · revenue +13%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2024 · $31k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $27k
  • SA
    SHARE AND CARE FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2019 · $25k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Vidya Girls Education Foundation
Education
2
Vattikuti India Relief Foundation
Philanthropy
3
Vedanta Charitable Foundation
Education
4
India Awareness Foundation Inc

Public education

Education
5
Nalanda 20

Improve excellence and access in higher education. Current focus is on India. Thus, Nalanda 2.0's current focus is to make India's higher education system world-class by building a world-class multidisciplinary research university,…

Education
6
Ek Kadam Aur

Transforming lives of underprivileged children through education, technology, healthcare programs, and connection with a global network of qualified volunteers and mentors.

International
7
Sadvidya Foundation

Education

Religion
8
Forum for Religious Freedom

Foster & protect the religious diversity and pluralism, protecting, preserving, rejuvenating and disseminating information about non aggressive religious traditions

Religion
9
Ravi and Naina Patel Foundation
Philanthropy
10
Satyagraha Foundation
Religion
11
The Rural India Child Education Fund Inc

Educate children in need

Education
12
Ramirez Mukherjee Foundation
Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ekal Vidyalaya Foundation of Usa and the most unlike its peers is The Breakfast Revolution. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
4/13
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

VARIOUS OTHER CHARITIES — $248,171 · OtherVARIOUS OTHER CHARITIESSNF USA FOUNDATION — $187,500 · OtherSNF USA FOUNDATIONIndividual grant recipient — $90,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient — $71,770 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient — $31,406 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $27,241 · OtherSHARE AND CARE FOUNDATION — $25,150 · Other+7 more — $49,330 · Other+7 moreTHE ROTARY FOUNDATION OF ROTARY INTERNATIONAL — $419,500 · InternationalTHE ROTARY FOUNDATION OF ROTARY INTERNATIONALVIDYA VIKAS CHARITABLE TRUST INC — $224,000 · InternationalVIDYA VIKAS CHARITABLE TRUST INCSISTER NIVEDITA FOUNDATION USA INC — $30,500 · InternationalEKAL VIDYALAYA FOUNDATION OF USA — $27,000 · International+2 more — $20,500 · InternationalRUTGERS UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $253,750 · EducationRUTGERS UNIVERSI…BARNARD COLLEGE — $10,000 · EducationCHILDREN'S AID AND FAMILY SERVICES INC — $39,738 · Human ServicesINDIANS FOR COLLECTIVE ACTION — $25,000 · Civil RightsTAARA INC — $15,000 · Arts & CultureVIVEKANANDA VIDYAPITH INC — $5,000 · Arts & CultureCHILDREN'S CANCER RESEARCH FUND — $10,000 · Philanthropy
Other$730,568International$721,500Education$263,750Human Services$39,738Civil Rights$25,000Arts & Culture$20,000Philanthropy$10,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE ROTARY FOUNDATION OF ROTARY INTERNATIONAL — $419,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetRUTGERS UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $253,750 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetVIDYA VIKAS CHARITABLE TRUST INC — $224,000 over 8y, 40% of budgetCHILDREN'S AID AND FAMILY SERVICES INC — $39,738 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSISTER NIVEDITA FOUNDATION USA INC — $30,500 over 2y, 15% of budgetEKAL VIDYALAYA FOUNDATION OF USA — $27,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetINDIANS FOR COLLECTIVE ACTION — $25,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetBLIND FOUNDATION FOR INDIA — $15,500 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetTAARA INC — $15,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetCHILDREN'S CANCER RESEARCH FUND — $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBARNARD COLLEGE — $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetVIVEKANANDA VIDYAPITH INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE ROTARY FOUNDATION OF ROTARY INTERNATIONAL
  • Who funds RUTGERS UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION
  • Who funds VIDYA VIKAS CHARITABLE TRUST INC
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S AID AND FAMILY SERVICES INC
  • Who funds SISTER NIVEDITA FOUNDATION USA INC
  • Who funds EKAL VIDYALAYA FOUNDATION OF USA
  • Who funds INDIANS FOR COLLECTIVE ACTION
  • Who funds BLIND FOUNDATION FOR INDIA
  • Who funds TAARA INC
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S CANCER RESEARCH FUND
  • Who funds BARNARD COLLEGE
  • Who funds THE BREAKFAST REVOLUTION
  • Who funds VIVEKANANDA VIDYAPITH INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Pfizer Foundation IncNY10.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Asha-Vijay Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 40%2%8%17%30%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 1%
  • Children's Aid and Family Services Inc1% of income from government
  • Rutgers University Foundation0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Asha-Vijay Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Asha-Vijay Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph