Skip to content
Asbury Thrift Store Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Asbury Thrift Store Inc

Provide financial assistance to local charitable organizations

$250k
Granted FY2024still arriving
10
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$40k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Housing & Shelter$336kHuman Services$269kInternational$140kFood & Nutrition$118kReligion$113kCrime & Legal$102kYouth Development$92kHealth$35kOther$0
02FY2024 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 10 grants below total $232,500, the rows itemized in this filing. The $249,597 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $17,097 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $13k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $220k
$20,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$3.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
305 8TH STREET$40,000
MANNA HOUSE$40,000
NEW FUTURES INC$40,000
SHEPHERD'S FOLD VILLAGE$35,000
ROYAL FAMILY KIDS CAMP$20,000
HAVEIHOPE INC$20,000
HOUSE OF HARVEST$15,000
FOSTERING CONNECTIONS$10,000
LOADS OF LOVE$6,500
ACADEMY OF LEARNING AND CHARACTER DEVELOPMENT$6,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $518k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%INSIDE-OUT MINISTRIES INC: $26k → 11%INSIDE-OUT MINISTRIES INC: $24k → 11%305 8TH STREET: $42k → 11%305 8TH STREET: $40k → 11%305 8TH STREET: $30k → 11%FOSTERING CONNECTIONS: $10k → 11%305 8TH STREET: $22k → 11%FOSTERING CONNECTIONS: $7k → 11%305 8TH STREET: $11k → 11%ACADEMY OF LEARNING AND CHARACTER DEVELOPMENT: $6k → 11%NEW FUTURES INC: $50k → 11%NEW FUTURES INC: $41k → 11%NEW FUTURES INC: $40k → 11%NEW FUTURES INC: $40k → 11%NEW FUTURES INC: $40k → 11%NEW FUTURES INC: $40k → 11%NEW FUTURES INC: $28k → 11%NEW FUTURES: $22k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.1M · 15 repeat orgs$86k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +48% since the first grant, against +31% for those funded once.

15 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
3

Total granted

$1.1M
$45k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+48%
+31%

Still filing today

47%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 82% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $41k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesYouth DevelopmentHousing & ShelterReligionHealthPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NF
    New Futures Inc
    8× · 2017–2024 · $301k · revenue +105% · 29% of their budget
  • ES
    EIGHTH STREET COMMUNITY
    5× · 2019–2024 · $144k · revenue +76%
  • HF
    Habitat for Humanity of the River Valley
    3× · 2017–2021 · $35k · revenue +52%

Funded once

  • TR
    THE RILEY BEHAVIORAL AND EDUCATIONAL CENTERgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $20k · revenue +31%
  • HI
    HEALS INC
    one grant, 2017 · $15k · revenue +8%
  • NATIONS OF COACHES INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue +83%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Bridge of Hope Ministries Inc

Provide safe & loving home for children

Human Services
2
Born Again Ministries

To provide or connect low -income or ex-offenders affordable houses who wouldn't otherwise have the opportunity to have a bighter future

Health
3
Victory Family Services
Human Services
4
Holy Rock Outreach Ministeries Inc

The mission of Holy Rock Outreach Ministries, Inc. is to provide a comprehensive social services approach that will promote renewed hope and restoration to a families in crisis.

—
5
New Covenant Safe Haven

New Covenant Safe Haven is a Christian-based organization committed to uplifting and supporting individuals and families living in poverty within our community. Our primary mission is to provide essential services such as temporary shelter…

Human Services
6
Loaves & Fishes the Church Without Walls

Community outreach and church services

Religion
7
Hilo Ministries Inc

To be an organization where people are excited to assist in the love and care of the orphan and those in foster care, as well as providing temporary housing and training for those in the worldwide missionary field.

Human Services
8
Area in Need Missionary House Inc

Feeding and clothing the homeless In order to bring love and hope back to the communities one area at a time

Human Services
9
His House Inc
Religion
10
Marys House of Restoration

Marys house mission is to provide transitional living environment which provides residential care, individual and group counceling, assessment

—
11
Dale County Rescue Mission

The rescue missions purpose is to provide food, housing , and transportation in emergency situations to local residents and transients, Those served are spiritually ministered.

Human Services
12
Bryant Homes Inc

Transitional Living Services for ex-offe

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Fostering Connections; the most unlike its peers is Winshape Foundationinc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/14
Grantees still filing
9/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

New Futures Inc: $301,102 · Human ServicesNew Futures IncEIGHTH STREET COMMUNITY: $144,363 · Human ServicesEIGHTH STREET COMMUNITYINSIDE-OUT MINISTRIES INC: $50,000 · Human ServicesINSIDE-OUT MINISTRIES INCHAVEIHOPE INC: $20,000 · Human Services+2 more: $23,000 · Human ServicesHOUSE OF HARVEST: $91,000 · OtherHOUSE OF HARVESTASBURY CHURCH INC: $73,000 · OtherASBURY CHURCH INCLIMESTONE CORRECTIONAL CHAPEL BUILDING FUND: $50,000 · OtherLIMESTONE CORRECTIONAL CHAPEL BUI…ROYAL FAMILY KIDS CAMP: $40,000 · OtherROYAL FAMILY KIDS CAMPSOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL: $31,500 · OtherSOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAULWALL HIGHWAY BAPTIST CHURCH: $25,596 · OtherWALL HIGHWAY BAPTIST CHURCHTWO FISH INC: $15,000 · OtherWINSHAPE FOUNDATIONINC: $15,334 · OtherHEALS INC: $15,000 · OtherHUNTSVILLE DREAM CENTER INC: $140,000 · PhilanthropyHUNTSVILLE DR…FIRST PRIORITY OF NORTH ALABAMA INC: $67,000 · Youth DevelopmentNATIONS OF COACHES INC: $10,000 · Youth DevelopmentShepherds Fold Village Inc: $52,000 · Crime & LegalHabitat for Humanity of the River Valley: $35,000 · Housing & ShelterTHE RILEY BEHAVIORAL AND EDUCATIONAL CENTER: $20,000 · Education
Human Services$538,465Other$356,430Philanthropy$140,000Youth Development$77,000Crime & Legal$52,000Housing & Shelter$35,000Education$20,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNew Futures Inc: $301,102 over 8y, 29% of budgetEIGHTH STREET COMMUNITY: $144,363 over 5y, 4.3% of budgetHUNTSVILLE DREAM CENTER INC: $140,000 over 4y, 3.6% of budgetFIRST PRIORITY OF NORTH ALABAMA INC: $67,000 over 5y, 22% of budgetShepherds Fold Village Inc: $52,000 over 2y, 6.9% of budgetINSIDE-OUT MINISTRIES INC: $50,000 over 2y, 25% of budgetHabitat for Humanity of the River Valley: $35,000 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetTHE RILEY BEHAVIORAL AND EDUCATIONAL CENTER: $20,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetHAVEIHOPE INC: $20,000 over 1y, 39% of budgetFOSTERING CONNECTIONS: $17,000 over 2y, 6.0% of budgetWINSHAPE FOUNDATIONINC: $15,334 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHEALS INC: $15,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetNATIONS OF COACHES INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetSYLVIA COLLINS MINISTRIES: $6,000 over 1y, 2.7% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds New Futures Inc ↗
  • Who funds EIGHTH STREET COMMUNITY ↗
  • Who funds HUNTSVILLE DREAM CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds FIRST PRIORITY OF NORTH ALABAMA INC ↗
  • Who funds Shepherds Fold Village Inc ↗
  • Who funds INSIDE-OUT MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds Habitat for Humanity of the River Valley ↗
  • Who funds THE RILEY BEHAVIORAL AND EDUCATIONAL CENTER ↗
  • Who funds HAVEIHOPE INC ↗
  • Who funds FOSTERING CONNECTIONS ↗
  • Who funds WINSHAPE FOUNDATIONINC ↗
  • Who funds HEALS INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONS OF COACHES INC ↗
  • Who funds SYLVIA COLLINS MINISTRIES ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation …Alpha FoundationEnterprise Holdings F…Raymond James Charita…Morgan Stanley Global…Natl Christian Charit…American Online Givin…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Community Foundation of Greater HuntsvilleAL28× affinity11 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of Greater Huntsville · Alpha Foundation · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Asbury Thrift Store Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Asbury Thrift Store Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Asbury Thrift Store’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home