Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersMostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →
Plinth

· Public charity

Asante

ASANTE exists to provide quality healthcare services in a compassionate manner, valued by the communities we serve.

$103k
Granted FY2024still arriving
3
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$55k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.

Health$741kFood & Nutrition$274kHuman Services$270kEducation$236kCrime & Legal$95kRecreation & Sports$95kHousing & Shelter$50kCommunity Improvement$30kOther$0
02FY2024 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 3 grants below total $72,500 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $102,809 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $30,309 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $8k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $55k
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$2.2B
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JACKSON COUNTY SART$55,000
ROGUE VALLEY FAMILY YMCA$10,000
GHOST TREE INVITATIONAL$7,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $350k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%COMPASS HOUSE: $100k → 13%COMPASS HOUSE: $100k → 13%COMPASS HOUSE: $60k → 13%YMCA OF MEDFORD OREGON: $15k → 13%YMCA OF MEDFORD OREGON: $15k → 13%ROGUE VALLEY FAMILY YMCA: $10k → 13%YMCA OF MEDFORD OREGON: $10k → 13%OASIS CENTER OF THE ROGUE VALLEY: $25k → 13%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $15k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 26% of Asante’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 99% of the giving stays in OR; read by stated purpose it is 75% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

Asantelessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.5M · 12 repeat orgs$287k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +33% since the first grant, against +23% for the ones you funded once.

12 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2024, 10 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
13

Total granted

$1.5M
$279k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+33%
+23%

Still filing today

100%
69%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $8k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesRecreation & SportsEducationPhilanthropyYouth DevelopmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • A
    ACCESS
    6× · 2018–2023 · $159k · revenue +231%
  • JOSEPHINE COUNTY FOOD BANK
    6× · 2018–2023 · $110k · revenue +159%
  • ASANTE FOUNDATION
    4× · 2018–2023 · $105k · revenue +1%

Funded once

  • MP
    MASLOW PROJECT
    one grant, 2021 · $50k · revenue +19%
  • KH
    KID'S HEALTH CONNECTION
    one grant, 2017 · $50k
  • AC
    ASHLAND CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
    one grant, 2018 · $30k · revenue -4%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Oregon Medical Association

The mission of the oma is to speak as the unified voice of medicine in oregon; advocate for a sustainable, equitable, and accessible healthcare environment; and energize physicians and physician assistants by building and supporting their…

—
2
Oregon Restaurant and Lodging Association

Orla serves as the leading industry advocate, striving to protect, improve and promote oregon hospitality.

—
3
The Chamber of Medfordjackson County

To enhance and promote economic vitality and quality of life in southern oregon using business and community resources; fostering communication and collaboration on issues paramount to business success.

—
4
Eugene Area Chamber of Commerce

The mission of the eugene area chamber of commerce is to promote a healthy local economy by influencing business success, public policy, and community development.

—
5
Health Care for All Oregon

Hcao educates about and advocates for an equitable, affordable, comprehensive, high-quality publicly funded universal healthcare system that will improve the lives of individuals, families and communities across oregon and throughout the…

Health
6
Mid-Columbia Medical Center

Living God's love by inspiring health, wholeness, and hope.

Health
7
Oregon Primary Care Association

Leading the transformation of primary care to achieve health equity for all.

Health
8
Oregon Council for Behavioral Health

We provide a voice for an effective and accessible behavioral health system of care for Oregonians.

Community Improvement
9
Portland Adventist Medical Center

Living God's love by inspiring health, wholeness and hope.

Health
10
Northeast Oregon Network

Northeast Oregon Network (the Organization) is a non-profit organization established to create a healthier Oregon by reducing barriers for both residents and regional systems that support their health. The Organization fulfills its mission…

Health
11
North Olympic Healthcare Network

To provide patient-centered, quality-driven, whole-person healthcare services, accessible to everyone in our community.

Health
12
The Wallace Medical Concern

We partner with our community to make good health possible for all. wallace serves individuals and families who face barriers to care throughout the east multnomah county in the portland metropolitan area.

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Make-a-Wish Foundation of Oregon and the most unlike its peers is Medford Parks & Recreation Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 32 years old; the field is 17. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%0%<5yr14%5%5–10yr18%15%10–20yr20%35%20–35yr12%25%35–55yr14%20%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%2%5–10yr18%7%10–20yr20%65%20–35yr12%20%35–55yr14%7%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/25
the rest of the field
12%
808/6,478

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
22/22
Grantees still filing
14/22
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

JACKSON COUNTY SART — $372,300 · HealthJACKSON COUNTY SARTASANTE FOUNDATION — $104,625 · HealthASANTE FOUNDATIONGrants Pass Sobering Center Inc — $60,000 · HealthGrants Pass Sobering Center Inc+4 more — $41,750 · Health+4 moreCOMPASS HOUSE INC — $260,000 · Human ServicesCOMPASS HOUSE INCJOSEPHINE COUNTY FOOD BANK — $110,000 · Human ServicesJOSEPHINE COUNTY FOOD BANKYOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOC MEDFORD dba RV FAMILY YMCA — $50,000 · Human ServicesYOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOC M…OASIS CENTER OF THE ROGUE VALLEY — $25,000 · Human ServicesOASIS CENTER OF THE ROGUE VA…+1 more — $15,000 · Human ServicesACCESS — $158,700 · OtherACCESSLA CLINICA DEL VALLE FAMILY HEALTH CARE CENTER INC — $100,000 · OtherLA CLINICA DEL VALLE FAMI…KID'S HEALTH CONNECTION — $50,000 · OtherKID'S HEALTH CONNECTIONASHLAND CHAMBER OF COMMERCE — $30,000 · OtherASHLAND CHAMBER OF COMMER…KOBI — $26,250 · OtherKOBIHOLLY THEATRE — $22,500 · OtherHOLLY THEATRECHILDREN'S MIRACLE NETWORK — $19,674 · Other+1 more — $5,000 · OtherOREGON BUSINESS COUNCIL CHARITABLE INSTITUTE — $236,094 · EducationOREGON BUSINES…PEAR BLOSSOM FESTIVAL ASSOCIATION INC — $45,000 · Recreation & SportsMEDFORD PARKS & RECREATION FOUNDATION — $10,000 · Recreation & SportsMASLOW PROJECT — $50,000 · Youth DevelopmentUNITED WAY OF JACKSON COUNTY INC — $18,000 · PhilanthropyOregon Chapter American College of Cardiology — $6,000 · Community Improvement
Health$578,675Human Services$460,000Other$412,124Education$236,094Recreation & Sports$55,000Youth Development$50,000Philanthropy$18,000Community Improvement$6,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetJACKSON COUNTY SART — $372,300 over 8y, 8.8% of budgetCOMPASS HOUSE INC — $260,000 over 3y, 17% of budgetOREGON BUSINESS COUNCIL CHARITABLE INSTITUTE — $236,094 over 3y, 2.3% of budgetACCESS — $158,700 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetJOSEPHINE COUNTY FOOD BANK — $110,000 over 6y, 2.5% of budgetASANTE FOUNDATION — $104,625 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetLA CLINICA DEL VALLE FAMILY HEALTH CARE CENTER INC — $100,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetGrants Pass Sobering Center Inc — $60,000 over 4y, 7.6% of budgetMASLOW PROJECT — $50,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetYOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOC MEDFORD dba RV FAMILY YMCA — $50,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetPEAR BLOSSOM FESTIVAL ASSOCIATION INC — $45,000 over 3y, 24% of budgetASHLAND CHAMBER OF COMMERCE — $30,000 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetCHILDREN'S MIRACLE NETWORK — $19,674 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED WAY OF JACKSON COUNTY INC — $18,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetADDICTIONS RECOVERY CENTER INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGHOST TREE INVITATIONAL LTD — $7,500 over 1y, 6.7% of budgetOregon Chapter American College of Cardiology — $6,000 over 1y, 23% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Oregon Community …The Carpenter Foundat…The Ford Family Found…Carrico Family Founda…Providence Health & S…Careoregon IncJoe & Frances Naumes …The Collins FoundationMeyer Memorial TrustFirst Interstate Banc…Rogue Credit UnionWest Family Foundation
The Oregon Community FoundationOR27.8× affinity13 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Oregon Community Foundation · The Carpenter Foundation · The Ford Family Foundation · Carrico Family Foundation · Providence Health & Services - Oregon · Careoregon Inc · Joe & Frances Naumes Family Foundation · The Collins Foundation · Meyer Memorial Trust · First Interstate BancSystem Foundation Inc · Rogue Credit Union · West Family Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Asante funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 70%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 11%
  • Access — 65% of income from government
  • Grants Pass Sobering Center Inc — 31% of income from government
  • Maslow Project — 22% of income from government
  • Jackson County Sart — 14% of income from government
  • United Way of Jackson County Inc — 11% of income from government
  • Addictions Recovery Center Inc — 9% of income from government
  • La Clinica Del Valle Family Health Care Center Inc — 7% of income from government
  • Compass House Inc — 7% of income from government
  • Young Mens Christian Assoc Medford dba Rv Family Ymca — 1% of income from government
  • Josephine County Food Bank — 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
7get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 26 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home