· Private foundation
Aryc Family Foundation Inc
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k10 grants · $25k
- $10k–50k4 grants · $90k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| DALLAS CHINESE COMMUNITY CENTER | $43,000 |
| THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT DALLAS | $25,000 |
| ECLAT FOUNDATION | $11,500 |
| GREENHILL SCHOOL | $10,000 |
| UNITED OF LEARN | $5,000 |
| BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF GREATER DALLAS | $5,000 |
| PEROT MUSEUM OF NATURE AND SCIENCE | $5,000 |
| GENESIS WOMEN'S SHELTER & SUPPORT | $4,000 |
| DALLAS-FORT WORTH DOUBLE TENTH CELEBRATION COMMITTEE | $2,000 |
| THE STOREHOUSE COMMUNITY CENTER | $1,000 |
| HUA HSING CHINESE SCHOOL | $1,000 |
| BUDDHIST TZU CHI FOUNDATION | $1,000 |
| GLEE KIDS TROUPE | $500 |
| Individual grant recipient | $330 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY21–24, $4k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +43% since the first grant, against +25% for the ones you funded once.
11 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 58% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $49k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- EFECLAT FOUNDATION8× · 2017–2024 · $116k · revenue +174%
- GSGREENHILL SCHOOL2× · 2023–2024 · $20k · revenue +14%
- GIGIRLS INCORPORATED OF METROPOLITAN DALLAS2× · 2017–2018 · $4k · revenue +71%
Funded once
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2017 · $5k
- UOUNIVERSITY OF TEXAS IN ARLINGTONone grant, 2021 · $3k
- CCCROW COLLECTION OF ASIAN ARTone grant, 2017 · $1k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Chamber of commerce
Girls global academy public charter school (gga) was incorporated in the district of columbia in june 2019 and opened its doors in august 2020 fostering pathways to lead and learn. as an all-girls public charter high school, gga ignites…
Education of student with korean language, history, and culture to promote cultural understanding and diversity
As a christian university, we provide education and research opportunities preparing global leaders to partner with local communities.
Across the fields of performing arts, visual arts, education and outreach, business & policy, astc provides insight, generates ideas, and promotes collaboration to address present challenges and create a shared future. astc operates as a…
Greater Dallas Choral Society provides children and youth an experience in choral artistry in a group that reflects the diversity of the Dallas metroplex.
Dallas international school educates students of all backgrounds to contribute to a dynamic world with its internationally renowned curriculum, multiple language instruction, and exposure to diverse cultural views.
Since its founding in 1951, the mission of the world affairs council of dallas/fort worth has been to provide relevant information about global issues, challenges, and opportunities while establishing north texas as a center for…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Boys & Girls Clubs of Greater Dallas Inc and the most unlike its peers is Taiwanese Chambers of Commerce of North America. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 37 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds DALLAS CHINESE COMMUNITY CENTER ↗
- Who funds ECLAT FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds GREENHILL SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds GREATER DALLAS INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds UNITED TO LEARN ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF GREATER DALLAS INC ↗
- Who funds PEROT MUSEUM OF NATURE & SCIENCE ↗
- Who funds GENESIS WOMENS SHELTER & SUPPORT ↗
- Who funds GIRLS INCORPORATED OF METROPOLITAN DALLAS ↗
- Who funds INTERNATIONAL LEADERSHIP FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE STOREHOUSE COMMUNITY CENTER ↗
- Who funds DALLAS ASIAN AMERICAN YOUTH ORCHESTRA (DAAYO) ↗
- Who funds GRANT HALLIBURTON FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds TAIWANESE CHAMBERS OF COMMERCE OF NORTH AMERICA ↗
- Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
- Who funds GFT CHARITY INC ↗
- Who funds Texas Women's Foundation ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Texas Instruments Foundation · Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · The Addy Foundation · McKesson Foundation Inc · United Way Worldwide · The Ayco Charitable Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Aryc Family Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Aryc Family Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to Aryc Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.