Skip to content

· Private foundation

Arthur D Weekes Jr Charitable Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$122k
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Housing & Shelter$221kInternational$130kAnimals$124kEducation$32kHealth$26kCivil Rights$15kPublic Safety & Disaster$13kArts & Culture$7kOther$0
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k6 grants · $22k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $100k
$10,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$296k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Pine Street Inn Housing II Inc$20,000
Beaches Habitat for Humanity$20,000
MSPCA-Angell$20,000
American Civil Liberties Union Foundation Inc$15,000
Direct Relief$15,000
Amnesty International$10,000
World Central Kitchen$8,000
Groton School$5,000
Planned Parenthood League$5,000
Coco Point Fund$2,500
Society of the Cincinnati$1,000
ACORD Food Pantry$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–25, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%ACORD Food Pantry: $500 → 10%ACORD Food Pantry: $500 → 10%ACORD Food Pantry: $500 → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$555k · 12 repeat orgs$15k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +8% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

12 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
1

Total granted

$555k
$15k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+8%
0%

Still filing today

92%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $15k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalAnimalsHousing & ShelterEducationArts & CultureCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MASSACHUSETTS SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS
    7× · 2019–2025 · $119k · revenue +77%
  • DIRECT RELIEF
    4× · 2022–2025 · $55k · revenue +8%
  • AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL OF THE USA INC
    4× · 2022–2025 · $34k · revenue +1%

Funded once

  • AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2025 · $15k · revenue 0%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
American Flood Coalition Inc

To drive transformational adaptation to protect communities across the country from higher seas, stronger storms, and more frequent flooding.

Environment
2
Animal Care Sanctuary

Animal care sanctuary's lifesaving mission as a no kill organization envisions a community that promotes turning compassion into action for companion animals by: 1.) adopting healthy pet companions into loving homes. 2.) promoting the…

Animals
3
Ucsf Foundation Investment Company

The organization provides professional investment management services for endowed gifts and financial assets entrusted to the ucsf foundation.

Education
4
Accion International

Our mission is to create a fair and inclusive economy where underserved people have quality financial choices and opportunities to improve their economic well-being. we find and help build innovative companies with the potential to reach…

International
5
The Council of Insurance Agents and Brokers

The council was established to promote the interests of its members, who comprise leading insurance agencies and brokerage firms.

—
6
American Civil Liberties Union Fund of the District of Columbia

Preservation of civil liberties through litigation and public education.

—
7
Atlantic University Inc

Provide post-secondary education of excellence.

Education
8
National Association of Corporate Directors

We empower directors and transform boards to be future ready.

Public Benefit
9
Women's Humane Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Inc

As america's first animal shelter, founded in 1869, women's humane society dba women's animal center (wac), assists people in the community, saves the lives of animals, and improves the health of pets through its shelter and adoptions…

Animals
10
The Common Application Inc

The common application is a not-for-profit membership organization of over 1,100 colleges and universities across the globe committed to access, equity, and integrity in the college admission process. every year, over 1.5 million students…

Education
11
Connecticut Humane Society

The connecticut humane society is the leading resource in the state for companion animal welfare, enriching the lives of families and communities through adoption services, medical care, education, and prevention of cruelty.

Animals
12
Marin Humane Society

Marin humane transforms lives through exceptional animal care, humane education, and advocacy. every day, marin humane inspires compassion and positive relationships between people and animals.

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Amnesty International of the Usa Inc; the most unlike its peers is Coco Point Fund Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
7/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BEACHES HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC: $114,000 · Housing & ShelterBEACHES HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INCPINE STREET INN HOUSING II INC: $107,000 · Housing & ShelterPINE STREET INN HOUSING II INCMASSACHUSETTS SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $119,000 · AnimalsMASSACHUSETTS SOCIETY FO…DIXIE GIRL DOG RESCUE: $5,000 · AnimalsDIRECT RELIEF: $55,000 · InternationalDIRECT RELIEFAMNESTY INTERNATIONAL OF THE USA INC: $34,000 · InternationalAMNESTY INTERNATIONA…WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $13,000 · InternationalWORLD CENTRAL KITCHE…COCO POINT FUND INC: $41,000 · OtherCOCO POINT FU…Planned Parenthood League: $26,000 · OtherPlanned Paren…GROTON SCHOOL: $32,000 · EducationAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC: $15,000 · Civil RightsTHE SOCIETY OF THE CINCINNATI: $7,000 · Arts & CultureACORD INC: $1,500 · Human Services
Housing & Shelter$221,000Animals$124,000International$102,000Other$67,000Education$32,000Civil Rights$15,000Arts & Culture$7,000Human Services$1,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMASSACHUSETTS SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $119,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetBEACHES HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC: $114,000 over 7y, 1.1% of budgetPINE STREET INN HOUSING II INC: $107,000 over 7y, 17% of budgetDIRECT RELIEF: $55,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCOCO POINT FUND INC: $41,000 over 7y, 4.7% of budgetAMNESTY INTERNATIONAL OF THE USA INC: $34,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetGROTON SCHOOL: $32,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $13,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SOCIETY OF THE CINCINNATI: $7,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetDIXIE GIRL DOG RESCUE: $5,000 over 4y, 1.0% of budgetACORD INC: $1,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MASSACHUSETTS SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS ↗
  • Who funds BEACHES HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC ↗
  • Who funds PINE STREET INN HOUSING II INC ↗
  • Who funds DIRECT RELIEF ↗
  • Who funds COCO POINT FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL OF THE USA INC ↗
  • Who funds GROTON SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
  • Who funds THE SOCIETY OF THE CINCINNATI ↗
  • Who funds DIXIE GIRL DOG RESCUE ↗
  • Who funds ACORD INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Bank of America Charitable Foundation IncNC8.8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Arthur D Weekes Jr Charitable Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Arthur D Weekes Jr Charitable Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →median 10%
  • Acord Inc: 10% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Arthur D Weekes Jr’s filings →

More from the funding graph