Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Arthur & Constance Goodman Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$10k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$3k
Largest
01What you fund
01

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 63% of ARTHUR & CONSTANCE GOODMAN FAMILY FOUNDATION’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$2,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$173k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$3,180
ST CATHERINE UNIVERSITY$3,000
JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER ST PAUL$2,000
MINNESOTA JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER$1,000
SHOLOM FOUNDATION$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 95% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%EVOLVE ADOPTION AND FAMILY SERVICES: $100 → 6%SHOLOM FOUNDATION: $1k → 14%SHOLOM FOUNDATION: $1k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$128k · 16 repeat orgs$11k to everyone else

16 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2025, 12 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
20

Total granted

$128k
$11k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+6%
+20%

Still filing today

31%
30%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesAnimalsEducationHousing & ShelterPhilanthropyEnvironmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SC
    ST CATHERINE UNIVERSITY
    9× · 2017–2025 · $27k · revenue +6%
  • JP
    JEREMIAH PROGRAM
    6× · 2017–2022 · $9k · revenue +161%
  • IO
    INTERFAITH OUTREACH AND COMMUNITY PARTNERS
    5× · 2017–2021 · $8k · revenue +55%

Funded once

  • GC
    Gillette Children's Hospital Foundation
    one grant, 2021 · $2k · revenue -22%
  • AL
    ARTHUR LEONARD CANCER CLINIC
    one grant, 2019 · $2k
  • CH
    CRETIN-DERHAM HALL
    one grant, 2023 · $2k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Minnesota Council on Foundations

MCF is a vibrant philanthropic community connecting, strengthening and mobilizing the power of philanthropy to advance prosperity and equity.

2
Minnesota Business Partnership

The minnesota business partnership's mission is to maintain a high quality of life for all minnesotans by ensuring that the state's economy remains strong, globally competitive and its prospects for growth bright by working with elected…

3
Minnesota Medical Association

To be the leading voice of medicine to make minnesota the healthiest state and the best place to practice.

4
Minnesota Jewish Community Center Foundation

The minnesota jcc foundation's sole purpose is to support the minnesota jcc.

Human Services
5
Minneapolis Jewish Federation

Minneapolis jewish federation is a nonprofit organization that promotes a culture of philanthropy, leverages resources to meet local and global jewish needs, and facilitates community planning to ensure a thriving and secure future.

Philanthropy
6
Children's Health Care

We champion the health needs of children and families. we are committed to improving children's health by providing the highest-quality, family centered care, advanced through research and education.

Health
7
Minnesota Chamber of Commerce and Industry

The minnesota chamber of commerce proactively leads the business community statewide to: advance pro-business, responsible minnesota public policy that creates jobs and grows the econony; provde member services to address evolving business…

8
Catholic Charities North Dakota

Guided by our values, Catholic Charities North Dakota serves people in need and advocates for the common good of all.

9
Retrieve a Golden of Minnesota (Ragom) Inc

Retrieve a golden of the midwest (ragom) rescues, fosters, and rehomes golden retrievers and golden mixes that can no longer remain in their current environments. the organization ensures each dog receives necessary veterinary care and…

Animals
10
Jewish Family Service of St Paul

Inspired by jewish values, we help people from all backgrounds build on their strengths and meet life's challenges.

Human Services
11
Minnesota Council of Nonprofits Inc

The Minnesota Council of Nonprofits informs, promotes, connects and strengthens individual nonprofits and the nonprofit sector.

Philanthropy
12
Saint Paul & Minnesota Foundation

Purpose: we inspire, advocate and invest to advance community visions. continued on sch o

Philanthropy

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Interfaith Outreach and Community Partners and the most unlike its peers is St Catherine University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 38 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
7/13
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Individual grant recipient — $25,945 · OtherIndividual grant recipientSHALOM HOME — $12,000 · OtherSHALOM HOMEBENILDE ST MARGARETS HIGH SCHOOL — $10,000 · OtherBENILDE ST MARGARETS HIGH SCHOOLJEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER ST PAUL — $8,000 · OtherJEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER ST PAULINTERFAITH OUTREACH AND COMMUNITY PARTNERS — $7,500 · OtherINTERFAITH OUTREACH AND COMMUNITY PARTNERSPTATC CHILDRENS HOSPITAL — $6,000 · OtherPTATC CHILDRENS HOSPITALNATURE CONSERVANCY — $4,600 · OtherCHILDRENS FOUNDATION PINE TREE APPLE TENNIS CL — $4,000 · OtherCRETIN DURHAM HALL SCHOOL — $4,000 · OtherDING DARLING WILDLIFE SANCTUARY — $3,500 · Other+17 more — $13,950 · Other+17 moreST CATHERINE UNIVERSITY — $27,000 · EducationST CATHERINE UNIVER…THE UNITED JEWISH FUND AND COUNCIL ST PAUL JEWISH FEDERATION — $18,700 · PhilanthropyTHE UNITED JE…+1 more — $200 · PhilanthropyJEREMIAH PROGRAM — $8,500 · Housing & ShelterSHOLOM FOUNDATION — $2,000 · Human ServicesEVOLVE Adoption & Family Services — $100 · Human ServicesGillette Children's Hospital Foundation — $2,000 · Health+1 more — $50 · HealthAnimal Humane Society — $100 · AnimalsFRIENDS OF ANIMAL ADOPTIONS INC — $100 · AnimalsNEBRASKA GAME AND PARKS FOUNDATION — $100 · Environment
Other$99,495Education$27,000Philanthropy$18,900Housing & Shelter$8,500Human Services$2,100Health$2,050Animals$200Environment$100

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetST CATHERINE UNIVERSITY — $27,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetTHE UNITED JEWISH FUND AND COUNCIL ST PAUL JEWISH FEDERATION — $18,700 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetJEREMIAH PROGRAM — $8,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetINTERFAITH OUTREACH AND COMMUNITY PARTNERS — $7,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetGillette Children's Hospital Foundation — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMINNESOTA JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSHOLOM FOUNDATION — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetRADY CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION SAN DIEGO — $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEVOLVE Adoption & Family Services — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAnimal Humane Society — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEBRASKA GAME AND PARKS FOUNDATION — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF ANIMAL ADOPTIONS INC — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMAYO CLINIC — $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ST CATHERINE UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds THE UNITED JEWISH FUND AND COUNCIL ST PAUL JEWISH FEDERATION
  • Who funds JEREMIAH PROGRAM
  • Who funds INTERFAITH OUTREACH AND COMMUNITY PARTNERS
  • Who funds Gillette Children's Hospital Foundation
  • Who funds MINNESOTA JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER
  • Who funds SHOLOM FOUNDATION
  • Who funds RADY CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION SAN DIEGO
  • Who funds EVOLVE Adoption & Family Services
  • Who funds Animal Humane Society
  • Who funds NEBRASKA GAME AND PARKS FOUNDATION
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF ANIMAL ADOPTIONS INC
  • Who funds MAYO CLINIC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Saint Paul & Minnesota FoundationMN24.9× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Saint Paul & Minnesota Foundation · The Minneapolis Foundation · Baird Foundation Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Mightycause Charitable Foundation · Catholic Community Foundation of Minnesota · The Richard M Schulze Family Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Arthur & Constance Goodman Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Arthur & Constance Goodman Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Arthur & Constance Goodman Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 38 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph