Skip to content

· Private foundation

Arthur and Charlotte Zitrin Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$802k
Granted FY2024still arriving
92
Grants FY2024still arriving
11
States reached
$304k
Largest
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Crime & Legal$3.0MEducation$829kArts & Culture$461kPhilanthropy$381kInternational$330kCivil Rights$136kPublic Benefit$128kYouth Development$96kOther$0
02FY2024 · 92 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k87 grants · $113k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $20k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $92k
  • $250k+2 grants · $577k
$1,000
Median grant
11
States reached
$5.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PUBLIC JUSTICE FOUNDATION$303,726
BASF JUSTICE & DIVERSITY CENTER$273,500
VITAL VOICES GLOBAL PARTNERSHIP$91,500
CONSUMER WATCHDOG$10,000
CONSUMER REPORTS$10,000
ALONZO KING LINES BALLET$9,180
SF MUSEUM OF MODERN ART$5,550
CENTER FOR AUTO SAFETY$5,000
SF JAZZ$5,000
LEGAL ASSISTANCE FOR THE ELDERLY$5,000
J STREET ED FUND$2,500
WESTERN CENTER ON LAW & POVERTY$2,500
SAN FRANCISCO BALLET ASSOCIATION$2,500
BAY AREA LEGAL AID$2,500
UC BERKELEYPOLICY ADVOCACY CLINIC$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $240k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%ANNIECANNONS: $1k → 14%KEE CHA-E-NAR CORPORATION: $500 → 17%GRAFTON COUNTY SENIOR CITIZENS COUNCIL: $500 → 10%ANNIECANNONS INC: $1k → 14%GRAFTON COUNTY SENIOR CITIZENS COUNCIL INC: $250 → 10%ANNIECANNONS INC: $1k → 14%Grafton County Sr Citizens Council: $250 → 10%ANNIECANNONS: $1k → 14%ANNIECANNONS: $1k → 14%ANNIECANNONS: $1k → 14%GRAFTON COUNTY SENIOR CITIZENS COUNCIL: $250 → 10%JEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICE OF LONG BEACH: $2k → 14%ANNIE CANNONS INC: $1k → 10%COLEMAN ADVOCATES: $2k → 10%MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF GREATER BAY AREA: $1k → 10%COLEMAN ADVOCATES: $2k → 10%Annie Cannons Inc: $1k → 10%COLEMAN ADVOCATES: $1k → 10%NOT FOR SALE: $1k → 10%NOT FOR SALE: $1k → 10%LARKIN STREET YOUTH SVCS: $1k → 10%LARKIN STREET YOUTH SERVICES: $1k → 10%LARKIN STREET YOUTH SERVICES: $1k → 10%LARKIN STREET YOUTH SERVICES: $1k → 10%LARKIN STREET YOUTH SVCS: $1k → 10%LARKIN STREET YOUTH SERVICES: $1k → 10%LARKIN STREET YOUTH SERVICES: $1k → 10%Stepping Stone: $500 → 10%YOUNG WOMEN'S FREEDOM CENTER: $150k → 10%JEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN SERVICES: $2k → 10%JEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN SERVICES: $2k → 10%JEWISH FAMILY & CHILDREN SERVICES: $1k → 10%VENTURA VIE: $50k → 10%VENTURA VIE: $6k → 10%VENTURA VIE: $1k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NH
WA
IL
MI
NY
MA
NV
OH
PA
CT
CA
VA
MD
AZ
TN
DC
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

79%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$4.3M · 132 repeat orgs$1.1M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +37% since the first grant, against +32% for those funded once.

132 repeat relationships: 76 still active in FY2024, 56 since wound down; 15 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

132
92

Total granted

$4.3M
$1.1M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+37%
+32%

Still filing today

58%
35%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $13k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureHuman ServicesEducationCrime & LegalCivil RightsHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PJ
    PUBLIC JUSTICE FOUNDATION
    6× · 2018–2024 · $1.3M · revenue +84%
  • VITAL VOICES GLOBAL PARTNERSHIP INC
    6× · 2017–2024 · $320k · revenue +53%
  • Legal Aid at Work
    8× · 2017–2024 · $285k · revenue +128%

Funded once

  • U
    UNDOCUFUNDSF
    one grant, 2020 · $350k
  • AS
    ANTIOCH SCHOOLS EDUCATION FUND
    one grant, 2020 · $232k
  • YW
    YOUNG WOMEN'S FREEDOM CENTERgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $150k · revenue +149%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Jobs with Justice San Francisco

A long-term, strategic alliance of labor, community, faith-based, and student organizations working together to build greater economic power for workers and community members through employee rights at work and access to good jobs,…

Employment
2
Asian Law Caucus

The Asian Law Caucus's mission is to promote, advance, and represent the legal and civil rights of Asian American Pacific Islander (AAPI) communities, recognizing that social, economic, political and racial inequalities continue to exist…

Crime & Legal
3
The Union of Concerned Scientists Inc

The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.

International
4
Kqed Inc

See schedule okqed serves the people of northern california with a community-supported alternative to commercial media, providing the knowledge needed to make informed decisions; convening community dialogue; bringing the arts to everyone;…

Arts & Culture
5
Public Advocates Inc

For more than five decades, public advocates has challenged the systemic causes of poverty and racial discrimination by strengthening community voices in public policy and achieving tangible legal victories advancing education, housing,…

—
6
Sf Partnership

SF Partnership is an organization comprised of SF's leading employers dedicated to supporting an equitable, resilient, and vibrant economy shared by all people working and living in San Francisco. Through education, advocacy, and research,…

—
7
First Amendment Coalition

The first amendment coalition protects and promotes a free press, freedom of expression and the people's right to know. continued on schedule o.

—
8
San Francisco Public Press

The mission of the San Francisco Public Press is to enrich civic life by publishing investigative and solutions journalism that engages diverse audiences and promotes public accountability. The San Francisco Public Press…

Education
9
Immigration Institute of the Bay Area

The immigration institute of the bay area helps immigrants, refugees, and their families join and contribute to the community.

Arts & Culture
10
American Civil Liberties Union of Northern California

The american civil liberties union of northern california (aclu nc union) defends and advances the principles of freedom, equality and justice contained in the united states constitution. aclu nc union, a california mutual benefit…

—
11
The International School of San Francisco

Guided by the principles of academic rigor and diversity, the international school of san francisco offers programs of study in french and english to prepare its graduates for a world in which the ability to think critically and to…

Education
12
Alliance for Safety and Justice

Just safe's mission is to educate the public about the needs of communities most impacted by crime, violence, and incarceration; and promote new safety solutions through community-building, leadership development, grassroots mobilization,…

Crime & Legal
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Young Women's Freedom Center; the most unlike its peers is Foundation to Combat Anti-Semitism Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

121 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 121 of the 242 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
22
Early backer (in before they grew)
117/121
Grantees still filing
84/121
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BASF JUSTICE & DIVERSITY CENTER: $1,083,500 · OtherBASF JUSTICE & DIVERSITY CENTERUNDOCUFUNDSF: $350,000 · OtherUNDOCUFUNDSFANTIOCH SCHOOLS EDUCATION FUND: $232,000 · OtherANTIOCH SCHOOLS EDUCATION FUNDSF CONSERVATORY OF MUSIC: $167,500 · OtherSF CONSERVATORY OF MUSICIndividual grant recipient: $105,860 · Other+136 more: $849,359 · Other+136 morePUBLIC JUSTICE FOUNDATION: $1,299,356 · Crime & LegalPUBLIC JUSTICE FOUNDATIONLegal Aid at Work: $285,000 · Crime & LegalLegal Aid at Work+5 more: $48,530 · Crime & LegalTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $350,000 · EducationTHE BOARD …Oberlin College: $124,500 · EducationOberlin Co…GOLDEN GATE UNIVERSITY: $43,900 · EducationGOLDEN GAT…SAN FRANCISCO CONSERVATORY OF MUSIC: $25,000 · Education+5 more: $15,600 · EducationVITAL VOICES GLOBAL PARTNERSHIP INC: $319,500 · International+4 more: $10,400 · InternationalYOUNG WOMEN'S FREEDOM CENTER: $150,000 · Human ServicesVENTURA VIE: $57,739 · Human ServicesAnnieCannons Inc: $8,080 · Human Services+7 more: $23,250 · Human ServicesSAN FRANCISCO JAZZ ORGANIZATION: $43,459 · Arts & CultureSAN FRANCISCO MUSEUM OF MODERN ART: $19,160 · Arts & CultureALONZO KING LINES BALLET: $15,430 · Arts & CultureSAN FRANCISCO BALLET ASSOCIATION: $10,811 · Arts & CultureMETROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART: $8,500 · Arts & CultureCOMMUNITY MUSIC CENTER: $8,500 · Arts & CultureJewish Film Institute: $6,600 · Arts & CultureWOMEN MAKE MOVIES INC: $6,150 · Arts & CultureTHE EXPLORATORIUM: $6,087 · Arts & CultureTHE CONTEMPORARY JEWISH MUSEUM: $6,000 · Arts & Culture+12 more: $32,032 · Arts & CultureCONSUMER REPORTS INC: $76,000 · Public BenefitCONSUMER WATCHDOG: $19,000 · Public BenefitNATIONAL CONSUMERS LEAGUE INC: $10,000 · Public Benefit+3 more: $5,550 · Public Benefit
Other$2,788,219Crime & Legal$1,632,886Education$559,000International$329,900Human Services$239,069Arts & Culture$162,729Public Benefit$110,550

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPUBLIC JUSTICE FOUNDATION: $1,299,356 over 6y, 13% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $350,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetVITAL VOICES GLOBAL PARTNERSHIP INC: $319,500 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetLegal Aid at Work: $285,000 over 8y, 2.1% of budgetYOUNG WOMEN'S FREEDOM CENTER: $150,000 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetOberlin College: $124,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCONSUMER REPORTS INC: $76,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetEqual Justice Society: $59,000 over 8y, 2.3% of budgetVENTURA VIE: $57,739 over 3y, 50% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR AUTO SAFETY INC: $50,000 over 8y, 2.3% of budgetGOLDEN GATE UNIVERSITY: $43,900 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO JAZZ ORGANIZATION: $43,459 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO CONSERVATORY OF MUSIC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRenaissance Entrepreneurship Center: $20,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetENTERPRISE FOR YOUTH: $19,850 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO MUSEUM OF MODERN ART: $19,160 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetALLIANCE FOR JUSTICE: $19,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetCONSUMER WATCHDOG: $19,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetBAY AREA LEGAL AID: $16,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetBREAST CANCER ACTION: $16,000 over 8y, 0.5% of budgetALONZO KING LINES BALLET: $15,430 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetWestern Center on Law & Poverty Inc: $11,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetLegal Assistance to the Elderly: $11,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO BALLET ASSOCIATION: $10,811 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLEGAL ASSISTANCE FOR SENIORS: $10,500 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC: $10,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BAR ASSOCIATION OF SAN FRANCISCO: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL CONSUMERS LEAGUE INC: $10,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetEAST BAY COMMUNITY LAW CENTER: $9,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetMETROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART: $8,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY MUSIC CENTER: $8,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetAnnieCannons Inc: $8,080 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetEviction Defense Collaborative Inc: $8,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetTENDERLOIN HOUSING CLINIC INC: $7,950 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetAIDS LEGAL REFERRAL PANEL OF THE SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA: $7,824 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO FOOD BANK: $7,250 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetPROJECT AVARY INC ALTERNATIVE VENTURES FOR AT RISK YOUTH: $7,030 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetPATHWAYS FOR KIDS CO PETER DWARES: $7,000 over 7y, 1.1% of budgetLarkin Street Youth Services: $7,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetJewish Film Institute: $6,600 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetJ STREET EDUCATION FUND INC: $6,598 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWOMEN MAKE MOVIES INC: $6,150 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE EXPLORATORIUM: $6,087 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetLA RAZA CENTRO LEGAL - SAN FRANCISCO: $6,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetTHE CONTEMPORARY JEWISH MUSEUM: $6,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CONSTITUTION SOCIETY FOR LAW & POLICY: $5,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetThe Center for Investigative Reporting Inc: $5,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetColeman Children and Youth Services dba Coleman Advocates for Children & Youth: $5,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds PUBLIC JUSTICE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds VITAL VOICES GLOBAL PARTNERSHIP INC ↗
  • Who funds Legal Aid at Work ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG WOMEN'S FREEDOM CENTER ↗
  • Who funds Oberlin College ↗
  • Who funds CONSUMER REPORTS INC ↗
  • Who funds Equal Justice Society ↗
  • Who funds VENTURA VIE ↗
  • Who funds THE CENTER FOR AUTO SAFETY INC ↗
  • Who funds GOLDEN GATE UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds SAN FRANCISCO JAZZ ORGANIZATION ↗
  • Who funds SAN FRANCISCO CONSERVATORY OF MUSIC ↗
  • Who funds Renaissance Entrepreneurship Center ↗
  • Who funds ENTERPRISE FOR YOUTH ↗
  • Who funds SAN FRANCISCO MUSEUM OF MODERN ART ↗
  • Who funds ALLIANCE FOR JUSTICE ↗
  • Who funds CONSUMER WATCHDOG ↗
  • Who funds BAY AREA LEGAL AID ↗
  • Who funds BREAST CANCER ACTION ↗
  • Who funds ALONZO KING LINES BALLET ↗
  • Who funds Western Center on Law & Poverty Inc ↗
  • Who funds Legal Assistance to the Elderly ↗
  • Who funds SAN FRANCISCO BALLET ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds LEGAL ASSISTANCE FOR SENIORS ↗
  • Who funds NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The San Francisco FoundationCA64× affinity45 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The San Francisco Foundation · McNabb Foundation · Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & Sonoma · Marin Community Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · The James Irvine Foundation · United Way of the Bay Area · Bothin Foundation · Crankstart Foundation · Horizons Foundation · Tipping Point Community · The William & Flora Hewlett Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Arthur and Charlotte Zitrin Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Arthur and Charlotte Zitrin Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%4%15%34%60%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 3%
  • Hias Inc: 88% of income from government
  • Connecticut Public Broadcasting Inc: 3% of income from government
  • Jewish Family & Children's Service Inc: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
45report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 242 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Arthur and Charlotte Zitrin’s filings →

More from the funding graph