Skip to content
Art and Toya Kaplan Family Foundation at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Private foundation

Art and Toya Kaplan Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$40k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$47kHuman Services$37kEmployment$36kHealth$20kCrime & Legal$5kAnimals$5kCivil Rights$3kEducation$3kOther$0
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $10k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $30k
$10,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$339k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PODOLNY GROUP INC$10,000
CITIZEN CHURCH$10,000
FOR THE ONE FOUNDATION$10,000
WHOLE HEART MINISTRIES$7,000
CS LEWIS FOUNDATION$3,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–25, $33k) land where the poverty rate runs at 20%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%FOR THE ONE FOUNDATION: $12k → 21%UNDER HIS CONSTRUCTION: $1k → 14%FOR THE ONE FOUNDATION: $10k → 21%FOR THE ONE FOUNDATION: $8k → 21%CASA DE MARIPOSA: $2k → 14%ALONGSIDE MINISTRIES ALBUQUERQUE INC: $500 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 26% of Art and Toya Kaplan Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 63% of the giving stays in NM; by stated purpose, 42%.

Art and Toya Kaplan Family Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

64%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$101k · 5 repeat orgs$55k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +76% since the first grant, against +23% for those funded once.

5 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
16

Total granted

$101k
$52k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+76%
+23%

Still filing today

60%
75%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesReligionHealthAnimalsCivil RightsCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PG
    PODOLNY GROUP INC
    4× · 2020–2025 · $36k
  • FT
    FOR THE ONE FOUNDATION INC
    3× · 2022–2025 · $30k · revenue +188% · 72% of their budget
  • CC
    CITIZEN CHURCH
    4× · 2021–2025 · $21k

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2019 · $6k
  • HR
    HOY RECOVERY PROGRAM INC
    one grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue +21%
  • HM
    HEPWORTH MINISTRIES INC
    one grant, 2023 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Redeeming Love Ministries Inc
Health
2
Called to Love

We provide a retreat for foster and adoptive moms

Human Services
3
Washed Clean Addiction & Recovery Ministries

Residential Addiction Counseling

Health
4
New Beginnings Christian Care Inc

New Beginnings offers pregnancy testing, limited ultrasound referrals, helps women bring their babies to term and become responsible, loving mothers.

—
5
Hilo Ministries Inc

To be an organization where people are excited to assist in the love and care of the orphan and those in foster care, as well as providing temporary housing and training for those in the worldwide missionary field.

Human Services
6
Brookshire New Birth Ministries

To provide a transitional living faclity for battered women, women released from prison and women rehabing from drug addiction

Human Services
7
One Life Ministries
Religion
8
Life Training Ministries Inc

Christian counseling for individuals with anxiety depression or other emotional struggles. Christian counseling for marriages and other couples.

Human Services
9
Refuge for Prodigals International Bible Ministries Inc
Religion
10
Lifesource Ministries Inc

Christ-centered organization dedicated to empowering women with the truth and hope they need to choose life. develop and distribution of informational and educational materials.

Health
11
Lifecare Pregnancy Resources Inc

Sharing the gospel message and upholding the sanctity of human life by demonstrating the love of Christ to men and women facing unplanned pregnancies by providing spiritual, physical, and emotional support.

Human Services
12
Loving Arms - a Crisis Pregnancy Center

Sharing the love of christ while promoting sexual integrity and bringing life affirming services to those unprepared for pregnancy or hurt by abortion

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Care Net Pregnancy Center of Albuquerque Inc; the most unlike its peers is For the One Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
12/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

PODOLNY GROUP INC: $35,500 · OtherPODOLNY GROUP INCCITIZEN CHURCH: $20,500 · OtherCITIZEN CHURCHIndividual grant recipient: $5,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientHOY RECOVERY PROGRAM INC: $5,000 · OtherHOY RECOVERY PROGRAM INCHEPWORTH MINISTRIES INC: $5,000 · OtherHEPWORTH MINISTRIES INCCS Lewis Foundation: $3,000 · Other+2 more: $3,991 · OtherFOR THE ONE FOUNDATION INC: $29,701 · Human ServicesFOR THE ONE FOUNDATION …Casa de Mariposa: $1,500 · Human Services+2 more: $1,500 · Human ServicesWHOLE HEART MINISTRIES INC: $10,000 · ReligionWHOLE HEART …NEW MEXICO DREAM CENTER OF ALBUQUERQUE: $5,000 · ReligionNEW MEXICO D…MISSION DISPATCH: $2,500 · ReligionMISSION DISP…CARE NET PREGNANCY CENTER OF ALBUQUERQUE INC: $5,000 · HealthWings For LIFE International: $2,500 · HealthLOVING THUNDER THERAPEUTIC RIDING INC: $2,500 · HealthMASLENA RESCUE FOUNDATION: $5,000 · AnimalsFOR THE ONE INC: $5,000 · Public BenefitSHARETOGETHER ORG: $5,000 · Crime & LegalCare Net: $2,500 · Civil Rights
Other$78,491Human Services$32,701Religion$17,500Health$10,000Animals$5,000Public Benefit$5,000Crime & Legal$5,000Civil Rights$2,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFOR THE ONE FOUNDATION INC: $29,701 over 3y, 72% of budgetWHOLE HEART MINISTRIES INC: $10,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetHOY RECOVERY PROGRAM INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetMASLENA RESCUE FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 5.4% of budgetFOR THE ONE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 7.7% of budgetSHARETOGETHER ORG: $5,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetCARE NET PREGNANCY CENTER OF ALBUQUERQUE INC: $5,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetNEW MEXICO DREAM CENTER OF ALBUQUERQUE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetWings For LIFE International: $2,500 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetLOVING THUNDER THERAPEUTIC RIDING INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetMISSION DISPATCH: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCare Net: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCasa de Mariposa: $1,500 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetALONGSIDE MINISTRIES ALBUQUERQUE INC: $500 over 1y, 0.8% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Natl Christian Charit…American Online Givin…Fidelity Investments …Donor Advised Charita…Amazonsmile Foundation
Natl Christian Charitable Fdn IncGA12.1× affinity11 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Art and Toya Kaplan Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Art and Toya Kaplan Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Art and Toya Kaplan Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Art and Toya Kaplan Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Art and Toya Kaplan Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home