· Private foundation
Arnold & Lois Domer Foundation
Its FY2022 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2022.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2022
- Under $10k23 grants · $125k
- $10k–50k20 grants · $417k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $83k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| UW-Eau Claire Domer Scholarships | $83,116 |
| Individual grant recipient | $43,537 |
| Chippewa Valley Free Clinic | $39,580 |
| Feed My People Food Pantry | $36,941 |
| Community Table | $36,941 |
| Eau Claire County Humane Associatio | $29,025 |
| Catholic CharitiesSojourner House | $26,386 |
| Individual grant recipient | $21,109 |
| Trinity Lutheran Food Pantry | $21,109 |
| St Francis Food Pantry | $21,109 |
| Sacred Heart ChildAdolescent Behavi | $19,790 |
| Ruth House Holiday Meals | $15,832 |
| Hope Gospel Mission Holday Meals | $15,832 |
| Bolton Refuge House | $13,193 |
| Family Resource Center | $13,193 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–22, $243k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
45 repeat relationships — 42 still active in FY2022, 3 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2022, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $50k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CVCHIPPEWA VALLEY HEALTH CLINIC INC6× · 2017–2022 · $112k · revenue +127%
- TCTHE COMMUNITY TABLE INC6× · 2017–2022 · $105k · revenue +122%
- ECEAU CLAIRE COMMUNITY HUMANE ASSOCIATION INC6× · 2017–2022 · $84k · revenue +8%
Funded once
- CSCVTC Scholarhips for 2017-18one grant, 2017 · $17k
- LCLutheran Counseling Family Servicesone grant, 2018 · $1k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To promote a violence free atmosphere from domestic and sexual violence in which survivors can recognize their options to have the opportunity to continue living violence free and regain their sense of self-worth; to educate and raise…
Provides community outreach, advocacy, and shelter for victims of domestic violence.
Advocate for and support families who are homeless in our community by providing temporary housing and support services, and by fostering independence.
Promote safety, self-sufficiency, hope and healing to those effected by abuse.
The organization endeavors to provide safe emergency and transitional shelter and meals to homeless adults along with resource assistance to move clients beyond homelessness and toward independent living.
To provide safe shelter, advocacy, counseling, referrals and support to all victims of domestic violence and sexual assault.
Our mission is to empower those affected by domestic violence and sexual assault and address the root causes of abuse in the community through education and advocacy.
The chippewa county humane association seeks to relieve the suffering of homeless companion animals by setting an example of excellence in animal care and placement, humane education, and community leadership.
Our mission is to help low-income families and families experiencing homelessness achieve sustainable independence through a community-based response.
To alleviate hunger and promote self-sufficiency with dignity and compassion to low-income, elderly and disabled residents of Ozaukee County.
The organization's mission is to provide comprehensive services for family members experiencing family conflict and family violence, and to provide understanding and consultation for the community at large. the organization provides…
The center's mission is to advocate and support social change that will result in non-violent relationships, homes and communities through public education, direct services, a haven and programs related to the issues of domestic and sexual…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Chippewa Valley Health Clinic Inc and the most unlike its peers is Bobshouse 4Dogs Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 49 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds CHIPPEWA VALLEY HEALTH CLINIC INC ↗
- Who funds THE COMMUNITY TABLE INC ↗
- Who funds EAU CLAIRE COMMUNITY HUMANE ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds ST FRANCIS FOOD PANTRY INC ↗
- Who funds BOLTON REFUGE HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds BENJAMIN'S HOUSE EMERGENCY SHELTER INC ↗
- Who funds BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF GREEN COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds Bobshouse 4Dogs Inc ↗
- Who funds GIRLS ON THE RUN OF THE CHIPPEWA VALLEY INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Eau Claire Community Foundation · Xcel Energy Foundation · Pablo Foundation Inc · Green Bay Packers Foundation · The Jamf Nation Global Foundation · United Way of the Greater Chippewa Valley Inc · Otto Bremer Trust · Multhauf Foundation Ltd · Mayo Clinic Group Return · Baird Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Arnold & Lois Domer Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.