Skip to content
Arnall Family Foundation at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Private foundation

Arnall Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$832k
Granted FY2024still arriving
6
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$747k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Philanthropy$110MAnimals$8.4MCrime & Legal$5.4MEducation$3.9MHuman Services$2.7MArts & Culture$2.2MHealth$1.6MYouth Development$1.5MOther$0
02FY2024 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k3 grants · $9k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $13k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $63k
  • $250k+1 grant · $747k
$13,442
Median grant
1
States reached
$28M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Oklahoma County Diversion Hub$747,496
Oklahoma County Diversion Hub$62,758
Oklahoma County Diversion Hub$13,442
Oklahoma County Diversion Hub$4,350
Homeless Alliance$3,954
About Face Women's Program$249
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–23, $2.9M) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 99% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%The Care Center: $260k → 16%Connect our Kids: $20k → 4%The Care Center: $23k → 16%Child Welfare Innovation Inc: $100k → 16%Child Welfare Innovation Inc: $84k → 16%Sunbeam Family Services: $128k → 16%City Care Inc: $75k → 16%City Care Inc: $60k → 16%City Care Inc: $40k → 16%Sunbeam Family Services: $10k → 16%Sunbeam Family Services: $10k → 16%Sunbeam Family Services: $10k → 16%Sunbeam Family Services: $10k → 16%Sunbeam Family Services: $1k → 16%Hope for the Future Inc: $139k → 16%YWCA OKC: $77k → 16%Hope for the Future Inc: $72k → 16%Hope for the Future Inc: $53k → 16%Citizens for Children and Families: $30k → 16%Citizens for Children and Families: $30k → 16%YWCA OKC: $20k → 16%Citizens for Children and Families: $14k → 16%City Care Inc: $300k → 16%Angels Foster Family Network: $10k → 16%YWCA OKC: $10k → 16%Angel S Foster Family Network: $10k → 16%Angels Foster Family Network: $10k → 16%Divine Wisdom Task Inc: $35k → 16%The Care Center: $10k → 16%Outrageous Love: $5k → 16%Pivot Inc: $616k → 16%Pivot Inc: $320k → 16%Pivot Inc: $124k → 16%Pivot Inc: $67k → 16%Urban League of Greater OKC: $18k → 16%Urban League of Greater OKC: $17k → 16%Shine Foundation: $50k → 16%Urban League of Greater OKC: $15k → 16%Fostering Sweet Dreams Foundation: $10k → 16%Pivot Inc: $5k → 16%Urban League of Greater OKC: $5k → 16%Urban League of Greater OKC: $3k → 16%Shine Foundation: $750 → 16%Oklahoma Foundation for the Disable: $5k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
MA
PA
CA
CO
NE
KY
WV
VA
MD
AZ
SC
DC
OK
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 30% of Arnall Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 95% of the giving stays in OK; by stated purpose, 80%.

Arnall Family Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 14% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

62%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$19M · 67 repeat orgs$12M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +54% since the first grant, against +36% for those funded once.

67 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2024, 65 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

67
84

Total granted

$19M
$12M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+54%
+36%

Still filing today

73%
42%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $249 went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesAnimalsHealthEducationArts & CultureCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • OC
    OKLAHOMA COUNTY DIVERSION HUB INC
    5× · 2019–2024 · $4.0M · revenue ×71 · 100% of their budget
  • TA
    THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS
    2× · 2019–2020 · $1.6M · revenue +60%
  • KH
    KENTUCKY HUMANE SOCIETY - ANIMAL RESCUE
    3× · 2019–2021 · $1.2M · revenue +56%

Funded once

  • UT
    Univ Tulsa College of Law
    one grant, 2020 · $3.0M
  • OKLAHOMA CONTEMPORARY ARTS CENTER INC
    one grant, 2020 · $2.0M · revenue -44%
  • OKC METRO ALLIANCE INC
    one grant, 2019 · $607k · revenue +16%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Oklahoma Newspaper Foundation
Arts & Culture
2
Oklahoma Paws Memphis Street Animal Rescue

To assist in the ongoing battle of pet overpopulation in Oklahoma by offering a no kill shelter environment, responsible adoption, medical aid, and community outreach. We also intend to provide sanctuary to companion animals who's people…

Animals
3
Diversity Center of Oklahoma Inc
Health
4
PAUSE4PAWS Inc

Pause4Paws promotes access to healthcare for pet owners in the Tulsa, Oklahoma, metro area impacted by homelessness, mental illness, or addiction who need inpatient treatment but have no one to care for their pets.

Health
5
Livefree Okc Inc

Dramatically reduce gun violence in impacted Oklahoma communities through intervention and effective provision of resources.

Human Services
6
Family Hope House Inc

Family Hope House empowers families through therapy, education, and advocacy. As Oklahoma's sole adoption competent mental health agency, we support foster and adoptive children for lasting stability and success.

Health
7
Tulsa Advocates for the Protection of Children

To improve the lives of children and youth in oklahoma's child welfare system by providing resources and building community.

Crime & Legal
8
Oklahoma Coalition for Affordable Housing Inc

The organization is an advocacy and member organization that helps lead the movement to ensure that all residents in oklahoma flourish in safe, afordable homes and the helps communities develope safe and afordable housing options.

Community Improvement
9
Family Crisis Center Inc

The family crisis center provides intervention and advocacy for victims of sexual assault and domestic violence. this is done with counselors, court advocates and 24 hour shelter for victims and their children.

Human Services
10
Missing and Murdered Indigenous People Central Oklahoma Chapter
Civil Rights
11
Oklahoma City Housing Services Redevelopment Corporation

To revitalize urban oklahoma city neighborhoods and create affordable housing opportunities by rehabilitating historic homes, constructing new homes, and increasing community investment through home ownership.

Housing & Shelter
12
Legal Aid Services of Oklahoma Inc

To be a partner in the community making equal justice for all a reality.

Crime & Legal
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Oklahoma City Community Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Thomas N Lynn Institute for Healthcare Research Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

90 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 90 of the 155 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

14
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
33
Early backer (in before they grew)
87/90
Grantees still filing
64/90
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

OKLAHOMA CITY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $110,295,661 · PhilanthropyOKLAHOMA CITY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC+1 more: $125,000 · PhilanthropyUniv Tulsa College of Law: $3,000,000 · OtherUniv Tulsa…University of PA Trustees: $671,255 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $530,336 · OtherTEEMThe Education Employment MInist: $500,000 · OtherTEEM Education and Employment Minis: $463,000 · OtherTHE FREEDOM CENTER OF OKC LLC: $425,000 · OtherCommunity Transportation Association of America: $635,624 · OtherTHE EDUCATION AND EMPLOYMENT MINISTRY INC: $430,552 · Other+86 more: $6,066,146 · Other+86 moreTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $1,560,472 · AnimalsKENTUCKY HUMANE SOCIETY - ANIMAL RESCUE: $1,241,057 · AnimalsOKLAHOMA HUMANE SOCIETY: $614,400 · AnimalsHumane World for Animals Inc: $486,450 · AnimalsCHARLESTON ANIMAL SOCIETY: $484,440 · AnimalsDENVER DUMB FRIENDS LEAGUE: $389,820 · AnimalsDAYS END FARM HORSE RESCUE INC: $380,588 · AnimalsTulsa SPCA: $353,032 · AnimalsHEART OF PHOENIX EQUINE RESCUE INC: $275,015 · AnimalsTHE HUMANE SOCIETY OF TULSA: $229,423 · Animals+6 more: $499,721 · AnimalsOKLAHOMA COUNTY DIVERSION HUB INC: $4,022,588 · Crime & Legal+5 more: $255,867 · Crime & LegalPIVOT INC: $1,131,682 · Human ServicesCITY CARE INC: $475,250 · Human ServicesCare Center-Child Abuse Response and Evaluation Inc DBA The CARE Center: $292,500 · Human ServicesHope For The Future Inc: $263,075 · Human ServicesChild Welfare Innovation Inc: $183,600 · Human ServicesSUNBEAM FAMILY SERVICES INC: $169,227 · Human ServicesYOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF OKLAHOMA CI: $107,000 · Human Services+11 more: $368,639 · Human ServicesOKLAHOMA CONTEMPORARY ARTS CENTER INC: $2,000,000 · Arts & Culture+6 more: $84,500 · Arts & CultureOklahoma Halfway House Inc: $650,015 · HealthOKC METRO ALLIANCE INC: $607,110 · HealthSTIGLER HEALTH & WELLNESS CENTER INC: $182,297 · HealthThomas N Lynn Institute for Healthcare Research Inc: $127,520 · HealthHEARTLINE INC: $125,863 · HealthAUTISMOKLAHOMAORG INC: $122,515 · Health+6 more: $81,000 · Health
Philanthropy$110,420,661Other$12,721,913Animals$6,514,418Crime & Legal$4,278,455Human Services$2,990,973Arts & Culture$2,084,500Health$1,896,320

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetOKLAHOMA CITY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $110,295,661 over 5y, 53% of budgetOKLAHOMA COUNTY DIVERSION HUB INC: $4,022,588 over 5y, 100% of budgetOKLAHOMA CONTEMPORARY ARTS CENTER INC: $2,000,000 over 1y, 22% of budgetTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $1,560,472 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetKENTUCKY HUMANE SOCIETY - ANIMAL RESCUE: $1,241,057 over 3y, 5.6% of budgetPIVOT INC: $1,131,682 over 5y, 13% of budgetOklahoma Halfway House Inc: $650,015 over 2y, 69% of budgetCommunity Transportation Association of America: $635,624 over 4y, 4.1% of budgetOKLAHOMA HUMANE SOCIETY: $614,400 over 3y, 6.9% of budgetOKC METRO ALLIANCE INC: $607,110 over 1y, 14% of budgetHumane World for Animals Inc: $486,450 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCHARLESTON ANIMAL SOCIETY: $484,440 over 2y, 3.0% of budgetCITY CARE INC: $475,250 over 3y, 11% of budgetTHE EDUCATION AND EMPLOYMENT MINISTRY INC: $430,552 over 2y, 16% of budgetTHE FREEDOM CENTER OF OKC LLC: $425,000 over 2y, 42% of budgetDENVER DUMB FRIENDS LEAGUE: $389,820 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetDAYS END FARM HORSE RESCUE INC: $380,588 over 3y, 11% of budgetTHE HOMELESS ALLIANCE INC: $355,688 over 5y, 1.8% of budgetTulsa SPCA: $353,032 over 1y, 21% of budgetCOMMUNITY YOUTH SERVICES OF SOUTHERN OKLAHOMA: $350,000 over 1y, 11% of budget3 GIRLS ANIMAL RESCUE INC: $347,961 over 3y, 40% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF DENVER: $300,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCare Center-Child Abuse Response and Evaluation Inc DBA The CARE Center: $292,500 over 3y, 11% of budgetHEART OF PHOENIX EQUINE RESCUE INC: $275,015 over 2y, 40% of budgetThe Fund for Animals Inc: $275,012 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetHope For The Future Inc: $263,075 over 3y, 61% of budgetFIELDS & FUTURES FOUNDATION: $250,000 over 1y, 8.0% of budgetTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $217,054 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEXUS EQUINE INC: $184,877 over 3y, 6.7% of budgetChild Welfare Innovation Inc: $183,600 over 2y, 2.6% of budgetSTIGLER HEALTH & WELLNESS CENTER INC: $182,297 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetSUNBEAM FAMILY SERVICES INC: $169,227 over 5y, 1.0% of budgetThomas N Lynn Institute for Healthcare Research Inc: $127,520 over 2y, 27% of budgetHEARTLINE INC: $125,863 over 4y, 3.2% of budgetTULSA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $125,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAUTISMOKLAHOMAORG INC: $122,515 over 1y, 32% of budgetCASA OF OKLAHOMA COUNTY INC: $115,000 over 3y, 5.8% of budgetYOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF OKLAHOMA CI: $107,000 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetOKLAHOMA POLICY INC: $105,750 over 3y, 3.6% of budgetCut it Forward Inc: $101,500 over 3y, 48% of budgetOKLAHOMA CENTER FOR NONPROFITS INC: $100,700 over 4y, 1.4% of budgetNEW VOCATIONS RACEHORSE ADOPTION: $100,031 over 2y, 2.0% of budgetHorses Without Humans Rescue Organization: $100,000 over 1y, 29% of budgetSISU YOUTH INC: $78,813 over 1y, 4.9% of budgetCITIZENS FOR CHILDREN & FAMILIES INC: $74,376 over 2y, 31% of budgetGirl Scouts Western Oklahoma Inc: $72,015 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetURBAN LEAGUE OF GREATER OKLAHOMA CITY INC: $57,700 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetFREEDOM CITY INC: $45,000 over 2y, 9.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Oklahoma City Communi…Inasmuch FoundationCommunities Foundatio…El and Thelma Gaylord…Harris Foundation IncKirkpatrick Family Af…Sarkeys FoundationAmerican Fidelity Fou…The Anne and Henry Za…Love Meyer Family Fou…The Merrick FoundationCresap Family Foundat…
Oklahoma City Community Foundation IncOK82.6× affinity43 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Oklahoma City Community Foundation Inc · Inasmuch Foundation · Communities Foundation of Oklahoma · El and Thelma Gaylord Foundation · Harris Foundation Inc · Kirkpatrick Family Affiliated Fund of Occf Inc · Sarkeys Foundation · American Fidelity Foundation · The Anne and Henry Zarrow Foundation · Love Meyer Family Foundation · The Merrick Foundation · Cresap Family Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Arnall Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Arnall Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 310%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 21%
  • Sunbeam Family Services Inc: 52% of income from government
  • Oklahoma County Diversion Hub Inc: 51% of income from government
  • Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation: 31% of income from government
  • It's My Community Initiative Inc: 23% of income from government
  • Stigler Health & Wellness Center Inc: 21% of income from government
  • Tulsa Community Foundation: 11% of income from government
  • Reach Out and Read Inc: 9% of income from government
  • Mental Health Association in Tulsa Inc dba Mental Health Association Oklahoma: 8% of income from government
  • Pivot Inc: 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
31get no government money at all
31report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
2rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Arnall Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Arnall Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 155 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Arnall Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home