Skip to content

· Public charity

Arkansas Right to Life Inc Ed Fund

To educate the public about abortion and adoption alternatives

$148k
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$12k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$679kHuman Services$462kReligion$51kCommunity Improvement$10k
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$12,373
Median grant
1
States reached
$261k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
OPTIONS PREGNANCY CENTER$12,373
HEART TO HEART PREGNANCY SUPP CTR$12,373
NEW BEGINNINGS PREGNANCY HELP CTR$12,373
HOPE PLACE FORDYCE$12,373
CHOICES PREGNANCY SERVICES$12,373
CARING HEARTS PREGNANCY CTR$12,373
HOPE PLACE NEWPORT$12,373
HANNAH PREGNANCY RESOURCE CENTER$12,373
HOPE PLACE BERRYVILLE$12,373
CONNECTED ADOPTION ABCH&F$12,373
CHOICES PREGNANCY RESOURCE CLINIC$12,373
PREGNANCY RESOURCE CENTER$12,373
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $222k) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 15%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 15%NEW BEGINNINGS PREGNANCY HELP CTR: $12k → 20%PREGNANCY RESOURCE CENTER: $12k → 20%PATHWAY RESOURCE CENTER: $11k → 23%NEW BEGINNINGS PREGNANCY HELP CTR: $12k → 20%PREGNANCY RESOURCE CENTER: $12k → 20%NEW BEGINNINGS PREGNANCY HELP CTR: $11k → 20%PREGNANCY RESOURCE CENTER: $11k → 20%NEW BEGINNINGS PREGNANCY HELP CTR: $11k → 20%PREGNANCY RESOURCE CENTER: $11k → 20%NEW BEGINNINGS PREGNANCY HELP CTR: $11k → 20%PREGNANCY RESOURCE CENTER: $11k → 20%NEW BEGINNINGS PREGNANCY HELP CTR: $11k → 20%PREGNANCY RESOURCE CENTER: $10k → 20%NEW BEGINNINGS PREGNANCY HELP CTR: $10k → 20%PREGNANCY RESOURCE CTR FOR SW AR: $10k → 20%NEW BEGINNINGS PREGNANCY HELP CTR: $10k → 20%CONNECTED ADOPTION ABCH&F: $12k → 17%AR BAPTIST CHILDRENS HOME: $12k → 17%AR BAPTIST CHILDRENS HOME: $11k → 17%AR BAPTIST CHILDRENS HOME: $11k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.1M · 19 repeat orgs$54k to everyone else

19 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
4

Total granted

$1.1M
$42k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+82%
+193%

Still filing today

63%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $12k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthEducationCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NB
    NEW BEGINNINGS PREGNANCY HELP CENTER
    9× · 2017–2025 · $88k · revenue +111%
  • CC
    Cabot Crisis Pregnancy Center
    9× · 2017–2025 · $86k · revenue +62%
  • SA
    SOUTH ARKANSAS CARING PREGNANCY CENTER
    8× · 2018–2025 · $77k · revenue +180%

Funded once

  • SJ
    ST JOSEPH'S HELPERS OF PULASKI COUNTY
    one grant, 2017 · $11k · revenue +16%
  • AC
    AGAPE CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $11k · revenue +197%
  • PR
    Pathway Resource Centergraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $11k · revenue +82%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
South Texas Pregnancy Care Center

Crisis pregnancy counseling.

Health
2
Crisis Pregnancy Center Inc
—
3
Birth Choice Inc

Crisis pregnancy councelling

Health
4
A Woman's Choice

Pregnancy center dedicated to protecting the sanctity of human life.

—
5
Life Choices Pregnancy Care Center Inc

The center provides free pregnancy tests, limited o.b. ultrasounds, non- professional peer counseling, free literature & brochures on topics related to pregnancy and spiritual issues, emergency support for clients in the form of maternity…

Health
6
Crisis Pregnancy Center

Develop and administer programs designed to assist women in confronting and dealing with the spiritual, physical, emotional, economic and social problems associated with pregnancy.

Health
7
Center for Pregnancy Choices

Free pregnancy medical clinic with the purpose of helping families through education, medical services, peer counseling, and material support to be fully educated and equipped to carry to term and/or parent if they so choose.

Health
8
Center for Pregnancy Choices of Simpson County Inc

Provide resources, counseling, and support for mother-to-be.

Human Services
9
Northwest Arkansas Women's Resources

Loving choices pregnancy centers of nwa is here to provide outstanding counseling and limited medical services to our clients as they might be facing a crisis in their reproductive health, such as an unplanned pregnancy or a sexually…

—
10
Pregnancy Resource Center Inc

Faith Based Pregnancy Services

Health
11
Center for Pregnancy Choices

Services to troubled pregnant mothers

Human Services
12
Crisis Pregnancy Services Inc
Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Choices Pregnancy Resource Clinic; the most unlike its peers is Compassion Ministries Ltd. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
10
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
14/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HEART TO HEART PREGNANCY SUPPORT CENTER INC: $77,068 · OtherHEART TO HEART PREGNANCY SUPPORT CENTER INC1st Choice Pregnancy Resource Center Inc: $75,557 · Other1st Choice Pregnancy Resource Center IncHOPE PLACE NEWPORT: $67,381 · OtherHOPE PLACE NEWPORTHOPE PLACE FORDYCE: $67,381 · OtherHOPE PLACE FORDYCECRISIS PREGNANCY CENTER OF CENTRAL ARKANSAS: $55,964 · OtherCRISIS PREGNANCY CENTER OF CENTRAL ARKANSASDIOCESE OF LITTLE ROCK: $53,762 · OtherDIOCESE OF LITTLE ROCKThe Alpha Center Inc: $44,452 · OtherThe Alpha Center IncHOPEPLACE WARREN: $41,653 · OtherHOPEPLACE WARRENBETHANY CHRISTIAN SERVICES: $30,791 · OtherHOPE PLACE MONTICELLO: $30,529 · OtherLIFEHOUSE MINISTRIES INC: $20,549 · Other+3 more: $34,097 · Other+3 moreCabot Crisis Pregnancy Center: $85,575 · HealthCabot Crisis Pregnancy Cen…SOUTH ARKANSAS CARING PREGNANCY CENTER: $77,068 · HealthSOUTH ARKANSAS CARING PREG…INFORMED CHOICES WOMEN'S CENTER OF THE OZARKS INC: $75,557 · HealthINFORMED CHOICES WOMEN'S C…CHOICES PREGNANCY RESOURCE CLINIC: $45,030 · HealthCHOICES PREGNANCY RESOURCE…NEW BEGINNINGS PREGNANCY HELP CENTER: $87,930 · Human ServicesNEW BEGINNINGS PREGN…PREGNANCY RESOURCE CENTER FOR SOUTHWEST ARKANSAS: $77,068 · Human ServicesPREGNANCY RESOURCE C…ARKANSAS BAPTIST CHILDREN'S HOME & FAMILY MINISTRIES: $46,277 · Human ServicesARKANSAS BAPTIST CHI…Pathway Resource Center: $10,556 · Human ServicesNEW BEGINNINGS PREGNANCY SERVICES INC: $87,930 · EducationCOMPASSION MINISTRIES LTD: $9,687 · Community Improvement
Other$599,184Health$283,230Human Services$221,831Education$87,930Community Improvement$9,687

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNEW BEGINNINGS PREGNANCY SERVICES INC: $87,930 over 9y, 5.2% of budgetNEW BEGINNINGS PREGNANCY HELP CENTER: $87,930 over 9y, 3.9% of budgetCabot Crisis Pregnancy Center: $85,575 over 9y, 3.0% of budgetSOUTH ARKANSAS CARING PREGNANCY CENTER: $77,068 over 8y, 8.7% of budgetHEART TO HEART PREGNANCY SUPPORT CENTER INC: $77,068 over 7y, 6.0% of budgetPREGNANCY RESOURCE CENTER FOR SOUTHWEST ARKANSAS: $77,068 over 7y, 12% of budget1st Choice Pregnancy Resource Center Inc: $75,557 over 8y, 3.9% of budgetINFORMED CHOICES WOMEN'S CENTER OF THE OZARKS INC: $75,557 over 8y, 3.9% of budgetCRISIS PREGNANCY CENTER OF CENTRAL ARKANSAS: $55,964 over 6y, 4.0% of budgetARKANSAS BAPTIST CHILDREN'S HOME & FAMILY MINISTRIES: $46,277 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetCHOICES PREGNANCY RESOURCE CLINIC: $45,030 over 4y, 5.1% of budgetThe Alpha Center Inc: $44,452 over 5y, 11% of budgetST JOSEPH'S HELPERS OF PULASKI COUNTY: $10,862 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetAGAPE CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES INC: $10,862 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetPathway Resource Center: $10,556 over 1y, 8.8% of budgetCOMPASSION MINISTRIES LTD: $9,687 over 2y, 4.8% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NEW BEGINNINGS PREGNANCY SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds NEW BEGINNINGS PREGNANCY HELP CENTER ↗
  • Who funds Cabot Crisis Pregnancy Center ↗
  • Who funds SOUTH ARKANSAS CARING PREGNANCY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds HEART TO HEART PREGNANCY SUPPORT CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds PREGNANCY RESOURCE CENTER FOR SOUTHWEST ARKANSAS ↗
  • Who funds 1st Choice Pregnancy Resource Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds INFORMED CHOICES WOMEN'S CENTER OF THE OZARKS INC ↗
  • Who funds CRISIS PREGNANCY CENTER OF CENTRAL ARKANSAS ↗
  • Who funds ARKANSAS BAPTIST CHILDREN'S HOME & FAMILY MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds CHOICES PREGNANCY RESOURCE CLINIC ↗
  • Who funds The Alpha Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds ST JOSEPH'S HELPERS OF PULASKI COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds AGAPE CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds Pathway Resource Center ↗
  • Who funds COMPASSION MINISTRIES LTD ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Knights of Columbus Charities IncCT15.1× affinity5 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Knights of Columbus Charities Inc · Arkansas Community Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Arkansas Right to Life Inc Ed Fund funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Arkansas Right to Life Inc Ed Fund. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–24
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Arkansas Right to Life Inc Ed Fund?

    Find your warmest path to Arkansas Right to Life Inc Ed Fund through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Arkansas Right to Life Inc Ed’s filings →

    More from the funding graph