· Public charity
Arkansas Right to Life Inc Ed Fund
To educate the public about abortion and adoption alternatives
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| HEART TO HEART PREGNANCY SUPP CTR | $12,373 |
| NEW BEGINNINGS PREGNANCY HELP CTR | $12,373 |
| HOPE PLACE BERRYVILLE | $12,373 |
| CHOICES PREGNANCY RESOURCE CLINIC | $12,373 |
| HOPE PLACE NEWPORT | $12,373 |
| OPTIONS PREGNANCY CENTER | $12,373 |
| CHOICES PREGNANCY SERVICES | $12,373 |
| HOPE PLACE FORDYCE | $12,373 |
| CARING HEARTS PREGNANCY CTR | $12,373 |
| HANNAH PREGNANCY RESOURCE CENTER | $12,373 |
| PREGNANCY RESOURCE CENTER | $12,373 |
| CONNECTED ADOPTION ABCH&F | $12,373 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $222k) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 15%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
19 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $12k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- NBNEW BEGINNINGS PREGNANCY HELP CENTER9× · 2017–2025 · $88k · revenue +91%
- CCCabot Crisis Pregnancy Center9× · 2017–2025 · $86k · revenue +62%
- PRPREGNANCY RESOURCE CENTER FOR SOUTHWEST ARKANSAS7× · 2018–2025 · $77k · revenue +82%
Funded once
- SJST JOSEPH'S HELPERS OF PULASKI COUNTYone grant, 2017 · $11k · revenue +16%
- ACAGAPE CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES INCgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $11k · revenue +127%
- PRPathway Resource Centergraduatedone grant, 2023 · $11k · revenue +82%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Crisis pregnancy counseling.
Crisis pregnancy councelling
Pregnancy center dedicated to protecting the sanctity of human life.
The center provides free pregnancy tests, limited o.b. ultrasounds, non- professional peer counseling, free literature & brochures on topics related to pregnancy and spiritual issues, emergency support for clients in the form of maternity…
Develop and administer programs designed to assist women in confronting and dealing with the spiritual, physical, emotional, economic and social problems associated with pregnancy.
Free pregnancy medical clinic with the purpose of helping families through education, medical services, peer counseling, and material support to be fully educated and equipped to carry to term and/or parent if they so choose.
Provide resources, counseling, and support for mother-to-be.
Loving choices pregnancy centers of nwa is here to provide outstanding counseling and limited medical services to our clients as they might be facing a crisis in their reproductive health, such as an unplanned pregnancy or a sexually…
Faith Based Pregnancy Services
Services to troubled pregnant mothers
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Choices Pregnancy Resource Clinic and the most unlike its peers is Compassion Ministries Ltd. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds NEW BEGINNINGS PREGNANCY SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds NEW BEGINNINGS PREGNANCY HELP CENTER ↗
- Who funds Cabot Crisis Pregnancy Center ↗
- Who funds PREGNANCY RESOURCE CENTER FOR SOUTHWEST ARKANSAS ↗
- Who funds SOUTH ARKANSAS CARING PREGNANCY CENTER ↗
- Who funds HEART TO HEART PREGNANCY SUPPORT CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds 1st Choice Pregnancy Resource Center Inc ↗
- Who funds INFORMED CHOICES WOMEN'S CENTER OF THE OZARKS INC ↗
- Who funds CRISIS PREGNANCY CENTER OF CENTRAL ARKANSAS ↗
- Who funds ARKANSAS BAPTIST CHILDREN'S HOME & FAMILY MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds CHOICES PREGNANCY RESOURCE CLINIC ↗
- Who funds The Alpha Center Inc ↗
- Who funds ST JOSEPH'S HELPERS OF PULASKI COUNTY ↗
- Who funds AGAPE CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds Pathway Resource Center ↗
- Who funds COMPASSION MINISTRIES LTD ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Knights of Columbus Charities Inc · Arkansas Community Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Arkansas Right to Life Inc Ed Fund funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Arkansas Right to Life Inc Ed Fund?
Find your warmest path to Arkansas Right to Life Inc Ed Fund through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.