Loading…
· Public charity
ARKANSAS FOODBANK
The ARKANSAS FOODBANK acquires, through local and national partnerships, large quantities of food and other resources to distribute to hungry people in the state of arkansas.
$602k
Granted FY2022
1
Grants
1
Communities
$6k
Largest
01What you fund
01
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 85% of ARKANSAS FOODBANK’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.
02beneath the categories
Past the labels — and the year it shifted
Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.
…and in their own words, year by year
2018
increasechurch
2021
partner expandexpand abilityability clients
2022
—
Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.
03FY2022 · 1 grant
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
$5,800
Median grant
1
States reached
$42M
Total assets
Largest grants
- POTLUCK FOOD RESCUE POT60$5,800
02The need
04
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
show:
Your human-services grants (FY17–18, $13k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12% — the area typically sits at 16%. 0% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
03Your field
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
1
Mid-South Food Bank
Collection & distribution of food to charitable organizations serving those in need.
Food & Nutrition
2
Second Harvest Food Bank of Northeast Tn
To feed the hungry in ne tn by securing and distributing food and engaging the community.
Food & Nutrition
3
Gods Pantry
Provide food and clothing for the needy
Food & Nutrition
4
Regional Food Bank of Oklahoma Inc
Solicitation and receipt of food items from local, regional and national food companies, and distribution of these items to other charitable food programs in central and western oklahoma.establishing and growing relationships with…
Food & Nutrition
5
Faith Food Bank
To provide food to the needy
Food & Nutrition
6
United Ministries Food Bank of Robertson Co Inc
Food bank
Human Services
7
Augusta Community Caring Center Inc
Food Pantry, Utility Assistance, Clothing and Household Items Assistance
Community Improvement
8
Project Hope Food Bank Inc
Providing affordable and healthy food to food pantries and feeding programs that serve those at risk of hunger in west central arkansas.
Food & Nutrition
9
Regional Food Bank of Northeast Florida Inc
Feeding Northeast Florida works to permanently end hunger in Northeast Florida by providing nutritious foods and other essential goods to people facing hunger, by addressing food insecurity, poverty and poor health through education and…
Food & Nutrition
10
Seeds That Feed
Mission Statement: Moving real food, to those that need it most, in real-time. Through the collection and redistribution of surplus foods directly from regional farms and retailers to under-resourced populations we are able to break down…
Food & Nutrition
11
Tillman County Food Bank
—
12
Food Bank of Alaska
Food Bank of Alaska believes no one deserves to be hungry We are dedicated to eliminating hunger in Alaska
Food & Nutrition
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Family Resource Service of Lonoke Inc and the most unlike its peers is University of Arkansas Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network
9 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.
0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/9
Grantees still filing
4/9
Grew since you first funded
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Other$109,084Human Services$13,062Food & Nutrition$5,800
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Arkansas Community Foundation IncAR20.8× affinity8 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →
Open a dossier: Arkansas Community Foundation Inc · Arkansas Hunger Relief Alliance Inc · Southern Bancorp Capital Partners · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organisation ARKANSAS FOODBANK funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
typical government reliance, FY20–24
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
04Through Plinth
Through Plinth
Your grantmaking, live and operational
This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: CLEBURNE COUNTY CARES.
Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk
Financial management
low risk
~39 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 8 filed years.
Track record & reputation
low risk
8 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up +98% since.
Legal standing
low risk
US 501(c)(3); EIN 581724132 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.
Governance
Live in Plinth
Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.
Compliance & sanctions
Live in Plinth
OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.
Program capacity
Live in Plinth
Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.
Live · Plinth’s real DD engine
Run the actual assessment on CLEBURNE COUNTY CARES, cold from public data.
Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.
Post-award monitoring · continuous checks
- On trackFinancial stability— Roughly 39 months of cash on hand.
- On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
- On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 2% of their budget — diversified.
- Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.
What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.
Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing
Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro
How do I get to Arkansas Foodbank?
Find your warmest path to Arkansas Foodbank through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.
Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.
More from the funding graph
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars pass through an intermediary
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
Strange bedfellows
the named clusters of US funding
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines