How much did SOUTHERN BANCORP CAPITAL PARTNERS grant in FY2024?

Education$2.8MCommunity Improvement$485kHuman Services$379kYouth Development$254kCrime & Legal$149kArts & Culture$137kPhilanthropy$78kHealth$65kReligion$40kOther$2.8M

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2018

—

2019

—

2020

coronavirus relief

2021

coronavirus relief

2022

—

2023

—

2024

—

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$332,146

Median grant

States reached

$49M

Total assets

Largest grants

ARKADELPHIA PROMISE FOUNDATION$332,146

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–21, $339k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18% — the area typically sits at 15%. 73% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

55%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$4.0M · 30 repeat orgs$3.2M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +45% since the first grant, against +23% for the ones you funded once.

30 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2024, 29 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

126

Total granted

$4.0M

$3.2M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+45%

+23%

Still filing today

40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Human ServicesCommunity ImprovementEducationYouth DevelopmentHealthArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

MN
MORGAN NICK FOUNDATION
2× · 2020–2021 · $149k · revenue +474%
BH
BRANDON HOUSE CULTURAL & PERFORMING ARTS CENTER
2× · 2020–2021 · $80k · revenue +265%
BC
BETTER COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
2× · 2020–2021 · $70k · revenue +39%

Funded once

UL
URBAN LEAGUE OF ARKANSASgraduated
one grant, 2020 · $450k · revenue +38% · 63% of their budget
AB
ARKANSAS BLACK MAYOR'S ASSOCIATION
one grant, 2021 · $307k
UV
UNION VALLEY OUTREACH
one grant, 2021 · $145k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Arkansas Employment Career Center

Arkansas employment career centers' mission is to assist individuals with career opportunities through education and training. the primary target groups are individuals returning home from incarceration, veterans, homeless, and young…

Human Services

Center Ridge Mouth House Ministry

Service low income members in the community with food, clothing, house hold items, living essentials

Human Services

South Arkansas Development Center

To serve developmentally disabled individuals and their families in the least restrictive setting.

—

Arkansas Community Organizations

Promote social and economic justice and welfare.

Community Improvement

Arkansas Children's Inc

We champion children by making them better today and healthier tomorrow.

Health

Central Arkansas Development

To provide services to low income individuals.

Community Improvement

Arkansas Land & Farm Development

The organization provides training and service assistance to farm development, community education programs, land retention, program management, housing, rural and community development

Food & Nutrition

UrbanPromise Arkansas Inc

To equip students with the skills necessary for academic achievement, spiritual growth, and life management as servant leaders.

Youth Development

Arkansas Elder Outreach of Little Rock

Provide the best possible care and services for the elderly and disabled and providing other healthcare services.

Health

Feed Arkansas Kids

Feed arkansas kids is a ministry through the church at rock creek that provides weekend meals for insecure children of central arkansas

Food & Nutrition

Family Network Inc

To meet the needs of families in northwest arkansas for individualized parenting education and family support.

Crime & Legal

Mississippi County Arkansas Economic Opportunity Commission Inc

Provide support, education and training for Low-Income indivuduals to help become self-sufficient and lead lives of dignity

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Phoenix Youth & Family Services Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Arkansas Regional Innovation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 15 years old; the field is 13. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 4% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

4%6/156

the rest of the field

15%

821/5,549

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

73 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

62/73

Grantees still filing

43/73

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Education$2,819,886Other$3,030,318Community Improvement$484,592Human Services$378,707Youth Development$253,585Crime & Legal$148,990Arts & Culture$137,422

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Arkansas Community Foundation IncAR66.8× affinity44 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Arkansas Community Foundation Inc · Arkansas Hunger Relief Alliance Inc · The Winthrop Rockefeller Foundation · Arvest Foundation · Delta Dental of Arkansas Foundation Inc · Walton Family Foundation Inc · Heart of Arkansas United Way · Simmons First Foundation Inc · Windgate Charitable Foundation Inc · Arkansas Foodbank · Rebsamen Fund · Arkansas Humanities Council

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation SOUTHERN BANCORP CAPITAL PARTNERS funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: DREAM BELIEVE WORK FOUNDATION.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

insufficient risk

Limited financial data in public filings.

Track record & reputation

medium risk

3 years of Form 990 filings, still active.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 812183615 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on DREAM BELIEVE WORK FOUNDATION, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

Awaiting reportFinancial stability— Runway not derivable from filings.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2023; revenue grew over the period.
WatchReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 79% of their budget — load-bearing; a dependency Plinth would track.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Southern Bancorp Capital Partners?

Find your warmest path to Southern Bancorp Capital Partners through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

SOUTHERN BANCORP CAPITAL PARTNERS

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

73 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Southern Bancorp Capital Partners?

More from the funding graph

SOUTHERN BANCORP CAPITAL PARTNERS

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

73 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Southern Bancorp Capital Partners?

More from the funding graph