Skip to content
Arizona Hospital & Healthcare Association at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Arizona Hospital & Healthcare Association

Bringing together diverse voices to advance health and healthcare in arizona.

$345k
Granted FY2023
19
Grants FY2023
2
States reached
$40k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2023.

Health$661k
02FY2023 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 19 grants below total $333,670, the rows itemized in this filing. The $345,170 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $11,500 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$20,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$5.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
COBRE VALLEY REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER$40,125
BENSON HOSPITAL$30,250
VALLEYWISE HEALTH$30,000
SAN CARLOS RESERVATION$20,500
MOUNT GRAHAM REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER$20,250
CANYON VISTA MEDICAL CENTER$20,250
HAVASU REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER$20,125
LITTLE COLORADO MEDICAL CENTER$20,125
LA PAZ REGIONAL HOSPITAL$20,125
NORTHERN COCHISE COMMUNITY HOSPITAL$20,000
ARIZONANS FOR BETTER HEALTHCARE$11,545
HOLY CROSS HOSPITAL$10,250
GILA RIVER HEALTH CARE$10,125
SAGE MEMORIAL HOSPITAL$10,000
ARIZONA STATE HOSPITAL$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY19–23) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%ARIZONANS FOR BETTER HEALTHCARE: $95k → 11%GILA RIVER HEALTH CARE: $10k → 11%MOUNT GRAHAM REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER: $20k → 15%HAVASU REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER: $20k → 17%BENSON HOSPITAL: $30k → 18%COBRE VALLEY REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER: $40k → 19%HOLY CROSS HOSPITAL: $10k → 19%LA PAZ REGIONAL HOSPITAL: $20k → 20%LITTLE COLORADO MEDICAL CENTER: $20k → 26%SAGE MEMORIAL HOSPITAL: $10k → 28%AMERICAN HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE: $10k → 14%ARIZONANS FOR BETTER HEALTHCARE: $76k → 11%GILA RIVER HEALTH CARE: $10k → 11%MOUNT GRAHAM REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER: $10k → 15%HAVASU REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER: $10k → 17%BENSON HOSPITAL: $20k → 18%COBRE VALLEY REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER: $10k → 19%HOLY CROSS HOSPITAL: $10k → 19%LA PAZ REGIONAL HOSPITAL: $10k → 20%LITTLE COLORADO MEDICAL CENTER: $10k → 26%WHITE MOUNTAIN REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER: $10k → 28%AMERICAN HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE: $6k → 14%ARIZONANS FOR BETTER HEALTHCARE: $12k → 11%SAN CARLOS RESERVATION: $21k → 15%VALLEY VIEW MEDICAL CENTER: $10k → 17%COPPER QUEEN COMMUNITY HOSPITAL: $10k → 18%VALLEYWISE HEALTH: $30k → 11%SAN CARLOS RESERVATION: $10k → 15%CANYON VISTA MEDICAL CENTER: $20k → 18%VALLEYWISE HEALTH: $20k → 11%NORTHERN COCHISE COMMUNITY HOSPITAL: $20k → 15%CANYON VISTA MEDICAL CENTER: $10k → 18%ARIZONA STATE HOSPITAL: $10k → 11%NORTHERN COCHISE COMMUNITY HOSPITAL: $10k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$601k · 14 repeat orgs$60k to everyone else

14 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2023, 1 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
6

Total granted

$601k
$60k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+28%
+87%

Still filing today

64%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 82% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $60k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23
HealthCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AF
    ARIZONANS FOR BETTER HEALTHCARE
    3× · 2021–2023 · $182k · revenue +30% · 100% of their budget
  • BH
    BENSON HOSPITAL CORPORATION
    3× · 2020–2023 · $50k · revenue +28%
  • CV
    Cobre Valley Regional Medical Center
    3× · 2020–2023 · $50k · revenue +65%

Funded once

  • VV
    VALLEY VIEW MEDICAL CENTER AUXILIARY
    one grant, 2023 · $10k
  • SO
    State of Arizona
    one grant, 2023 · $10k
  • CT
    COALITION TO STRENGTHEN AMERICA'S HEALTH CAREgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue +910%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Banner -University Medical Group

Assist banner health complete its mission to make health care easier so life can be better by providing integrated & coordinated care & population health management.

Health
2
Northern Arizona Healthcare Corporation

Improving health, healing people.

Health
3
Banner Medical Group

To assist banner health complete its mission, banner medical group (bmg) was created to make health care easier, so life can be better by providing integrated & coordinated care & population health management.

Health
4
Banner Medical Group Colorado

Assist banner health to complete its mission to make health care easier, so life can be better by providing integrated & coordinated care & population health management.

Health
5
Washoe Barton Medical Clinic

Our mission is to care for your health and wellness. Our vision is to strengthen our community by providing accessible, affordable, high quality healthcare to all.

Health
6
San Juan Regional Medical Center

Better is our mission, improving lives through personalized health and care

Health
7
Moab Valley Healthcare Inc

Our dedicated team puts the patient first, delivers quality cost-effective healthcare and promotes wellness to all we serve.

Health
8
Southwest Medical Center

To be the leading provider of excellent healthcare for the communities we serve.

Health
9
Methodist Medical Center

Methodist Medical Center provides quality healthcare, in alignment with Covenant Health's mission to serve the community by improving the quality of life through better health regardless of a patient's ability to pay.

Health
10
Southern New Hampshire Medical Center

Southern New Hampshire Medical Center is dedicated to providing exceptional care that improves the health and well-being of individuals and communities we serve. Southern New Hampshire Medical Center is a provider of choice, delivering…

Health
11
Cumberland Medical Center

Cumberland Medical Center provides quality healthcare, in alignment with Covenant Health's mission to serve the community by improving the quality of life through better health, regardless of the patient's ability to pay.

Health
12
Fort Loudoun Medical Center

Fort Loudoun Medical Center provides quality healthcare, in alignment with Covenant Health's mission to serve the community by improving the quality of life through better health, regardless of a patient's ability to pay.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Verde Valley Medical Center; the most unlike its peers is Havasu Regional Medical Ctr Auxiliary. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/21
Grantees still filing
19/21
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Cobre Valley Regional Medical Center: $50,125 · HealthCobre Valley Regional Medical CenterVALLEYWISE HEALTH FOUNDATION: $50,000 · HealthVALLEYWISE HEALTH FOUNDATIONMt Graham Regional Medical Center Inc: $30,250 · HealthMt Graham Regional Medical Center IncHAVASU REGIONAL MEDICAL CTR AUXILIARY: $30,125 · HealthHAVASU REGIONAL MEDICAL CTR AUXILIARYLa Paz Regional Hospital: $30,125 · HealthLa Paz Regional HospitalLITTLE COLORADO MEDICAL CENTER: $30,125 · HealthLITTLE COLORADO MEDICAL CENTERNORTHERN COCHISE COMMUNITY HOSPITAL INC: $30,000 · HealthNORTHERN COCHISE COMMUNITY HOSPITAL INCCOALITION TO STRENGTHEN AMERICA'S HEALTH CARE: $10,000 · HealthBISBEE HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION INC: $10,000 · HealthWhite Mountain Regional Medical Center: $10,000 · HealthNAVAJO HEALTH FOUNDATION - SAGE MEMORIAL HOSPITAL INC: $10,000 · HealthBENSON HOSPITAL CORPORATION: $50,250 · OtherBENSON HOSPITAL CORPORATIONSan Carlos Apache Tribe V00523: $30,500 · OtherSan Carlos Apache Tribe V00523CANYON VISTA MEDICAL CENTER: $30,250 · OtherCANYON VISTA MEDICAL CENTERHOLY CROSS HOSPITAL: $20,250 · OtherHOLY CROSS HOSPITALGILA RIVER HEALTH CARE CORPORATION: $20,125 · OtherGILA RIVER HEALTH CARE CORPORATI…AHA PAC (Fund for Political Education): $15,965 · OtherAHA PAC (Fund for Political Educ…VALLEY VIEW MEDICAL CENTER AUXILIARY: $10,000 · OtherVALLEY VIEW MEDICAL CENTER AUXIL…State of Arizona: $10,000 · OtherState of ArizonaARIZONANS FOR BETTER HEALTHCARE: $182,449 · Civil RightsARIZONANS FOR BETTER HEALTHCARE
Health$290,750Other$187,340Civil Rights$182,449

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetARIZONANS FOR BETTER HEALTHCARE: $182,449 over 3y, 100% of budgetBENSON HOSPITAL CORPORATION: $50,250 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCobre Valley Regional Medical Center: $50,125 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetVALLEYWISE HEALTH FOUNDATION: $50,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetMt Graham Regional Medical Center Inc: $30,250 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLa Paz Regional Hospital: $30,125 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetLITTLE COLORADO MEDICAL CENTER: $30,125 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetNORTHERN COCHISE COMMUNITY HOSPITAL INC: $30,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCOALITION TO STRENGTHEN AMERICA'S HEALTH CARE: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetBISBEE HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWhite Mountain Regional Medical Center: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNAVAJO HEALTH FOUNDATION - SAGE MEMORIAL HOSPITAL INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Arizona Community Fou…Arizona Healthiest St…Health First Foundati…National Indian Healt…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Arizona Community FoundationAZ20.8× affinity9 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Arizona Community Foundation · Arizona Healthiest State Foundation · Health First Foundation-Northern Arizona · National Indian Health Board · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Arizona Hospital & Healthcare Association funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Arizona Hospital & Healthcare Association. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Arizona Hospital & Healthcare Association?

    Find your warmest path to Arizona Hospital & Healthcare Association through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports $8k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2023, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Arizona Hospital & Healthcare Association’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home