Skip to content

· Private foundation

Ariko Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$150k
Granted FY2025still arriving
21
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Environment$395kArts & Culture$363kHealth$234kHuman Services$159kFood & Nutrition$145kInternational$70kReligion$41kRecreation & Sports$10kOther$0
02FY2025 · 21 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k12 grants · $60k
  • $10k–50k9 grants · $90k
$5,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$2.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UCSF FOUNDATION$10,000
ENVIROMENTAL DEFENSE FUND$10,000
MONTALVO ARTS CENTER$10,000
NATURAL RESOUCE DEFENSE FUND$10,000
SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK$10,000
OXFAM$10,000
FEEDING AMERICA$10,000
CONSERVATION INTL$10,000
LUCILLE PACKARD CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL$10,000
AMERICAN KIDNEY FUND$5,000
PACIFIC CLINICS$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
NATIONAL PARKS CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION$5,000
SAN JOSE MUSEUM OF ART$5,000
ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–18, $60k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%UPLIFT FAMILY SERVICES: $40k → 8%Uplift Family Services: $20k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
MA
SD
CA
VA
MD
TN
DC
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.3M · 33 repeat orgs$113k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +50% since the first grant, against +12% for those funded once.

33 repeat relationships: 20 still active in FY2025, 13 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

33
15

Total granted

$1.3M
$108k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+50%
+12%

Still filing today

55%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EnvironmentArts & CultureHealthHuman ServicesEducationAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MA
    MONTALVO ASSOCIATION
    7× · 2017–2025 · $238k · revenue +97%
  • CONSERVATION INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION
    8× · 2017–2025 · $85k · revenue +123%
  • PC
    PACIFIC CLINICS
    2× · 2017–2018 · $60k · revenue +239%

Funded once

  • NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INCgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $20k · revenue +37%
  • TS
    THE SUMMIT LEAGUE
    one grant, 2019 · $10k · revenue +1%
  • UM
    UCSF MEDICAL CENTER
    one grant, 2019 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
World Wildlife Fund Inc

Wwf's mission is to conserve nature and reduce the most pressing threats to the diversity of life on earth. (continued on schedule o)

Environment
2
Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Foundation

To engage and catalyze global seafood supply chains in rebuilding depleted fish stocks and reducing the environmental impacts of fishing and fish farming.

Animals
3
Ocean Conservancy

Ocean conservancy unites science, people, and policy to protect our ocean, today and for generations to come.

Environment
4
Project Drawdown

Project drawdown's mission is to drive meaningful climate action by advancing science-based solutions and strategies. project drawdown's work is focused on three pillars: science - advancing science-based climate solutions and strategies;…

Education
5
Lowell Observatory

The mission of lowell observatory is to pursue the study of astronomy, especially the study of our solar system and its evolution; to conduct pure research in astronomical phenomena; and to maintain quality public education and outreach…

Science & Tech
6
Science Museum of Minnesota

The museum's mission statement is "turn on the science: inspire learning. inform policy. improve lives."

Arts & Culture
7
Earth & Space Research

Increase societal understanding of the earth system through scientific research and education.

Science & Tech
8
Resource Renewal Institute

The resource renewal institute facilitates the creation, development and implementation of practical strategies to solve the entire complex environmental problem by addressing it comprehensively.

Environment
9
American Museum of Natural History

The museum's mission statement is: "to discover, interpret, and disseminate - through scientific research and education - knowledge about human cultures, the natural world, and the universe."

Arts & Culture
10
Chile-California Council

The Chile-California Council is a San Francisco-based nonprofit dedicated to developing and promoting joint endeavors and cooperative relations between Chile and California, as well as individuals, legal entities and other institutions in…

International
11
Fairchild Tropical Botanic Garden Inc

We harness the power of plants for humankind and share the joy and beauty of tropical gardening with everyone. fairchild tropical botanic garden is a museum of tropical plants within a world famous, 83-acre designed landscape. it was…

Environment
12
Sutter Bay Medical Foundation

Mission statement: mission: caring for our patients first and our people always. vision: to be the most comprehensive, integrated and connected health system for getting and staying well. values: excellence - we deliver high-quality,…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Environmental Defense Fund Incorporated; the most unlike its peers is Pacific Clinics. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 49 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
23/23
Grantees still filing
18/23
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

LUCILLE PACKARD CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $80,000 · OtherLUCILLE PACKARD CHILDREN'S HOSPITALSECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK: $65,000 · OtherSECOND HARVEST FOOD BANKUPLIFT FAMILY SERVICE: $58,500 · OtherUPLIFT FAMILY SERVICEFEEDING AMERICA: $45,000 · OtherFEEDING AMERICASIERRA CLUB: $40,000 · OtherSIERRA CLUBENVIROMENTAL DEFENSE FUND: $30,000 · OtherOXFAM: $30,000 · OtherNATURAL RESOUCE DEFENSE FUND: $30,000 · OtherRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE: $25,000 · OtherCITYTEAM MINISTRIES: $40,150 · OtherCITYTEAM MINISTRIESOXFAM-AMERICA INC: $35,000 · OtherFeeding America: $35,000 · Other+21 more: $209,150 · Other+21 moreMONTALVO ASSOCIATION: $238,000 · Arts & CultureMONTALVO ASSOCIATIONSAN FRANCISCO MUSEUM OF MODERN ART: $25,000 · Arts & CultureSAN FRANCISCO MUSEUM O…SAN JOSE MUSEUM OF ART ASSOCIATION: $15,000 · Arts & CultureTHE TECH INTERACTIVE: $15,000 · Arts & CultureCONSERVATION INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION: $85,000 · EnvironmentCONSERVATION INTE…ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED: $50,000 · EnvironmentENVIRONMENTAL DEF…PENINSULA OPEN SPACE TRUST: $45,000 · EnvironmentPENINSULA OPEN SP…NATIONAL PARKS CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION: $25,000 · EnvironmentNATIONAL PARKS CO…NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC: $20,000 · EnvironmentNATURAL RESOURCES…PACIFIC CLINICS: $60,000 · Human ServicesAmerican Heart Association Inc: $30,227 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $15,000 · HealthLUCILE PACKARD FOUNDATION FOR CHILDREN'S HEALTH: $5,000 · HealthPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $5,000 · HealthUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATION: $55,000 · EducationMONTEREY BAY AQUARIUM FOUNDATION: $45,000 · Animals
Other$722,800Arts & Culture$293,000Environment$225,000Human Services$60,000Health$55,227Education$55,000Animals$45,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMONTALVO ASSOCIATION: $238,000 over 7y, 1.1% of budgetCONSERVATION INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION: $85,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetPACIFIC CLINICS: $60,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATION: $55,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED: $50,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetPENINSULA OPEN SPACE TRUST: $45,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetMONTEREY BAY AQUARIUM FOUNDATION: $45,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetCITYTEAM MINISTRIES: $40,150 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetSIERRA CLUB: $40,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetOXFAM-AMERICA INC: $35,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetFeeding America: $35,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $30,227 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO MUSEUM OF MODERN ART: $25,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL PARKS CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION: $25,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES - BAY AREA: $15,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSAN JOSE MUSEUM OF ART ASSOCIATION: $15,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE TECH INTERACTIVE: $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SUMMIT LEAGUE: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLUCILE PACKARD FOUNDATION FOR CHILDREN'S HEALTH: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MONTALVO ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds CONSERVATION INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds PACIFIC CLINICS ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds PENINSULA OPEN SPACE TRUST ↗
  • Who funds MONTEREY BAY AQUARIUM FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CITYTEAM MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds SIERRA CLUB ↗
  • Who funds OXFAM-AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds Feeding America ↗
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds SAN FRANCISCO MUSEUM OF MODERN ART ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL PARKS CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC ↗
  • Who funds RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES - BAY AREA ↗
  • Who funds SAN JOSE MUSEUM OF ART ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds THE TECH INTERACTIVE ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds THE SUMMIT LEAGUE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The David and Lucile Packard FoundationCA13.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The David and Lucile Packard Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · American Endowment Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Ariko Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Ariko Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Oxfam-America Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 49 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Ariko Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph