· Private foundation
Archibald Foundation Inc
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- $10k–50k11 grants · $175k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $110k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| NE ORGANIC FARMING ASSOC OF NH | $60,000 |
| TOWN OF BEDFORD | $50,000 |
| GIRLS AT WORK | $25,000 |
| VASSAR COLLEGE | $25,000 |
| SOUTHERN SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION | $20,000 |
| MANCHESTER TRUE COLLABORATIVE | $20,000 |
| TALLAHASSEE MUSEUM | $15,000 |
| TALL TIMBERS RESEARCH INC | $15,000 |
| THE NATURE CONSERVANCY FLORIDA CHAPTER | $15,000 |
| EQUALITY HEALTH CENTER | $10,000 |
| TLC FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER | $10,000 |
| NEW HAMPSHIRE OUTRIGHT | $10,000 |
| LOVERING HEALTH CENTER | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $200k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 40% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
39 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2025, 28 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 74% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $75k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TTTALL TIMBERS FOUNDATION INC8× · 2017–2024 · $159k · revenue +851%
- CFCONCORD FEMINIST HEALTH CENTER9× · 2017–2025 · $129k · revenue +37%
- NCNH CIVICS7× · 2017–2023 · $125k · revenue +423%
Funded once
- ADADOPTION DREAMS COME TRUE INCone grant, 2024 · $25k · revenue 0%
- TTTO THE VILLAGE SQUARE INC BETSY COUCHone grant, 2017 · $20k
- GAGADSDEN ARTS CENTERone grant, 2017 · $20k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
New hampshire fiscal policy institute promotes opportunity and economic well-being for all new hampshire residents by producing and disseminating independent research and analysis to inform public policy.
The new hampshire center for nonprofits strengthens and gives voice to the state's nonprofit sector by providing leadership development programs, facilitating collaboration, and offering learning opportunities for nonprofit leaders, staff,…
Disability rights center - new hampshire protects, advances, and strengthens the legal rights and advocacy interests of all people with disabilities.
The Network supports accredited Diversion programs for at-risk youth involved with law enforcement to hold them accountable for their actions, ignite growth and community engagement, and encourage opportunities to develop compassion and…
We elevate and empower people of color in New Hampshire by fostering connections, changing systems, and meeting community needs to make a better Granite State where all belong.
To provide civil legal aid to people with low income and older (age 60 and up) adults.
Provide a range of high-quality, community-based, behavioral health services to empower individuals and families to live healthy and successful lives.
New england legal foundation (nelf) is the leading non-profit public interest law firm in the region addressing policy and constitutional concerns related to free enterprise. its mission is promoting public discourse on the proper role of…
The Granite State News Collaborative is a statewide multimedia news collaborative that draws on and amplifies the strengths of its members to expand and add missing dimensions to coverage of issues of concern to the NH public as a whole,…
To provide legal representation and social services advocacy to new hampshire low-income and underserved children across multiple legal contexts.
NOFA-NH actively promotes organic, regenerative, ecologically sound farming, gardening, eating, and land care practices for healthy communities. NOFA-NH helps people build local, just, and sustainable food systems.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Legal Services of North Florida Inc and the most unlike its peers is Manchester True Collaborative. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 25 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 7% of your grantees by number, and just 4% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
32 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 32 of the 47 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds SOUTHERN SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds TALL TIMBERS FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds CONCORD FEMINIST HEALTH CENTER ↗
- Who funds NH CIVICS ↗
- Who funds REFUGE HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds GIRLS AT WORK INC ↗
- Who funds VASSAR COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds New Hampshire Coalition Against Domestic & Sexual Violence ↗
- Who funds TLC FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER ↗
- Who funds New Hampshire Outright ↗
- Who funds MANCHESTER TRUE COLLABORATIVE ↗
- Who funds New Hampshire Catholic Charities ↗
- Who funds Families in Transition ↗
- Who funds THE WAY HOME INC ↗
- Who funds INNOCENCE PROJECT OF FLORIDA INC ↗
- Who funds ADOPTION DREAMS COME TRUE INC ↗
- Who funds END 68 HOURS OF HUNGER ↗
- Who funds FLORIDA LITFEST INC ↗
- Who funds MEDIA POWER YOUTH ↗
- Who funds ORGANIZATION FOR REFUGEE AND ↗
- Who funds LEGAL SERVICES OF NORTH FLORIDA INC ↗
- Who funds 1000 FRIENDS OF FLORIDA INC ↗
- Who funds NEW HAMPSHIRE FOSTER & ADOPTIVE PARENT ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds CRISPINS HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds LAND FOR GOOD INC ↗
- Who funds Childhood Cancer Lifeline ↗
- Who funds RIGHTS & DEMOCRACY EDUCATION FUND INC ↗
- Who funds TALL TIMBERS RESEARCH INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: New Hampshire Charitable Foundation · Eastern Bank Foundation · Endowment For Health Inc · Cogswell Benevolent Trust · Eversource Energy Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Network for Good · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Archibald Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Innocence Project of Florida Inc — 30% of income from government
- Legal Services of North Florida Inc — 27% of income from government
- Refuge House Inc — 10% of income from government
- Tall Timbers Research Inc — 10% of income from government
- Southern Scholarship Foundation Inc — 1% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Archibald Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to Archibald Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.