Skip to content
Arch Eagle Foundation at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Private foundation

Arch Eagle Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$269k
Granted FY2024still arriving
31
Grants FY2024still arriving
10
States reached
$75k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$833kArts & Culture$162kPhilanthropy$112kEnvironment$76kEducation$69kAnimals$45kReligion$14kHuman Services$14kOther$0
02FY2024 · 31 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k22 grants · $41k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $103k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $126k
$2,000
Median grant
10
States reached
$1.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MUSEUM OF AMERICAN PORCELAIN ART$75,000
HOLDEN ARBORETUM$50,500
WESTERN RESERVE LAND CONSERVANCY$25,000
LAKE HUMANE SOCIETY$20,000
CLEVELAND ANIMAL PROTECTIVE LEAGUE$15,000
CLEVELAND CLINIC PHILANTHROPY$12,000
JEWISH FEDERATION OF CLEVELAND$11,000
ONE TAIL AT A TIME$10,000
CLEVELAND CLINIC CHILDREN'S HOSPITA$10,000
NORTHERN NEVADA DENTAL HEALTH PROG$6,000
LAKE COUNTY YMCA$5,000
HOSPICE OF THE WESTERN RESERVE$3,000
Individual grant recipient$2,500
ROCHESTER INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY$2,000
TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 50% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 11%MYOSITIS ASSOCIATION: $2k → 9%MYOSITIS ASSOCIATION: $2k → 9%MYOSITIS ASSOCIATION: $1k → 9%SEEDS OF LITERACY: $1k → 17%MYOSITIS ASSOCIATION: $1k → 9%SEEDS OF LITERACY: $1k → 17%HOSPICE OF THE WESTERN RESERVE: $3k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IL
MI
NY
NV
IA
OH
PA
CA
CO
VA
MD
DE
AZ
TN
NC
DC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

83%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.0M · 23 repeat orgs$210k to everyone else

23 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2024, 15 since wound down; 22 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

23
16

Total granted

$1.0M
$40k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+35%
+94%

Still filing today

61%
19%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 34% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $169k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthEducationHuman ServicesArts & CultureAnimalsEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MO
    MUSEUM OF AMERICAN PORCELAIN ART
    5× · 2017–2024 · $147k · revenue +118%
  • UO
    University of Nevada Reno Foundation
    3× · 2017–2019 · $20k · revenue +35%
  • PS
    Playhouse Square Foundation
    4× · 2017–2020 · $10k · revenue +35%

Funded once

  • LC
    LAKE CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL
    one grant, 2018 · $10k
  • CH
    CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL CCF
    one grant, 2021 · $5k
  • CS
    CWRU SCHOOL OF NURSING
    one grant, 2021 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
2
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
3
The Cleveland Clinic Foundation Group Return

Caring for life, researching for health and educating those who serve.

Health
4
Target Als Foundation Inc

Our mission is to break down barriers to als research to find effective treatments. by uniting academia, the pharma and biotech industry, government, venture capital, related nonprofits, and the als community, we aim to overcome the…

Education
5
Lehigh Valley Hospital

Our mission is to heal, comfort and care for the people of our community by providing advanced and compassionate health care of superior quality and value, supported by education and research.

Health
6
John Carroll University

As a jesuit catholic university committed to academic rigor, inclusive excellence, and care for the whole person, john carroll university inspires individuals of intellect and character to learn, lead and serve in the community and…

Education
7
Case Western Reserve University

Case Western Reserve University is an independent, research-oriented university with broadly based strengths in health, including medicine, nursing and dentistry; in engineering; in the arts and sciences; and in law, management and social…

Education
8
Trihealth Physician Institute

Provides the community necessary medical care through specialty physicians.

Health
9
The Johns Hopkins Hospital

For more than 125 years, the mission of the johns hopkins hospital has been to lead the world in the diagnosis and treatment of disease and to train tomorrow's great physicians, nurses and scientists. above all, we aim to provide the…

Health
10
University of Miami

See Form 990, Part I, Line 1, Description of Organization Mission.

Education
11
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Fdn Group

Susan g. komen 's mission is to save lives by meeting the most critical needs in our communities & investing in breakthrough research to prevent & cure breast cancer.

—
12
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Arthritis Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Samaritan's Purse. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

32 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 32 of the 63 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
31/32
Grantees still filing
22/32
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS OF CLEVELAND: $704,090 · OtherUNIVERSITY HOSPITALS OF CLEVELANDNORTHERN NEVADA DENTAL HEALTH PROG: $37,350 · Other+40 more: $160,000 · Other+40 moreMUSEUM OF AMERICAN PORCELAIN ART: $146,750 · Arts & CultureMUSEUM OF AME…Playhouse Square Foundation: $10,000 · Arts & CulturePlayhouse Squ…+1 more: $2,000 · Arts & CultureJEWISH FEDERATION OF CLEVELAND: $83,000 · PhilanthropyPROSTATE CANCER FOUNDATION: $4,500 · Philanthropy+1 more: $1,000 · PhilanthropyTHE HOLDEN ARBORETUM: $50,500 · EnvironmentWESTERN RESERVE LAND CONSERVANCY: $25,000 · EnvironmentLAKE HUMANE SOCIETY: $20,000 · AnimalsTHE CLEVELAND ANIMAL PROTECTIVE LEAGUE: $15,000 · AnimalsONE TAIL AT A TIME NFP: $10,000 · AnimalsTHE CLEVELAND CLINIC FOUNDATION: $12,000 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $8,000 · HealthBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $6,500 · HealthAmerican Heart Association Inc: $4,000 · HealthARTHRITIS FOUNDATION INC: $3,000 · Health+1 more: $1,000 · HealthUniversity of Nevada Reno Foundation: $20,000 · EducationSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $3,000 · EducationMarietta College: $2,500 · EducationRochester Institute of Technology: $2,000 · Education
Other$901,440Arts & Culture$158,750Philanthropy$88,500Environment$75,500Animals$45,000Health$34,500Education$27,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMUSEUM OF AMERICAN PORCELAIN ART: $146,750 over 5y, 13% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF CLEVELAND: $83,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetTHE HOLDEN ARBORETUM: $50,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetWESTERN RESERVE LAND CONSERVANCY: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCATHOLIC COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLAKE HUMANE SOCIETY: $20,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetTHE CLEVELAND ANIMAL PROTECTIVE LEAGUE: $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE CLEVELAND CLINIC FOUNDATION: $12,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetONE TAIL AT A TIME NFP: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetPlayhouse Square Foundation: $10,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $8,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $6,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetThe Myositis Association: $5,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetPROSTATE CANCER FOUNDATION: $4,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetARTHRITIS FOUNDATION INC: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION INC: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHOSPICE OF THE WESTERN RESERVE INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMarietta College: $2,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetRochester Institute of Technology: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSEEDS OF LITERACY: $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetDOBAMA THEATRE INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetMAKE SCHOOLS SAFE INC DBA MAKE OUR SCHOOLS SAFE: $1,800 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetVOLUNTEER FLORIDA FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCROSSROADS HEALTH: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINTERNATIONAL READING ASSOCIATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF COLORADO INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWOMENSAFE INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MUSEUM OF AMERICAN PORCELAIN ART ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF CLEVELAND ↗
  • Who funds THE HOLDEN ARBORETUM ↗
  • Who funds WESTERN RESERVE LAND CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds CATHOLIC COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds University of Nevada Reno Foundation ↗
  • Who funds LAKE HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds THE CLEVELAND ANIMAL PROTECTIVE LEAGUE ↗
  • Who funds THE CLEVELAND CLINIC FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ONE TAIL AT A TIME NFP ↗
  • Who funds Playhouse Square Foundation ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC ↗
  • Who funds The Myositis Association ↗
  • Who funds PROSTATE CANCER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ARTHRITIS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds FISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds HOSPICE OF THE WESTERN RESERVE INC ↗
  • Who funds Marietta College ↗
  • Who funds Rochester Institute of Technology ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Cleveland Foundat…The O'Neill Brothers …Corinne L Dodero Foun…The Veale FoundationThe Sam J Frankino Fo…Robert H Reakirt Fdn …The Swagelok Foundati…Mightycause Charitabl…The Blackbaud Giving …Charities Aid Foundat…Gs Donor Advised Phil…Vanguard Charitable E…
The Cleveland FoundationOH23.1× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Cleveland Foundation · The O'Neill Brothers Foundation · Corinne L Dodero Foundation for the Arts and Sciences · The Veale Foundation · The Sam J Frankino Foundation · Robert H Reakirt Fdn Equities · The Swagelok Foundation · Mightycause Charitable Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Charities Aid Foundation America · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Arch Eagle Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Arch Eagle Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • Volunteer Florida Foundation Inc: 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Arch Eagle Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Arch Eagle Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 63 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Arch Eagle’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home