Skip to content

· Private foundation

Apple Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2023 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$66k
Granted FY2023
6
Grants FY2023
1
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2023.

Education$166kHousing & Shelter$60kHuman Services$60kFood & Nutrition$39kAnimals$23kRecreation & Sports$13kInternational$5kPhilanthropy$1k
02FY2023 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2023

  • Under $10k2 grants · $6k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $60k
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN$20,000
MILWAUKEE HOMELESS VETERANS INITIATIVE$20,000
WISCONSIN HUMANE SOCIETY$10,000
MILWAUKEE COLLEGE PREP SCHOOL$10,000
BLUE LOTUS FARM & RETREAT CENTER$5,000
MARQUETTE UNIVERSITY$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–23) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 91% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS USA: $2k → 17%BLUE LOTUS FARM & RETREAT CENTER: $5k → 6%RED ARROW CAMP FOUNDATION: $5k → 10%ST HYACINTH EMERGENCY FOOD PANTRY: $11k → 17%DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS USA: $1k → 17%BLUE LOTUS FARM & RETREAT CENTER: $5k → 6%RED ARROW CAMP FOUNDATION: $5k → 10%ST HYACINTH EMERGENCY FOOD PANTRY: $5k → 17%DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS USA: $1k → 17%BLUE LOTUS FARM & RETREAT CENTER: $5k → 6%RED ARROW CAMP FOUNDATION: $2k → 10%ST HYACINTH EMERGENCY FOOD PANTRY: $1k → 17%DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS USA: $1k → 17%BLUE LOTUS FARM & RETREAT CENTER: $2k → 6%CHARLES M BOESEL FOUNDATION: $1k → 10%THE SALVATION ARMY: $25k → 17%BLUE LOTUS FARM AND RETREAT CENTER: $1k → 6%RED ARROW CAMP FOUNDATION: $1k → 10%MILWAUKEE COLLEGE PREP SCHOOL: $10k → 17%MILWAUKEE COLLEGE PREP SCHOOL: $10k → 17%MILWAUKEE COLLEGE PREP SCHOOL: $10k → 17%MILWAUKEE COLLEGE PREP SCHOOL: $10k → 17%MILWAUKEE COLLEGE PREP: $5k → 17%WISCONSIN HUMANE SOCIETY: $10k → 17%WISCONSIN HUMANE SOCIETY: $5k → 17%WISCONSIN HUMANE SOCIETY: $5k → 17%WISCONSIN HUMANE SOCIETY: $2k → 17%WISCONSIN HUMANE SOCIETY: $1k → 17%ST BEN'S COMMUNITY MEAL: $10k → 17%ST BEN'S COMMUNITY MEAL: $5k → 17%ST BEN'S COMMUNITY MEAL: $5k → 17%MARQUETTE UNIVERSITY: $2k → 17%MARQUETTE UNIVERSITY: $1k → 17%MARQUETTE UNIVERSITY: $1k → 17%ST BEN'S COMMUNITY MEAL: $1k → 17%MARQUETTE UNIVERSITY: $1k → 17%MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN: $40k → 17%MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN: $25k → 17%MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN: $25k → 17%MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN: $20k → 17%SALVATION ARMY: $10k → 17%SALVATION ARMY: $5k → 17%MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN: $5k → 17%MILWAUKEE HOMELESS VETERANS INITIATIVE: $20k → 17%MILWAUKEE HOMELESS VETERANS INITIATIVE: $15k → 17%MILWAUKEE HOMELESS VETERANS INITIATIVE: $10k → 17%MILWAUKEE HOMELESS VETERANS INITIATIVE: $10k → 17%MILWAUKEE HOMELESS VETERANS INITIATIVE: $5k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$360k · 11 repeat orgs$7k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +98% since the first grant, against +32% for those funded once.

11 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2023, 5 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
3

Total granted

$360k
$7k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+98%
+32%

Still filing today

64%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’20’21’22’23
EducationPublic BenefitAnimalsPhilanthropyInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TM
    THE MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN INC
    5× · 2017–2023 · $115k · revenue +54%
  • MH
    MILWAUKEE HOMELESS VETERANS INITIATIVE INC
    5× · 2017–2023 · $60k · revenue +116%
  • WISCONSIN HUMANE SOCIETY
    5× · 2017–2023 · $23k · revenue +61%

Funded once

  • MS
    MCPREPARATORY SCHOOL OF WISCONSIN INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $5k · revenue +32%
  • CM
    CHARLES M BOESEL FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2017 · $1k
  • IO
    INTERFAITH OLDER ADULT PROGRAMS INC
    one grant, 2017 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Mathematics Institute of Wisconsin Co Kathryn Leverenz
Education
2
Milwaukee Institute of Art & Design Inc

The milwaukee institute of art and design's mission is to ignite curious minds through art, design and service. we value courage to seek our own path, integrity to pursue our lives and work with meaning, kindness to thoughtfully engage…

—
3
Michigan State University College of Law

The mission of the michigan state university college of law is to provide a rigorous educational program which prepares a diverse community of students to be national and international leaders in private legal practice, business and…

—
4
Medical Society of Milwaukee Foundation Inc
Health
5
Madonna University

The mission of madonna university, a catholic and franciscan institution of higher learning, is to instill in its students christain humanistic values, intellectual inquiry, a respect for university and a committment to serving others…

Education
6
Mcphs University

Mcphs university prepares students for careers in health care through teaching, scholarship, research, professional service and community engagement.

Education
7
Milwaukee Regional Medical Center Inc

The primary purpose of the medical center is to aid and support the development and provision of health services in wisconsin by assisting its members to develop and operate programs of education, research, and patient care. the medical…

Health
8
Milwaukee Excellence Inc

The mission of the organization is to provide a high quality education for all students with choices after graduation that will provide financial stability, inspire personal freedom to builda legacy.

—
9
Marian University Inc

Marian university is a catholic applied liberal arts community that welcomes diverse spiritual traditions sponsored by the congregation of sisters of st agnes. marian university engages students in the education of the whole person. we…

Education
10
Wisconsin Medical Credit Union

Wisconsin medical cu is a not for profit, member owned organization dedicated to meet the members needs by providing sound financial services including competitive rates, information and services while maintaining financial stability of…

—
11
Minnesota Medical Association

To be the leading voice of medicine to make minnesota the healthiest state and the best place to practice.

—
12
Marian University

To be a great catholic university dedicated to excellence in learning, achieved by teaching, research, & scholarly activities in franciscan & liberal arts tradition.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wisconsin Humane Society; the most unlike its peers is Marquette University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
8/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE SALVATION ARMY: $41,000 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMYMILWAUKEE COLLEGE PREP SCHOOL: $40,000 · OtherMILWAUKEE COLLEGE PREP SCHOOLST BEN'S COMMUNITY MEAL: $21,000 · OtherST BEN'S COMMUNITY MEALST HYACINTH EMERGENCY FOOD PANTRY: $18,000 · OtherST HYACINTH EMERGENCY FOOD PANTRYRED ARROW CAMP FOUNDATION INC: $13,000 · OtherRED ARROW CAMP FOUNDATION INC+2 more: $2,000 · OtherTHE MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN INC: $115,000 · EducationTHE MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN INCMarquette University: $6,000 · EducationMCPREPARATORY SCHOOL OF WISCONSIN INC: $5,000 · EducationMILWAUKEE HOMELESS VETERANS INITIATIVE INC: $60,000 · Public BenefitMILWAUKEE HOMELESS…WISCONSIN HUMANE SOCIETY: $23,000 · AnimalsBLUE LOTUS FARM & RETREAT CENTER INC: $18,000 · PhilanthropyMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $5,000 · International
Other$135,000Education$126,000Public Benefit$60,000Animals$23,000Philanthropy$18,000International$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN INC: $115,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMILWAUKEE HOMELESS VETERANS INITIATIVE INC: $60,000 over 5y, 2.0% of budgetWISCONSIN HUMANE SOCIETY: $23,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetBLUE LOTUS FARM & RETREAT CENTER INC: $18,000 over 5y, 1.6% of budgetRED ARROW CAMP FOUNDATION INC: $13,000 over 4y, 2.0% of budgetMarquette University: $6,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMCPREPARATORY SCHOOL OF WISCONSIN INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $5,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN INC ↗
  • Who funds MILWAUKEE HOMELESS VETERANS INITIATIVE INC ↗
  • Who funds WISCONSIN HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds BLUE LOTUS FARM & RETREAT CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds RED ARROW CAMP FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Marquette University ↗
  • Who funds MCPREPARATORY SCHOOL OF WISCONSIN INC ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Green Bay Packers FoundationWI13.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Green Bay Packers Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Apple Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Apple Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Apple Family Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Apple Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Apple Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph