Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Apple Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2023 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$66k
Granted FY2023
6
Grants FY2023
1
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172023.

Education$166kHousing & Shelter$60kHuman Services$60kFood & Nutrition$39kAnimals$23kRecreation & Sports$13kInternational$5kPhilanthropy$1k
02FY2023 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2023

  • Under $10k2 grants · $6k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $60k
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN$20,000
MILWAUKEE HOMELESS VETERANS INITIATIVE$20,000
WISCONSIN HUMANE SOCIETY$10,000
MILWAUKEE COLLEGE PREP SCHOOL$10,000
BLUE LOTUS FARM & RETREAT CENTER$5,000
MARQUETTE UNIVERSITY$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–23) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 91% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS USA: $2k → 17%BLUE LOTUS FARM & RETREAT CENTER: $5k → 6%RED ARROW CAMP FOUNDATION: $5k → 10%ST HYACINTH EMERGENCY FOOD PANTRY: $11k → 17%DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS USA: $1k → 17%BLUE LOTUS FARM & RETREAT CENTER: $5k → 6%RED ARROW CAMP FOUNDATION: $5k → 10%ST HYACINTH EMERGENCY FOOD PANTRY: $5k → 17%DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS USA: $1k → 17%BLUE LOTUS FARM & RETREAT CENTER: $5k → 6%RED ARROW CAMP FOUNDATION: $2k → 10%ST HYACINTH EMERGENCY FOOD PANTRY: $1k → 17%DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS USA: $1k → 17%BLUE LOTUS FARM & RETREAT CENTER: $2k → 6%RED ARROW CAMP FOUNDATION: $1k → 10%THE SALVATION ARMY: $25k → 17%BLUE LOTUS FARM AND RETREAT CENTER: $1k → 6%CHARLES M BOESEL FOUNDATION: $1k → 10%MILWAUKEE COLLEGE PREP SCHOOL: $10k → 17%MILWAUKEE COLLEGE PREP SCHOOL: $10k → 17%MILWAUKEE COLLEGE PREP SCHOOL: $10k → 17%MILWAUKEE COLLEGE PREP SCHOOL: $10k → 17%MILWAUKEE COLLEGE PREP: $5k → 17%WISCONSIN HUMANE SOCIETY: $10k → 17%WISCONSIN HUMANE SOCIETY: $5k → 17%WISCONSIN HUMANE SOCIETY: $5k → 17%WISCONSIN HUMANE SOCIETY: $2k → 17%WISCONSIN HUMANE SOCIETY: $1k → 17%ST BEN'S COMMUNITY MEAL: $10k → 17%ST BEN'S COMMUNITY MEAL: $5k → 17%ST BEN'S COMMUNITY MEAL: $5k → 17%MARQUETTE UNIVERSITY: $2k → 17%ST BEN'S COMMUNITY MEAL: $1k → 17%MARQUETTE UNIVERSITY: $1k → 17%MARQUETTE UNIVERSITY: $1k → 17%MARQUETTE UNIVERSITY: $1k → 17%MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN: $40k → 17%MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN: $25k → 17%MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN: $25k → 17%MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN: $20k → 17%SALVATION ARMY: $10k → 17%SALVATION ARMY: $5k → 17%MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN: $5k → 17%MILWAUKEE HOMELESS VETERANS INITIATIVE: $20k → 17%MILWAUKEE HOMELESS VETERANS INITIATIVE: $15k → 17%MILWAUKEE HOMELESS VETERANS INITIATIVE: $10k → 17%MILWAUKEE HOMELESS VETERANS INITIATIVE: $10k → 17%MILWAUKEE HOMELESS VETERANS INITIATIVE: $5k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$360k · 11 repeat orgs$7k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +98% since the first grant, against +32% for the ones you funded once.

11 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2023, 5 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
3

Total granted

$360k
$7k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+98%
+32%

Still filing today

64%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’20’21’22’23
EducationPublic BenefitAnimalsPhilanthropyInternationalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TM
    THE MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN INC
    5× · 2017–2023 · $115k · revenue +54%
  • MH
    MILWAUKEE HOMELESS VETERANS INITIATIVE INC
    5× · 2017–2023 · $60k · revenue +116%
  • WISCONSIN HUMANE SOCIETY
    5× · 2017–2023 · $23k · revenue +61%

Funded once

  • MS
    MCPREPARATORY SCHOOL OF WISCONSIN INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $5k · revenue +32%
  • CM
    CHARLES M BOESEL FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2017 · $1k
  • IO
    INTERFAITH OLDER ADULT PROGRAMS INC
    one grant, 2017 · $1k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Mathematics Institute of Wisconsin Co Kathryn Leverenz
Education
2
Milwaukee Institute of Art & Design Inc

The milwaukee institute of art and design's mission is to ignite curious minds through art, design and service. we value courage to seek our own path, integrity to pursue our lives and work with meaning, kindness to thoughtfully engage…

3
Michigan State University College of Law

The mission of the michigan state university college of law is to provide a rigorous educational program which prepares a diverse community of students to be national and international leaders in private legal practice, business and…

4
Medical Society of Milwaukee Foundation Inc
Health
5
Madonna University

The mission of madonna university, a catholic and franciscan institution of higher learning, is to instill in its students christain humanistic values, intellectual inquiry, a respect for university and a committment to serving others…

Education
6
Mcphs University

Mcphs university prepares students for careers in health care through teaching, scholarship, research, professional service and community engagement.

Education
7
Milwaukee Regional Medical Center Inc

The primary purpose of the medical center is to aid and support the development and provision of health services in wisconsin by assisting its members to develop and operate programs of education, research, and patient care. the medical…

Health
8
Milwaukee Excellence Inc

The mission of the organization is to provide a high quality education for all students with choices after graduation that will provide financial stability, inspire personal freedom to builda legacy.

9
Marian University Inc

Marian university is a catholic applied liberal arts community that welcomes diverse spiritual traditions sponsored by the congregation of sisters of st agnes. marian university engages students in the education of the whole person. we…

Education
10
Wisconsin Medical Credit Union

Wisconsin medical cu is a not for profit, member owned organization dedicated to meet the members needs by providing sound financial services including competitive rates, information and services while maintaining financial stability of…

11
Minnesota Medical Association

To be the leading voice of medicine to make minnesota the healthiest state and the best place to practice.

12
Marian University

To be a great catholic university dedicated to excellence in learning, achieved by teaching, research, & scholarly activities in franciscan & liberal arts tradition.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wisconsin Humane Society and the most unlike its peers is Marquette University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
8/8
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

THE SALVATION ARMY — $41,000 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMYMILWAUKEE COLLEGE PREP SCHOOL — $40,000 · OtherMILWAUKEE COLLEGE PREP SCHOOLST BEN'S COMMUNITY MEAL — $21,000 · OtherST BEN'S COMMUNITY MEALST HYACINTH EMERGENCY FOOD PANTRY — $18,000 · OtherST HYACINTH EMERGENCY FOOD PANTRYRED ARROW CAMP FOUNDATION INC — $13,000 · OtherRED ARROW CAMP FOUNDATION INC+2 more — $2,000 · OtherTHE MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN INC — $115,000 · EducationTHE MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN INCMarquette University — $6,000 · EducationMCPREPARATORY SCHOOL OF WISCONSIN INC — $5,000 · EducationMILWAUKEE HOMELESS VETERANS INITIATIVE INC — $60,000 · Public BenefitMILWAUKEE HOMELESS…WISCONSIN HUMANE SOCIETY — $23,000 · AnimalsBLUE LOTUS FARM & RETREAT CENTER INC — $18,000 · PhilanthropyMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $5,000 · International
Other$135,000Education$126,000Public Benefit$60,000Animals$23,000Philanthropy$18,000International$5,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN INC — $115,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMILWAUKEE HOMELESS VETERANS INITIATIVE INC — $60,000 over 5y, 2.0% of budgetWISCONSIN HUMANE SOCIETY — $23,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetBLUE LOTUS FARM & RETREAT CENTER INC — $18,000 over 5y, 1.6% of budgetRED ARROW CAMP FOUNDATION INC — $13,000 over 4y, 2.0% of budgetMarquette University — $6,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMCPREPARATORY SCHOOL OF WISCONSIN INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $5,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN INC
  • Who funds MILWAUKEE HOMELESS VETERANS INITIATIVE INC
  • Who funds WISCONSIN HUMANE SOCIETY
  • Who funds BLUE LOTUS FARM & RETREAT CENTER INC
  • Who funds RED ARROW CAMP FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds Marquette University
  • Who funds MCPREPARATORY SCHOOL OF WISCONSIN INC
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Green Bay Packers FoundationWI13.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Green Bay Packers Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Apple Family Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Apple Family Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Apple Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph