Skip to content

· Private foundation

Appel Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$164k
Granted FY2025still arriving
30
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$586kEducation$324kHuman Services$182kInternational$27kEnvironment$25kPhilanthropy$21kCivil Rights$9kCommunity Improvement$8kOther$0
02FY2025 · 30 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k26 grants · $59k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $55k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$2,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$2.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UCLA Foundation$50,000
Jay Schapira Med Foundation$25,000
Jewish Federation$15,000
UCLA Medical Hospitality Fund$14,500
Los Angeles Giving Circle$7,614
Concern Foundation$7,500
American Friends of the Israel Philharmonic Orchestra$5,000
City of Hope$5,000
American Jewish University$5,000
American Committe for Weizmann Institue of Science$5,000
Determined to Succeed$4,347
Individual grant recipient$2,500
Doctors without Borders$2,500
World Central Kitchen$2,000
Planned Parenthood Los Angeles$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $14k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 67% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%ISRAEL GUIDE DOG CENTER: $1k → 6%AL OTRO LADO: $300 → 11%PROJECT PROSPER: $1k → 12%ISRAEL GUIDE DOG CENTER: $750 → 6%CORAZON DE VIDA FOUNDATION: $572 → 10%BORDER ANGELS: $500 → 11%Israel Guide Dog Center: $500 → 6%CORAZON DE VIDA FOUNDATION: $400 → 10%CORAZON DE VIDA FOUNDATION: $284 → 10%Corazon de Vida Foundation: $249 → 10%CORAZON DE VIDA FOUNDATION: $244 → 10%CORAZON DE VIDA FOUNDATION: $226 → 10%VISTA DEL MAR: $1k → 14%CORAZON DE VIDA FOUNDATION: $222 → 10%DOWNTOWN WOMANS CENTER: $350 → 14%INNOCENCE PROJECT: $4k → 17%INNOCENCE PROJECT: $1k → 17%PARA LOS NINOS: $184 → 14%MIRY'S LIST: $106 → 14%ONE VOICE: $500 → 14%ONE VOICE: $250 → 14%ONE VOICE: $100 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

VT
WA
IL
NY
MA
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
UT
NE
MO
VA
MD
SC
DC
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$836k · 51 repeat orgs$107k to everyone else

51 repeat relationships: 19 still active in FY2025, 32 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

51
98

Total granted

$836k
$71k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+21%
+27%

Still filing today

53%
52%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 68% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $36k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalHuman ServicesEnvironmentHealthEducationCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CF
    CONCERN FOUNDATION
    8× · 2018–2025 · $41k · revenue +9%
  • MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC
    6× · 2017–2025 · $10k · revenue +98%
  • WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC
    3× · 2021–2025 · $8k · revenue +167%

Funded once

  • PJ
    PATRICK JOHNSON MD SPINE FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2020 · $15k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $5k
  • UJ
    UCLA JONSSON CANCER FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2023 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Union of Concerned Scientists Inc

The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.

International
2
Asociacion Interamericana Para La Defensa Del Ambiente

To strenghten people's ability to guarantee their individual and collective right to a healthy environment, via the development, implementation, and effective enforcement of national and international law.

Crime & Legal
3
Actionaid Usa

Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…

Social Science
4
Conservation International Foundation

Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.

Environment
5
Friends of the Earth

Friends of the earth strives for a more healthy and just world by defendng the environment and human health while advancing social and economic justice by conducting research and education, transforming the economy so it protects the…

Environment
6
The Water Research Foundation

The purpose of the water research foundation (wrf) is a definitive research organization to advance the science of all things water to better meet the evolving needs of its subscribers and the water sector. to engage exclusively in…

Environment
7
Center for International Environmental Law Inc

To investigate, research, write, publish, present conferences and teach with respect to global, regional, transboundary, and comparative environmental issues and to make the findings from such activities available to the general public; to…

International
8
American Flood Coalition Inc

To drive transformational adaptation to protect communities across the country from higher seas, stronger storms, and more frequent flooding.

Environment
9
International Biomedical Research Alliance

Our mission is to invest in and accelerate the development of the most promising future leaders in biomedical research with global impact.

Health
10
Environmental Law Alliance Worldwide

Educational & charitable. to provide legal and scientific information to public interest attorneys and scientists in numerous countries.

—
11
International Aids Vaccine Initiative Inc

A nonprofit scientific research organization that develops vaccines and antibodies for hiv, tuberculosis, and emerging infectious diseases.

International
12
Women Donors Network

Women donors network advances a just, equitable, and sustainable world through the power of philanthropy, women's leadership, and collective and individual action.

Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Waterorg; the most unlike its peers is Dive Warriors. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

94 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 94 of the 164 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
15
Early backer (in before they grew)
90/94
Grantees still filing
59/94
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UCLA DEPARTMENT OF UROLOGY: $225,750 · OtherUCLA DEPARTMENT OF UROLOGYJay Schapira Med Foundation: $207,500 · OtherJay Schapira Med FoundationJEWISH FEDERATION: $172,000 · OtherJEWISH FEDERATIONUCLA SEMEL FOUNDATION: $29,250 · Other+103 more: $181,040 · Other+103 moreUCLA FOUNDATION: $276,250 · EducationUCLA FOUNDATIONAMERICAN JEWISH UNIVERSITY: $12,500 · Education+7 more: $12,706 · EducationCONCERN FOUNDATION: $40,900 · PhilanthropyTHE CLEAR FUND: $1,500 · Philanthropy+2 more: $1,100 · PhilanthropyMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $9,750 · InternationalWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $8,000 · InternationalA JEWISH VOICE FOR PEACE: $2,500 · InternationalRAINFOREST TRUST: $2,000 · InternationalHEAL PALESTINE INC: $1,500 · InternationalSave The Children Federation Inc: $1,050 · InternationalWATERORG: $1,000 · InternationalWORLD RESOURCES INSTITUTE: $1,000 · International+4 more: $600 · InternationalTHE INNOCENCE PROJECT INC: $4,500 · Human ServicesISRAEL GUIDE DOG CENTER FOR THE BLIND: $2,250 · Human ServicesCORAZON DE VIDA FOUNDATION: $2,197 · Human ServicesVISTA DEL MAR CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES: $1,350 · Human ServicesProject Prosper Inc: $1,000 · Human ServicesCHARITY GLOBAL INC: $1,000 · Human ServicesOne Voice: $850 · Human ServicesBORDER ANGELS: $500 · Human Services+4 more: $940 · Human ServicesSOGOREA TE LAND TRUST: $5,000 · EnvironmentHEAL THE BAY: $2,100 · EnvironmentNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC: $1,500 · EnvironmentONLY ONE INC: $1,000 · EnvironmentLIVING DESERT THE: $750 · EnvironmentOCEANA INC: $500 · EnvironmentAPPARENT WINDS: $500 · Environment+3 more: $784 · EnvironmentSCRIPPS HEALTH: $2,500 · HealthDIDI HIRSCH PSYCHIATRIC SERVICE: $2,350 · HealthPLANNED PARENTHOOD LOS ANGELES: $2,000 · HealthNATIONAL HARM REDUCTION COALITION: $2,000 · HealthMALARIA CONSORTIUM US INC: $1,000 · HealthELLISON INSTITUTE RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $1,000 · HealthCUREBOUND: $515 · Health+3 more: $450 · Health
Other$815,540Education$301,456Philanthropy$43,500International$27,400Human Services$14,587Environment$12,134Health$11,815

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUCLA FOUNDATION: $276,250 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCONCERN FOUNDATION: $40,900 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetAMERICAN JEWISH UNIVERSITY: $12,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetDIVE WARRIORS: $10,000 over 5y, 43% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $9,750 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetDetermined to Succeed: $8,406 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $8,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSOGOREA TE LAND TRUST: $5,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF PALM SPRINGS AND DESERT AREA: $4,800 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetTHE INNOCENCE PROJECT INC: $4,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSIERRA CLUB: $4,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBeit T'Shuvah: $3,850 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetBEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY: $2,750 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSCRIPPS HEALTH: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetA JEWISH VOICE FOR PEACE: $2,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDIDI HIRSCH PSYCHIATRIC SERVICE: $2,350 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetISRAEL GUIDE DOG CENTER FOR THE BLIND: $2,250 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCORAZON DE VIDA FOUNDATION: $2,197 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetHEAL THE BAY: $2,100 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetRAINFOREST TRUST: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD LOS ANGELES: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL HARM REDUCTION COALITION: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSTOP CANCER: $1,600 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE COLBURN SCHOOL: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPEOPLE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $1,500 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetTREVOR PROJECT INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CLEAR FUND: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetVISTA DEL MAR CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES: $1,350 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetExtraordinary Families: $1,250 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSave The Children Federation Inc: $1,050 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWATERORG: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMALARIA CONSORTIUM US INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetONLY ONE INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetProject Prosper Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetWIKIMEDIA FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetELLISON INSTITUTE RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHARITY GLOBAL INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBNOS ESTHER MALKA INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSEX WORKERS OUTREACH PROJECT: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetWORLD RESOURCES INSTITUTE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHARVARD-WESTLAKE SCHOOL: $950 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetOne Voice: $850 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLIVING DESERT THE: $750 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCENTER FOR THE STUDY OF YOUNG PEOPLE IN GROUPS: $603 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetCUREBOUND: $515 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOSPICE OF SANTA BARBARA INC: $514 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UCLA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CONCERN FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN JEWISH UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds DIVE WARRIORS ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds Determined to Succeed ↗
  • Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
  • Who funds American Friends of Israel Philharmonic Orchestra ↗
  • Who funds SOGOREA TE LAND TRUST ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF PALM SPRINGS AND DESERT AREA ↗
  • Who funds THE INNOCENCE PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds SIERRA CLUB ↗
  • Who funds Beit T'Shuvah ↗
  • Who funds BEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds SCRIPPS HEALTH ↗
  • Who funds A JEWISH VOICE FOR PEACE ↗
  • Who funds DIDI HIRSCH PSYCHIATRIC SERVICE ↗
  • Who funds ISRAEL GUIDE DOG CENTER FOR THE BLIND ↗
  • Who funds CORAZON DE VIDA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HEAL THE BAY ↗
  • Who funds RAINFOREST TRUST ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

California Community FoundationCA21.3× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: California Community Foundation · Weingart Foundation · Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles · David & Sylvia Weisz Foundation · Conrad N Hilton Foundation · The Crail-Johnson Foundation · The Rose Hills Foundation · The Ralph M Parsons Foundation · Liberty Hill Foundation · Tides Foundation · The Intuit Foundation · The Annenberg Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Appel Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Appel Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • Save the Children Federation Inc: 30% of income from government
  • Bnos Esther Malka Inc: 2% of income from government
  • President and Fellows of Middlebury College: 1% of income from government
  • Sandy Hook Promise Foundation: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
20report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Appel Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Appel Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 164 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Appel Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph