Skip to content

· Private foundation

Apollos Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$890k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$400k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$1.9MCivil Rights$1.1MReligion$944kArts & Culture$287kHuman Services$170kPublic Benefit$60kPublic Safety & Disaster$16kCommunity Improvement$10kOther$0
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k5 grants · $105k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $385k
  • $250k+1 grant · $400k
$50,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$19M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WOODLANDS METHODIST CHURCH$400,000
STUDENTS LIFE OF AMERICA$200,000
CONCORDIA LUTHERAN HIGH SCHOOL$75,000
INTERCESSORS FOR AMERICA$60,000
STUDENTS LIFE OF AMERICA$50,000
STUDENTS LIFE OF AMERICA$25,000
STUDENTS LIFE OF AMERICA$25,000
WOODLANDS METHODIST CHURCH$25,000
TEXAS VALUES$20,000
JUDICIAL WATCH$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–24, $170k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 6% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Wounded Warrior Project: $10k → 16%Compassion United: $100k → 9%COMPASSION UNITED: $50k → 9%Compassion United: $10k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

78%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.5M · 8 repeat orgs$977k to everyone else

8 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
7

Total granted

$3.5M
$667k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+17%
+19%

Still filing today

63%
57%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 65% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $310k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Civil RightsPublic BenefitHuman ServicesEducationArts & CultureCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SF
    Students for Life of America Inc
    8× · 2017–2024 · $820k · revenue +176%
  • CL
    CONCORDIA LUTHERAN HIGH SCHOOL
    2× · 2024–2025 · $275k · revenue +17%
  • CU
    Compassion United
    3× · 2022–2024 · $160k · revenue +30%

Funded once

  • IM
    INTERNATIONAL MUSIC CAMP
    one grant, 2022 · $287k · revenue +19% · 27% of their budget
  • ND
    North Dakota State University
    one grant, 2022 · $250k
  • TR
    TEXAS RIGHT TO LIFE
    one grant, 2020 · $50k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Dallas International University

As a christian university, we provide education and research opportunities preparing global leaders to partner with local communities.

Education
2
Texas Tribune Inc

The texas tribune promotes civic engagement and public education across the state by producing and sharing for free public data interactives, statewide events and intensive and daily reporting on texas public policy, politics and current…

Education
3
Houston Christian University

The mission of houston christian university is to provide a learning experience that instills in students a passion for academic, spiritual, and professional excellence as a result of our central confession, "jesus christ is lord."

—
4
Texans for Vaccine Choice

Texans for vaccine choice exists to directly influence vaccine choice public policy and legislation

Health
5
Union University

Union university provides christ-centered education that promotes excellence and character development in service to church and society.

Education
6
Uatx

Uatx is a nonprofit dedicated to building a liberal arts university committed to freedom of inquiry, freedom of conscience, and civil discourse. to maintain these principles, the university will be fiercely independent financially,…

Education
7
Progress Texas Institute

The Progress Texas Institute provides research and strategic communications on issues with the ultimate goal of increasing civic engagement.

Civil Rights
8
Fielding Graduate University

We provide exemplary interdisciplinary programs for a community of scholar-practitioners within a distributed learning model grounded in student-driven inquiry and leading to enhanced knowledge.

—
9
Leadership Austin

Leadership austin connects and develops leaders to courageously engage and transform our communities.

Youth Development
10
Values United

Values united is a non-partisan organization that assists government employees and private-sector workers to report and publicize violations of the law safely, lawfully, and responsibly. we arrange professional legal advice for…

Education
11
Christianity Today International

Christianity Today is a global community inspired by evangelical conviction to advance the stories and ideas of the kingdom of God. Our mission is to elevate the storytellers and sages of the global church.

Religion
12
Colleyville Covenant Christian

The mission is to provide a biblically based classical college preparatory education that inspires a passion for excellence a heart of grace and the character of Christ.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Heritage Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Compassion United. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
7/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

WOODLANDS METHODIST CHURCH: $749,370 · OtherWOODLANDS METHODIST CHURCHSTUDENTS LIFE OF AMERICA: $300,000 · OtherSTUDENTS LIFE OF AMERICACONCORDIA LUTHERAN HIGH SCHOOL: $275,000 · OtherCONCORDIA LUTHERAN HIGH SCHOOLNorth Dakota State University: $250,000 · OtherNorth Dakota State UniversityINTERCESSORS FOR AMERICA INC: $195,000 · OtherINTERCESSORS FOR AMERICA INCTEXAS RIGHT TO LIFE EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION: $70,000 · Other+2 more: $60,000 · OtherCONCORDIA UNIVERSITY TEXAS: $1,025,000 · EducationCONCORDIA UNIVERSITY TEXASStudents for Life of America Inc: $820,000 · Civil RightsStudents for Life of Amer…TEXAS VALUES: $195,000 · Civil RightsTEXAS VALUESINTERNATIONAL MUSIC CAMP: $287,439 · Arts & CultureCompassion United: $160,000 · Human ServicesWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesTHE HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $50,000 · Public BenefitJUDICIAL WATCH INC: $10,000 · Public BenefitTEXAS VALUES ACTION: $10,000 · Community Improvement
Other$1,899,370Education$1,025,000Civil Rights$1,015,000Arts & Culture$287,439Human Services$170,000Public Benefit$60,000Community Improvement$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCONCORDIA UNIVERSITY TEXAS: $1,025,000 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetStudents for Life of America Inc: $820,000 over 8y, 1.3% of budgetINTERNATIONAL MUSIC CAMP: $287,439 over 1y, 27% of budgetCONCORDIA LUTHERAN HIGH SCHOOL: $275,000 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetTEXAS VALUES: $195,000 over 4y, 5.8% of budgetCompassion United: $160,000 over 3y, 4.6% of budgetTHE HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTEXAS VALUES ACTION: $10,000 over 1y, 3.8% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CONCORDIA UNIVERSITY TEXAS ↗
  • Who funds Students for Life of America Inc ↗
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL MUSIC CAMP ↗
  • Who funds CONCORDIA LUTHERAN HIGH SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds TEXAS VALUES ↗
  • Who funds Compassion United ↗
  • Who funds THE HERITAGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds JUDICIAL WATCH INC ↗
  • Who funds TEXAS VALUES ACTION ↗
  • Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Shell USA Company FoundationTX12.1× affinity4 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Shell USA Company Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Apollos Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Apollos Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%8%17%30%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Apollos’ filings →

More from the funding graph