Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants — funding profile →
Plinth

· Public charity

APM Cares Inc

APM Cares Inc.

$147k
Granted FY2024still arriving
4
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$21k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.

Human Services$718kReligion$279kCommunity Improvement$238kHousing & Shelter$190kHealth$83kEducation$78kInternational$73kPhilanthropy$66kOther$0
02FY2024 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 4 grants below total $38,615 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $147,465 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $108,850 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k3 grants · $18k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $21k
$5,855
Median grant
4
States reached
$60k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CAPSTONE COMMUNITY CHEST$21,050
TEAM RUBICON$5,855
FEEDING AMERICA$5,855
AMERICAN RED CROSS US$5,855
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–24, $412k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 30% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%PETALUMA PEOPLE SERVICES CTR: $8k → 8%VINE MAPLE PLACE: $10k → 9%CAPSTONE COMMUNITY CHEST: $81k → 9%VA OF REAL ESTATE PROFLS: $8k → 11%CAPSTONE COMMUNITY CHEST: $53k → 9%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $6k → 12%CAPSTONE COMMUNITY CHEST: $39k → 9%MILITARY WARRIORS SUPPORT FD: $100k → 16%CAPSTONE COMMUNITY CHEST: $27k → 9%BRIDGE RECEIVING CENTER: $25k → 9%EVERETT GOSPEL MISSION: $8k → 9%CAPSTONE COMMUNITY CHEST: $21k → 9%BRIDGE RECEIVING CENTER: $20k → 9%HEROES SPORTS INC: $8k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

VT
WA
ID
IL
NY
OR
NV
IA
CA
UT
CO
MO
VA
MD
NC
HI
AL
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

52%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$950k · 16 repeat orgs$886k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +39% since the first grant, against +11% for the ones you funded once.

16 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2024, 14 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
66

Total granted

$950k
$874k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+39%
+11%

Still filing today

88%
56%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 70% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $12k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHousing & ShelterReligionInternationalEducationCommunity ImprovementOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CC
    CAPSTONE COMMUNITY ACTION INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $220k · revenue +51%
  • HN
    HO'OLA NA PUA
    3× · 2020–2023 · $50k · revenue +2%
  • BR
    BRIDGE RECEIVING CENTER
    2× · 2020–2021 · $45k · revenue +334%

Funded once

  • MW
    MILITARY WARRIORS SUPPORT FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2021 · $100k · revenue -8%
  • AH
    ACCESSURF HAWAII INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $50k · revenue +100%
  • RC
    REVE CHURCH
    one grant, 2019 · $40k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Samaritan House Inc

Samaritan House is committed to fostering personal safety, growth, and self-sufficiency in adults and their children through freedom from domestic violence, sexual assault, and human trafficking and removing their risks of homelessness.

Housing & Shelter
2
Lifemoves

Lifemoves provides interim housing and supportive services for homeless families and individuals to rapidly return to stable housing and achieve long-term self-sufficiency.

—
3
Habitat for Humanity of Greater Sacramento Inc

Habitat for Humanity of Greater Sacramento is the local, independent affiliate of Habitat for Humanity International. We are locally governed, raise funds, and build locally in Sacramento and Yolo CountiesFounded in 1985, Habitat for…

—
4
Operation Homefront Inc

Build strong, stable, and secure military families so they can thrive - not simply struggle to get by - in the communities they've worked so hard to protect.

Community Improvement
5
Feeding San Diego

On a mission to connect every person facing hunger with nutritious meals by maximizing food rescue. through direct service and community partnerships, feeding san diego provides more than 26 million meals each year to children, families,…

Food & Nutrition
6
Ihs the Institute for Human Services Inc

Our mission, vision and approach to homelessness are rooted in core hawaiian values that guide our outcomes and overall impact.

Housing & Shelter
7
Homes for Veterans a Nj Non Profit Corporation

Our mission is to provide a holistic approach to support veterans with disabilities by removing barriers in every aspect of their lives. this includes funding customized, barrier-free home modificationssuch as wheelchair-accessible…

Housing & Shelter
8
Hawaii Foodbank Inc

Hawaii foodbank, inc. is a nonprofit organization established to collect, warehouse and distribute salvageable food to social agencies that feed the needy of hawaii. the company is a certified member of feeding america, a nonprofit…

Food & Nutrition
9
Habitat for Humanity of Washington and Dodge Counties Wisconsin Inc

Habitat for humanity of washington dodge counties, wisconsin, inc. is a locally-run affiliate of habitat for humanity international, a nonprofit ecumenical christian housing ministry. habitat for humanity works in partnership with people…

—
10
Americas Homeless Veterans

Our Goal is to eradicate homelessness for our Veterans using our resources to support the transition from the street to permanent housing with the primary mission of providing the support to obtain and sustain housing, food and shelter for…

—
11
Aerial Recovery

Aerial recovery's mission is to save lives and stop evil. through the creation and deployment of humanitarian special operators, aerial recovery brings together selected veterans, first responders, and mission-qualified civilians who,…

—
12
Swords to Plowshares Veterans Rights Organization

Swords to plowshares' mission is to heal the wounds of war, to restore dignity, hope and self-sufficiency to all veterans in need, and to significantly reduce homelessness and poverty among veterans.

Public Benefit

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hawaii Homeownership Center and the most unlike its peers is Antonia Smolin and Victor Smolin Scholarship. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyAffordable Housing Developm…Military Veterans SupportFood Banks and PantriesChild Abuse Advocacy Servic…Affordable Housing Construc…Community FoundationsPolicy Research and AdvocacyChristian Missionary Organi…Youth Sports Programs
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 25 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%8%<5yr14%11%5–10yr19%21%10–20yr16%33%20–35yr13%14%35–55yr16%13%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%24%<5yr14%11%5–10yr19%16%10–20yr16%23%20–35yr13%7%35–55yr16%19%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 8% of your grantees by number, and just 24% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 5% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
5%
4/82
the rest of the field
13%
240,392/1,819,483

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

62 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 62 of the 87 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
56/62
Grantees still filing
36/62
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

CAPSTONE COMMUNITY ACTION INC — $220,104 · Human ServicesCAPSTONE COMMUNITY ACTION INCMILITARY WARRIORS SUPPORT FOUNDATION — $100,000 · Human ServicesMILITARY WARRIORS SUPPORT FOUNDA…ACCESSURF HAWAII INC — $50,000 · Human ServicesACCESSURF HAWAII INCHO'OLA NA PUA — $50,000 · Human ServicesHO'OLA NA PUABRIDGE RECEIVING CENTER — $45,104 · Human ServicesBRIDGE RECEIVING CENTER+8 more — $71,465 · Human Services+8 moreREVE CHURCH — $40,000 · OtherREVE CHURCHNEUROFIT CENTER — $35,000 · OtherRAMIRO PENA MINISTRIES — $31,000 · OtherASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF THE EASTSIDE — $27,500 · OtherHABITAT FOR HUMANITY — $26,000 · OtherGRACE INTERNATIONAL CHURCHES AND MINISTRIES INC — $25,670 · OtherLIFE RESTORED CHURCH — $25,000 · OtherAligned Education Foundation — $25,000 · OtherSNOHOMISH COMMUNITY FOOD BANK — $24,897 · OtherIM A MOVEMENT NOT A MONUMENT — $30,100 · Other+47 more — $424,490 · Other+47 moreTHE VETERANS MOVEMENT FOUNDATION — $314,000 · Arts & CultureTHE VETERANS MOVEM…HOUSING HOPE — $52,500 · Housing & ShelterSLEEP IN HEAVENLY PEACE INC — $25,000 · Housing & ShelterHAWAII HOMEOWNERSHIP CENTER — $22,100 · Housing & ShelterHomeAid Hawaii — $10,000 · Housing & ShelterHabitat for Humanity Intl Yuba Sutter — $9,500 · Housing & ShelterYouth for Christ International Ministries — $28,480 · ReligionHIGH-5 CHARACTER DEVELOPMENT — $27,000 · ReligionACTS MINISTRY INC — $25,000 · ReligionLANCE WALLNAU MINISTRIES INC — $10,000 · ReligionGLOBAL SURGE INC — $6,000 · ReligionKEIKI O KA 'AINA PRESCHOOL INC — $30,000 · EducationAMVETS HAWAII SERVICE FOUNDATION CORP — $15,000 · EducationROCKBRIDGE SEMINARY — $10,000 · EducationHAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $25,650 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY WORLDWIDE — $10,388 · PhilanthropyNATL CHRISTIAN CHARITABLE FDN INC — $10,000 · Philanthropy
Human Services$536,673Other$714,657Arts & Culture$314,000Housing & Shelter$119,100Religion$96,480Education$55,000Philanthropy$46,038

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCAPSTONE COMMUNITY ACTION INC — $220,104 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetMILITARY WARRIORS SUPPORT FOUNDATION — $100,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetHOUSING HOPE — $52,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetACCESSURF HAWAII INC — $50,000 over 1y, 8.9% of budgetHO'OLA NA PUA — $50,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetBRIDGE RECEIVING CENTER — $45,104 over 2y, 6.6% of budgetKEIKI O KA 'AINA PRESCHOOL INC — $30,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetYouth for Christ International Ministries — $28,480 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF THE EASTSIDE — $27,500 over 3y, 2.7% of budgetHAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $25,650 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSLEEP IN HEAVENLY PEACE INC — $25,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetACTS MINISTRY INC — $25,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetSNOHOMISH COMMUNITY FOOD BANK — $24,897 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetHAWAII HOMEOWNERSHIP CENTER — $22,100 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetTHE SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL DIOCESAN COUNCIL OF AUSTIN — $22,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetAMVETS HAWAII SERVICE FOUNDATION CORP — $15,000 over 1y, 16% of budgetFABRETTO CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION INC — $14,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS PEOPLE INC — $14,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMAUI FOOD BANK INC — $13,150 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAFRICAN LEADERSHIP PARTNERS INC — $13,000 over 1y, 7.1% of budgetINST TEC ESPECIALIZADO JUAN PABLO II INC — $12,400 over 1y, 28% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $11,965 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED WAY WORLDWIDE — $10,388 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetROCKBRIDGE SEMINARY — $10,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetHomeAid Hawaii — $10,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetTHE SCOTCH — $10,000 over 1y, 4.9% of budgetYOUNG LIFE — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATL CHRISTIAN CHARITABLE FDN INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVINE MAPLE PLACE — $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTAKE A SOLDIER FISHING INC — $10,000 over 1y, 12% of budgetLANCE WALLNAU MINISTRIES INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetHabitat for Humanity Intl Yuba Sutter — $9,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetInternational We Love U Foundation East Coast Region Inc — $9,314 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetAMERICAN GI FORUM NATIONAL VETERANS OUTREACH PROGRAM INC — $8,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAREAA Aloha Chapter — $8,000 over 1y, 29% of budgetUSA Homeownership Foundation Inc — $8,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetEVERETT GOSPEL MISSION — $7,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetKITTITAS COUNTY HABITAT FOR HUMANITY — $7,500 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetSacramento Stand Down Association Inc — $7,500 over 1y, 16% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY SEATTLE-KING COUNTY — $7,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPETALUMA PEOPLE SERVICES CENTER — $7,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNon Commissioned Officers Association — $7,200 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetRISE AGAINST HUNGER INC — $7,071 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMercury One Inc — $7,070 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetINSTITUTE FOR GLOBAL HEALTH & HEALTH POLICY — $7,070 over 1y, 8.6% of budgetANTONIA SMOLIN AND VICTOR SMOLIN SCHOLARSHIP — $7,070 over 1y, 68% of budgetWounded Warrior Support Network — $6,500 over 1y, 12% of budgetRIVER CITY FOOD BANK — $6,250 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Puget Sound Energy Fo…Deacon Charitable Fou…The Albertsons Compan…Charis FundWindermere FoundationUmpqua Bank Charitabl…The Norcliffe Foundat…Renton Regional Commu…Community Foundation …Enterprise Holdings F…Sacramento Region Com…M J Murdock Charitabl…
Puget Sound Energy FoundationDE19.3× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Puget Sound Energy Foundation · Deacon Charitable Foundation · The Albertsons Companies Foundation · Charis Fund · Windermere Foundation · Umpqua Bank Charitable Foundation · The Norcliffe Foundation · Renton Regional Community Fndn · Community Foundation of Snohomish County · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · Sacramento Region Community Foundation · M J Murdock Charitable Trust

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization APM Cares Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%5%19%42%75%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 84%
  • Capstone Community Action Inc — 84% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
15report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to APM Cares Inc?

Find your warmest path to APM Cares Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 87 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines