Skip to content
APM Cares Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

APM Cares Inc

APM Cares Inc.

$182k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$56k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Human Services$718kReligion$279kCommunity Improvement$238kHousing & Shelter$190kHealth$83kEducation$78kInternational$73kPhilanthropy$66kOther$0
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 5 grants below total $91,265, the rows itemized in this filing. The $181,855 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $90,590 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $21k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $14k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $56k
$7,463
Median grant
3
States reached
$351k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CAPSTONE COMMUNITY CHEST$56,100
AMERICAN RED CROSS$14,239
FEEDING TEXAS$7,463
TEAM RUBICON$7,463
PCAR$6,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–25, $482k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 28% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%PETALUMA PEOPLE SERVICES CTR: $8k → 8%VINE MAPLE PLACE: $10k → 9%CAPSTONE COMMUNITY CHEST: $81k → 9%VA OF REAL ESTATE PROFLS: $8k → 11%CAPSTONE COMMUNITY CHEST: $56k → 9%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $14k → 12%CAPSTONE COMMUNITY CHEST: $53k → 9%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $6k → 12%MILITARY WARRIORS SUPPORT FD: $100k → 16%CAPSTONE COMMUNITY CHEST: $39k → 9%BRIDGE RECEIVING CENTER: $25k → 9%EVERETT GOSPEL MISSION: $8k → 9%CAPSTONE COMMUNITY CHEST: $27k → 9%BRIDGE RECEIVING CENTER: $20k → 9%CAPSTONE COMMUNITY CHEST: $21k → 9%HEROES SPORTS INC: $8k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

VT
WA
ID
IL
NY
OR
NV
IA
CA
UT
CO
MO
VA
MD
NC
HI
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

54%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.0M · 17 repeat orgs$894k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +39% since the first grant, against +11% for those funded once.

17 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 14 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
67

Total granted

$1.0M
$880k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+39%
+11%

Still filing today

88%
57%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $13k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHousing & ShelterReligionCommunity ImprovementInternationalEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CC
    CAPSTONE COMMUNITY ACTION INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $276k · revenue +51%
  • HN
    HO'OLA NA PUA
    3× · 2020–2023 · $50k · revenue +2%
  • BR
    BRIDGE RECEIVING CENTER
    2× · 2020–2021 · $45k · revenue +334%

Funded once

  • MW
    MILITARY WARRIORS SUPPORT FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2021 · $100k · revenue -8%
  • AH
    ACCESSURF HAWAII INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $50k · revenue +100%
  • RC
    REVE CHURCH
    one grant, 2019 · $40k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Homes for Veterans a Nj Non Profit Corporation

Our mission is to provide a holistic approach to support veterans with disabilities by removing barriers in every aspect of their lives. this includes funding customized, barrier-free home modificationssuch as wheelchair-accessible…

Housing & Shelter
2
Lifemoves

Lifemoves provides interim housing and supportive services for homeless families and individuals to rapidly return to stable housing and achieve long-term self-sufficiency.

—
3
Aerial Recovery

Aerial recovery's mission is to save lives and stop evil. through the creation and deployment of humanitarian special operators, aerial recovery brings together selected veterans, first responders, and mission-qualified civilians who,…

—
4
Ihs the Institute for Human Services Inc

Our mission, vision and approach to homelessness are rooted in core hawaiian values that guide our outcomes and overall impact.

Housing & Shelter
5
Hawaii Foodbank Inc

Hawaii foodbank, inc. is a nonprofit organization established to collect, warehouse and distribute salvageable food to social agencies that feed the needy of hawaii. the company is a certified member of feeding america, a nonprofit…

Food & Nutrition
6
Habitat for Humanity International Inc

Seeking to put god's love into action, habitat for humanity brings people together to build homes, communities, and hope.

International
7
Feeding San Diego

On a mission to connect every person facing hunger with nutritious meals by maximizing food rescue. through direct service and community partnerships, feeding san diego provides more than 26 million meals each year to children, families,…

Food & Nutrition
8
Maui Nui Resiliency Hui

Maui nui resiliency hui (mnrh) is committed to creating a more resilient and equitable future for maui county by focusing on affordable housing solutions that empower our community members. our mission is to collaborate, educate, and…

Education
9
Swords to Plowshares Veterans Rights Organization

Swords to plowshares' mission is to heal the wounds of war, to restore dignity, hope and self-sufficiency to all veterans in need, and to significantly reduce homelessness and poverty among veterans.

Public Benefit
10
Operation Homefront Inc

Build strong, stable, and secure military families so they can thrive - not simply struggle to get by - in the communities they've worked so hard to protect.

Community Improvement
11
Feeding Hawaii Together

To combat hunger on o'ahu by ensuring reliable access to nutritious, culturally appropriate food for all.

Human Services
12
Operation Stand Down Tennessee

Operation stand down tennessee (osdtn) engages, equips, and empowers military veterans and their families through crisis, career, connection, and community services.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mercury One Inc; the most unlike its peers is Antonia Smolin and Victor Smolin Scholarship. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

63 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 63 of the 89 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
57/63
Grantees still filing
36/63
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CAPSTONE COMMUNITY ACTION INC: $276,204 · Human ServicesCAPSTONE COMMUNITY ACTION INCMILITARY WARRIORS SUPPORT FOUNDATION: $100,000 · Human ServicesMILITARY WARRIORS SUPPORT FOUNDATI…HO'OLA NA PUA: $50,000 · Human ServicesHO'OLA NA PUAACCESSURF HAWAII INC: $50,000 · Human ServicesACCESSURF HAWAII INCBRIDGE RECEIVING CENTER: $45,104 · Human ServicesBRIDGE RECEIVING CENTERAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $26,204 · Human Services+7 more: $59,500 · Human Services+7 moreREVE CHURCH: $40,000 · OtherREVE CHURCHNEUROFIT CENTER: $35,000 · OtherRAMIRO PENA MINISTRIES: $31,000 · OtherASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF THE EASTSIDE: $27,500 · OtherHABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $26,000 · OtherGRACE INTERNATIONAL CHURCHES AND MINISTRIES INC: $25,670 · OtherAligned Education Foundation: $25,000 · OtherLIFE RESTORED CHURCH: $25,000 · OtherSNOHOMISH COMMUNITY FOOD BANK: $24,897 · OtherIM A MOVEMENT NOT A MONUMENT: $30,100 · Other+49 more: $445,416 · Other+49 moreTHE VETERANS MOVEMENT FOUNDATION: $314,000 · Arts & CultureTHE VETERANS MOVEM…HOUSING HOPE: $52,500 · Housing & ShelterSLEEP IN HEAVENLY PEACE INC: $25,000 · Housing & ShelterHAWAII HOMEOWNERSHIP CENTER: $22,100 · Housing & ShelterHomeAid Hawaii: $10,000 · Housing & ShelterHabitat for Humanity Intl Yuba Sutter: $9,500 · Housing & ShelterYouth for Christ International Ministries: $28,480 · ReligionHIGH-5 CHARACTER DEVELOPMENT: $27,000 · ReligionACTS MINISTRY INC: $25,000 · ReligionLANCE WALLNAU MINISTRIES INC: $10,000 · ReligionGLOBAL SURGE INC: $6,000 · ReligionKEIKI O KA 'AINA PRESCHOOL INC: $30,000 · EducationAMVETS HAWAII SERVICE FOUNDATION CORP: $15,000 · EducationROCKBRIDGE SEMINARY: $10,000 · EducationHAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $25,650 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY WORLDWIDE: $10,388 · PhilanthropyNATL CHRISTIAN CHARITABLE FDN INC: $10,000 · Philanthropy
Human Services$607,012Other$735,583Arts & Culture$314,000Housing & Shelter$119,100Religion$96,480Education$55,000Philanthropy$46,038

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCAPSTONE COMMUNITY ACTION INC: $276,204 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetMILITARY WARRIORS SUPPORT FOUNDATION: $100,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetHOUSING HOPE: $52,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetHO'OLA NA PUA: $50,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetACCESSURF HAWAII INC: $50,000 over 1y, 8.9% of budgetBRIDGE RECEIVING CENTER: $45,104 over 2y, 6.6% of budgetKEIKI O KA 'AINA PRESCHOOL INC: $30,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetYouth for Christ International Ministries: $28,480 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF THE EASTSIDE: $27,500 over 3y, 2.7% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $26,204 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $25,650 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSLEEP IN HEAVENLY PEACE INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetACTS MINISTRY INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetSNOHOMISH COMMUNITY FOOD BANK: $24,897 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetHAWAII HOMEOWNERSHIP CENTER: $22,100 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetTHE SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL DIOCESAN COUNCIL OF AUSTIN: $22,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetAMVETS HAWAII SERVICE FOUNDATION CORP: $15,000 over 1y, 16% of budgetFABRETTO CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION INC: $14,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS PEOPLE INC: $14,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTEAM RUBICON INC: $13,318 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMAUI FOOD BANK INC: $13,150 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAFRICAN LEADERSHIP PARTNERS INC: $13,000 over 1y, 7.1% of budgetINST TEC ESPECIALIZADO JUAN PABLO II INC: $12,400 over 1y, 28% of budgetUNITED WAY WORLDWIDE: $10,388 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLANCE WALLNAU MINISTRIES INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetVINE MAPLE PLACE: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE SCOTCH: $10,000 over 1y, 4.9% of budgetTAKE A SOLDIER FISHING INC: $10,000 over 1y, 12% of budgetROCKBRIDGE SEMINARY: $10,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetYOUNG LIFE: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATL CHRISTIAN CHARITABLE FDN INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHomeAid Hawaii: $10,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetHabitat for Humanity Intl Yuba Sutter: $9,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetInternational We Love U Foundation East Coast Region Inc: $9,314 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetAREAA Aloha Chapter: $8,000 over 1y, 29% of budgetUSA Homeownership Foundation Inc: $8,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN GI FORUM NATIONAL VETERANS OUTREACH PROGRAM INC: $8,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetKITTITAS COUNTY HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $7,500 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetSacramento Stand Down Association Inc: $7,500 over 1y, 16% of budgetEVERETT GOSPEL MISSION: $7,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPETALUMA PEOPLE SERVICES CENTER: $7,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY SEATTLE-KING COUNTY: $7,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFEEDING TEXAS: $7,463 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNon Commissioned Officers Association: $7,200 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetRISE AGAINST HUNGER INC: $7,071 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINSTITUTE FOR GLOBAL HEALTH & HEALTH POLICY: $7,070 over 1y, 8.6% of budgetANTONIA SMOLIN AND VICTOR SMOLIN SCHOLARSHIP: $7,070 over 1y, 68% of budgetMercury One Inc: $7,070 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Puget Sound Energy Fo…Deacon Charitable Fou…The Albertsons Compan…Charis FundWindermere FoundationUmpqua Bank Charitabl…The Norcliffe Foundat…Renton Regional Commu…Community Foundation …Enterprise Holdings F…Sacramento Region Com…M J Murdock Charitabl…
Puget Sound Energy FoundationDE19.3× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Puget Sound Energy Foundation · Deacon Charitable Foundation · The Albertsons Companies Foundation · Charis Fund · Windermere Foundation · Umpqua Bank Charitable Foundation · The Norcliffe Foundation · Renton Regional Community Fndn · Community Foundation of Snohomish County · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · Sacramento Region Community Foundation · M J Murdock Charitable Trust

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization APM Cares Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from APM Cares Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 84%
  • Capstone Community Action Inc: 84% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
15report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to APM Cares Inc?

Find your warmest path to APM Cares Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 89 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on APM Cares’ filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home