Skip to content
Anti Police-Terror Project Inc at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Anti Police-Terror Project Inc

To eradicate police terror in communities of color.

$1.2M
Granted FY2024still arriving
4
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$1.0M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its fieldRead
04Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2024.

Public Benefit$1.7MCivil Rights$628kHuman Services$535kHealth$310kPhilanthropy$287kArts & Culture$200kEnvironment$100kHousing & Shelter$100kOther$0
02FY2024 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 4 grants below total $1,080,256, the rows itemized in this filing. The $1,181,537 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $101,281 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k3 grants · $50k
  • $250k+1 grant · $1.0M
$21,835
Median grant
1
States reached
$3.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Peace Out Loud$1,030,051
The Sean Monterrosa Project$21,835
CA State University Los Angel$15,000
Black Arts Movement Business$13,370
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–22, $810k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Affect Real Change Inc: $400k → 10%Transgender Gender Variant: $200k → 10%Moms 4 Housing Incorporated: $100k → 24%Black Organizing Project: $55k → 10%Fam 1st Family Foundation: $55k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Jobs with Justice San Francisco

A long-term, strategic alliance of labor, community, faith-based, and student organizations working together to build greater economic power for workers and community members through employee rights at work and access to good jobs,…

Employment
2
Black Los Angeles County Client Coalition Inc

Mental health services advocacy

Human Services
3
Justice Funders

Serve as a partner, educator, and guide for philanthropy in reimagining practices that advance a thriving and just world.

—
4
Forward Together

Forward Together is a national reproductive justice organization that centers people, families, and communities who experience reproductive oppression. They prioritize queer, trans, Black, Indigenous, and other peoples of color and utilize…

Health
5
Black Mental Health & Wellness
Health
6
Trauma Informed La
Civil Rights
7
Safe Black Space

See Schedule OSafe Black Space creates opportunities for Black people to heal and thrive. Safe Black Space is designed to offer various services to address people of African ancestry's individual and community reactions to Cultural and…

—
8
California Center for Movement Legal Services

The California Center for Movement Legal Services (Movement Legal) provides legal services in the pursuit of improving the lives of California's traditionally underserved residents, carrying out legal work that fosters community led policy…

Crime & Legal
9
The Black Collaborative Inc
Community Improvement
10
Los Angeles Black Worker Center

The mission of the Los Angeles Black Worker Center is to increase access to quality jobs, reduce employment discrimination, and improve industries that employ black workers through action and unionization.

Employment
11
Black Women Birthing Justice Inc

Bwbj is a grass-roots collective out of oakland, ca. we identify as black women and individuals across the african diaspora and are committed to transforming birthing experiences for black women and birthing people.

Health
12
Lead Liberated

Through coaching and group facilitation, leaders of color heal from racism, develop skills to identify & interrupt racism in personal leadership, organizational practices & policies, and produce antiracist solutions in partnership with…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Motivating Inspiring Supporting and Serving Sexually Exploited Youth; the most unlike its peers is Escape Velocity Resources Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

25 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 25 of the 29 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

4
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
23/25
Grantees still filing
11/25
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Peace Out Loud: $1,528,251 · OtherPeace Out LoudCHRISTOPHER L JONES FOUNDATION SERVICES INC: $200,000 · OtherCHRISTOPHER L JONES FOUNDATION SERVICES INCSHELTERWOOD COLLECTIVE: $100,000 · Other+10 more: $360,000 · Other+10 moreAffect Real Change Inc: $400,000 · Human ServicesAffect Real Change IncMiss Major and Alexander L Lees TGIJP: $200,000 · Human ServicesMiss Major and Alexand…MOMS 4 HOUSING INC: $100,000 · Human ServicesMOMS 4 HOUSING INCThe Black Organizing Project Inc: $55,000 · Human ServicesThe Black Organizing P…FAM 1ST FAMILY FOUNDATION: $55,000 · Human ServicesFAM 1ST FAMILY FOUNDAT…ST JAMES INFIRMARY: $200,000 · HealthHEALTHY BLACK FAMILIES INC: $55,000 · HealthESCAPE VELOCITY RESOURCES FOUNDATION INC: $55,000 · HealthTIDES FOUNDATION: $286,835 · PhilanthropyLower Bottom Playaz Inc: $200,000 · Arts & CultureThe Center for Media Justice DBA MediaJustice: $100,000 · Civil RightsTransgender Law Center: $55,000 · Civil RightsLOVE NOT BLOOD CAMPAIGN: $25,000 · Civil RightsBlack Arts Movement Business District Development: $13,370 · Civil RightsWild Seed Liberation Land: $100,000 · Community ImprovementEAST BAY SANCTUARY COVENANT: $55,000 · Community Improvement
Other$2,188,251Human Services$810,000Health$310,000Philanthropy$286,835Arts & Culture$200,000Civil Rights$193,370Community Improvement$155,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAffect Real Change Inc: $400,000 over 1y, 18% of budgetTIDES FOUNDATION: $286,835 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMiss Major and Alexander L Lees TGIJP: $200,000 over 1y, 5.8% of budgetST JAMES INFIRMARY: $200,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetLower Bottom Playaz Inc: $200,000 over 1y, 34% of budgetMOMS 4 HOUSING INC: $100,000 over 1y, 34% of budgetSHELTERWOOD COLLECTIVE: $100,000 over 1y, 5.1% of budgetThe Center for Media Justice DBA MediaJustice: $100,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetWild Seed Liberation Land: $100,000 over 1y, 100% of budgetHEALTHY BLACK FAMILIES INC: $55,000 over 1y, 5.1% of budgetEAST BAY SANCTUARY COVENANT: $55,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetThe Black Organizing Project Inc: $55,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetESCAPE VELOCITY RESOURCES FOUNDATION INC: $55,000 over 1y, 30% of budgetTransgender Law Center: $55,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetUJIMA ADULT AND FAMILY SERVICES INC: $55,000 over 1y, 4.5% of budgetVoice of the Youth Inc: $55,000 over 1y, 9.1% of budgetFAM 1ST FAMILY FOUNDATION: $55,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetLOVE NOT BLOOD CAMPAIGN: $25,000 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetDIGITAL ORGANIZING POWER-BUILDING AND ENGAGEMENT LABS (DOPE LABS): $25,000 over 1y, 7.6% of budgetDestiny Arts Center: $25,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetMOTIVATING INSPIRING SUPPORTING AND SERVING SEXUALLY EXPLOITED YOUTH: $25,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetCALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY LOS ANGELES AUXILIARY SERVICES INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBlack Arts Movement Business District Development: $13,370 over 1y, 7.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

East Bay Community Fo…The San Francisco Fou…The California Endowm…Akonadi FoundationKenneth Rainin Founda…The California Wellne…Silicon Valley Commun…Amalgamated Charitabl…Borealis PhilanthropyThe James Irvine Foun…Mitchell Kapor Founda…Women's Foundation of…
East Bay Community FoundationCA33.2× affinity15 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: East Bay Community Foundation · The San Francisco Foundation · The California Endowment · Akonadi Foundation · Kenneth Rainin Foundation · The California Wellness Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc · Borealis Philanthropy · The James Irvine Foundation · Mitchell Kapor Foundation · Women's Foundation of California

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Anti Police-Terror Project Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Anti Police-Terror Project Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    04Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Anti Police-Terror Project Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Anti Police-Terror Project Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 29 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Anti Police-Terror Project’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home