Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Anthony J and Margaret D Richards Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$360k
Granted FY2025still arriving
15
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Human Services$638kInternational$557kReligion$370kEducation$200kHousing & Shelter$145kPublic Safety & Disaster$140kArts & Culture$140kAnimals$35kOther$0
02FY2025 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k12 grants · $255k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $100k
$25,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$7.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HAITI HEALTH PROMISE OF HOLY NAME$50,000
EVA'S VILLAGE$50,000
ARCHDIOCESE OF NEWARK$40,000
DISABLED AMERICAN VETERANS$30,000
FURNITURE ASSIST INC$30,000
SETON HALL UNIVERSITY$30,000
OUR LADY OF SORROWS CHURCH$25,000
COMMUNITY FOOD BANK OF NJ$25,000
SOUTH ORANGE PERFORMING ARTS CENTER$20,000
AMERICAN RED CROSS NJ REGION$15,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
FAMILY PROMISE OF ESSEX COUNTY$10,000
OASIS A HAVEN FOR WOMEN AND CHILDRE$10,000
FACES OF CHANGE$10,000
BEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY$5,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $218k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 13% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%COMMUNITY HOPE: $30k → 4%FURNITURE ASSIST INC: $50k → 10%FURNITURE ASSIST INC: $35k → 10%FURNITURE ASSIST INC: $30k → 10%FURNITURE ASSIST INC: $25k → 10%FURNITURE ASSIST INC: $20k → 10%OASIS A HAVEN FOR WOMEN AND CHILDRE: $10k → 12%OASIS A HAVEN FOR WOMEN AND CHILDRE: $8k → 12%OASIS A HAVEN FOR WOMEN AND CHILDRE: $5k → 12%OASIS A HAVEN FOR WOMEN AND CHILDRE: $5k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

NY
MA
NJ
CT
KY
MD
DC
GA

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 37% of Anthony J and Margaret D Richards Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 59% of the giving stays in NJ; read by stated purpose it is 46% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

Anthony J and Margaret D Richards Family Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 9.0% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$2.1M · 20 repeat orgs$205k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +31% since the first grant, against -22% for the ones you funded once.

20 repeat relationships — 13 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
5

Total granted

$2.1M
$165k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+31%
-22%

Still filing today

70%
60%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $40k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalHuman ServicesArts & CultureEducationCommunity ImprovementHousing & ShelterOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • EVA'S VILLAGE INC
    7× · 2018–2025 · $240k · revenue +28%
  • CF
    CRUDEM FOUNDATION INC
    6× · 2018–2025 · $217k · revenue +136%
  • SH
    SETON HALL UNIVERSITY
    6× · 2018–2025 · $175k · revenue +42%

Funded once

  • DC
    DAV CHARITABLE SERVICE TRUST
    one grant, 2023 · $85k
  • CH
    Community Hope Inc
    one grant, 2023 · $30k · revenue +18%
  • AMERICARES FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2017 · $20k · revenue -22%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

The children's hospital of philadelphia, the oldest hospital in the united states dedicated exclusively to pediatrics, strives to be the world leader in the advancement of health care for children by integrating excellent patient care,…

Health
2
Virtua Medical Group Pa

The physicians of virtua medical group (vmg) share a common philosophy in all they do: to create an outstanding experience for patients. in a broad range of specialties, from family medicine to surgery to oncology, vmg's highly-trained…

Health
3
University Associates in Obstetrics and Gynecology University Faculty Pract ice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
4
Humc Medical Observation Pa

To serve as the physician services component of a tax-exempt healthcare delivery network and to thereby promote, support & further the charitable purposes, programs & services of hmh hospitals corp.

5
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
6
Neurology Associates of Stony Brook University Faculty Practice Corp

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
7
Humc Cardiovascular Partners Pc

The organization provides high quality medical care to the community that it serves and specifically provides cardiology & related professional medical services in conjunction with hmh hospitals corp.

Health
8
Stony Brook Surgical Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
9
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
10
Stony Brook Urology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
11
Stony Brook Orthopedic Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
12
Stony Brook Ophthalmology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Catholic Medical Mission Board Inc and the most unlike its peers is Faces of Change Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/18
Grantees still filing
11/18
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

OUR LADY OF SORROWS CHURCH — $255,000 · OtherOUR LADY OF SORROWS CHURCHSETON HALL UNIVERSITY — $175,000 · OtherSETON HALL UNIVERSITYCATHOLIC RELIEF SERVICES — $125,000 · OtherCATHOLIC RELIEF SERVICESDisabled American Veterans — $125,000 · OtherDisabled American VeteransARCHDIOCESE OF NEWARK — $115,000 · OtherARCHDIOCESE OF NEWARKDAV CHARITABLE SERVICE TRUST — $85,000 · OtherDAV CHARITABLE SERVICE TRUSTHABITAT FOR HUMANITY — $40,000 · Other+7 more — $115,000 · Other+7 moreCATHOLIC MEDICAL MISSION BOARD INC — $240,000 · InternationalCATHOLIC MEDICAL MISSION BO…CRUDEM FOUNDATION INC — $217,000 · InternationalCRUDEM FOUNDATION INCMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $40,000 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES US…HOPE FOR UKRAINE INC — $40,000 · InternationalHOPE FOR UKRAINE INCAMERICARES FOUNDATION INC — $20,000 · InternationalEVA'S VILLAGE INC — $240,000 · Community ImprovementEVA'S VILLA…FURNITURE ASSIST INC — $160,000 · Human ServicesFURNITURE …Community Hope Inc — $30,000 · Human ServicesCommunity …OASIS - A HAVEN FOR WOMEN & CHILDREN INC — $27,500 · Human ServicesOASIS - A …SOUTH ORANGE PERFORMING ARTS CENTERINC — $120,000 · Arts & CultureTHE NEWARK MUSEUM ASSOCIATION — $20,000 · Arts & CultureFAMILY PROMISE OF ESSEX COUNTY INC — $55,000 · Housing & ShelterCommunity Food Bank Of New Jersey Inc — $25,000 · Food & Nutrition
Other$1,035,000International$557,000Community Improvement$240,000Human Services$217,500Arts & Culture$140,000Housing & Shelter$55,000Food & Nutrition$25,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCATHOLIC MEDICAL MISSION BOARD INC — $240,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetEVA'S VILLAGE INC — $240,000 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetCRUDEM FOUNDATION INC — $217,000 over 6y, 2.1% of budgetSETON HALL UNIVERSITY — $175,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetFURNITURE ASSIST INC — $160,000 over 5y, 14% of budgetDisabled American Veterans — $125,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTH ORANGE PERFORMING ARTS CENTERINC — $120,000 over 6y, 2.0% of budgetFAMILY PROMISE OF ESSEX COUNTY INC — $55,000 over 3y, 2.7% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $40,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHOPE FOR UKRAINE INC — $40,000 over 2y, 2.0% of budgetCommunity Hope Inc — $30,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetOASIS - A HAVEN FOR WOMEN & CHILDREN INC — $27,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetCommunity Food Bank Of New Jersey Inc — $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFACES OF CHANGE INC — $20,000 over 2y, 11% of budgetAMERICARES FOUNDATION INC — $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NEWARK MUSEUM ASSOCIATION — $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetWIKIMEDIA FOUNDATION INC — $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED NEGRO COLLEGE FUND INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CATHOLIC MEDICAL MISSION BOARD INC
  • Who funds EVA'S VILLAGE INC
  • Who funds CRUDEM FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds SETON HALL UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds FURNITURE ASSIST INC
  • Who funds Disabled American Veterans
  • Who funds SOUTH ORANGE PERFORMING ARTS CENTERINC
  • Who funds FAMILY PROMISE OF ESSEX COUNTY INC
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC
  • Who funds HOPE FOR UKRAINE INC
  • Who funds Community Hope Inc
  • Who funds OASIS - A HAVEN FOR WOMEN & CHILDREN INC
  • Who funds Community Food Bank Of New Jersey Inc
  • Who funds FACES OF CHANGE INC
  • Who funds AMERICARES FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds THE NEWARK MUSEUM ASSOCIATION
  • Who funds WIKIMEDIA FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds UNITED NEGRO COLLEGE FUND INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jpmorgan Chase FoundationNY14× affinity6 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Investors Foundation Inc · The Hyde and Watson Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Anthony J and Margaret D Richards Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 40%1%4%8%15%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 19%
  • Community Hope Inc41% of income from government
  • Family Promise of Essex County Inc33% of income from government
  • Eva's Village Inc19% of income from government
  • Seton Hall University1% of income from government
  • Americares Foundation Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph