Skip to content

· Private foundation

Anschel Eilian Family Charitable Foundation

Its FY2022 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$54k
Granted FY2022
24
Grants FY2022
9
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2022.

Education$334kPhilanthropy$91kReligion$36kArts & Culture$23kFood & Nutrition$9kScience & Tech$8kHealth$8kInternational$3kOther$0
02FY2022 · 24 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2022

  • Under $10k22 grants · $19k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $36k
$500
Median grant
9
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$25,084
JEWISH UNITED FUND$10,539
ANSHE EMET SYNAGOGUE$4,603
THE GRANT PARK ORCHESTRAL ASSOCIATI$2,500
NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF M$2,500
UNITED MASHADI JEWISH COMMNTY$1,500
ILLINOIS HOLOCAUST MUSEUM$1,000
CHICAGO CHESED FUND JOB LINK$1,000
FEED ISRAEL FOUNDATION$500
THE SURVIVOR MITZVAH PROJECT$500
THE WEITZMANN INSTITUTE$500
AMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE$500
GRACELAND UNIVERSITY$500
AMERICAN ISRAEL PUBLIC AFFAIRS COMM$500
WORLD JEWISH CONGRESS$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–21, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%SHALVA: $500 → 14%SHALVA: $500 → 14%SHALVA: $500 → 14%GLENKIRK: $500 → 14%GLENKIRK: $500 → 14%GLENKIRK: $200 → 14%CJE SENIOR LIFE: $100 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
MA
IA
OH
PA
NJ
CT
CA
CO
NE
DC
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$506k · 26 repeat orgs$11k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +46% since the first grant, against +42% for those funded once.

26 repeat relationships: 16 still active in FY2022, 10 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

26
14

Total granted

$506k
$5k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+46%
+42%

Still filing today

42%
43%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22
Arts & CultureEducationHuman ServicesPhilanthropyInternationalReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JU
    JEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO
    6× · 2017–2022 · $91k · revenue +13%
  • GP
    GRANT PARK ORCHESTRAL ASSOCIATION
    5× · 2017–2022 · $10k · revenue +127%
  • CU
    Creighton University
    3× · 2017–2020 · $2k · revenue +48%

Funded once

  • CB
    CONGREGATION BETH SHALOM
    one grant, 2021 · $750
  • AH
    AISH HATORAH
    one grant, 2021 · $540
  • CG
    CAMP GAN ISRAEL
    one grant, 2018 · $500
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Yeshiva University

The university is composed of several colleges and schools providing undergraduate, graduate, professional and post-doctoral education and training and research and clinical programs.

Education
2
The Jewish Museum

The mission of the jewish museum is to collect, preserve, exhibit and interpret art and jewish culture. see schedule o for more information.

Arts & Culture
3
Bar Ilan University in Israel Inc

Biu produces students who excel in the sciences, humanities, law, engineering, business & the arts.

—
4
Sherit Isroel
—
5
Rabbi Isaac Elchanan Theological Seminary

To prepare students for the rabbinate and to issue the traditional certificate of ordination in connection therewith. the seminary is authorized to confer the degree of master of hebrew literature (m.h.l.), doctor of hebrew literature…

Education
6
University of Judaism Foundation
—
7
Hebrew College

Promotes excellence in jewish learning & leadership within a pluralistic environment. see sch ohebrew college promotes excellence in jewish learning and leadership within a pluralistic environment of open inquiry, intellectual rigor,…

Education
8
The Jerusalem Connection
—
9
Eastern European Jewish Heritage Foundation
Philanthropy
10
The Jewish Agency for Israel

The jewish agency binds jews across ideologies and civilizations together in a worldwide jewish family with israel at its center. it provides the global framework for aliyah, ensures global jewish safety, strengthens jewish identity and…

—
11
University of Southern California Hillel Foundation

To create an informed, celebratory and satisfying jewish community for students at the university of southern california, to deepen jewish identity through social, intellectual and spiritual participation, to offer diversified…

—
12
Museum of Jewish Heritage a Living Memorial to the Holocaust

The museum of jewish heritage - a living memorial to the holocaust is new york's contribution to the global responsibility to never forget. see schedule o for additional information.

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Feed Israel Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Israel Childrens Cancer Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 49 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/21
Grantees still filing
18/21
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FRIENDS OF THE RODEPH SHALOM SCHOOL: $275,000 · OtherFRIENDS OF THE RODEPH SHALOM SCHOOLIndividual grant recipient: $51,834 · OtherIndividual grant recipientANSHE EMET SYNAGOGUE: $20,586 · Other+29 more: $53,907 · Other+29 moreJEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO: $91,039 · PhilanthropyJEWISH UNITED FUND O…+1 more: $500 · PhilanthropyGRANT PARK ORCHESTRAL ASSOCIATION: $10,328 · Arts & CultureThe United States Holocaust Memorial Museum: $500 · Arts & Culture+2 more: $730 · Arts & CultureGRACELAND UNIVERSITY: $3,350 · EducationCreighton University: $2,000 · EducationRIVERDALE COUNTRY SCHOOL INC: $500 · EducationTHE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO: $380 · EducationSHALVA INC: $1,500 · Human ServicesGlenkirk: $1,200 · Human ServicesCOUNCIL FOR JEWISH ELDERLY: $100 · Human ServicesSurvivor Mitzvah Project: $1,250 · InternationalBIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION: $500 · InternationalJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC: $500 · InternationalAMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE: $1,500 · Civil Rights
Other$401,327Philanthropy$91,539Arts & Culture$11,558Education$6,230Human Services$2,800International$2,250Civil Rights$1,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetJEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO: $91,039 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetGRANT PARK ORCHESTRAL ASSOCIATION: $10,328 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetGRACELAND UNIVERSITY: $3,350 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCreighton University: $2,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSHALVA INC: $1,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE: $1,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSurvivor Mitzvah Project: $1,250 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetGlenkirk: $1,200 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRIVERDALE COUNTRY SCHOOL INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetISRAEL CHILDRENS CANCER FOUNDATION INC: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBon Secours Mercy Health Foundation: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFEED ISRAEL FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetThe United States Holocaust Memorial Museum: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH EDUCATION IN MEDIA INC DBA JBS JEWISH BROADCASTING SERVICE: $380 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO: $380 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL YIDDISH BOOK CENTER INC: $350 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHILLEL THE FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFE: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOUNCIL FOR JEWISH ELDERLY: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds JEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO ↗
  • Who funds GRANT PARK ORCHESTRAL ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds GRACELAND UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Creighton University ↗
  • Who funds SHALVA INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE ↗
  • Who funds Survivor Mitzvah Project ↗
  • Who funds Glenkirk ↗
  • Who funds BIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds RIVERDALE COUNTRY SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC ↗
  • Who funds ISRAEL CHILDRENS CANCER FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Bon Secours Mercy Health Foundation ↗
  • Who funds FEED ISRAEL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH EDUCATION IN MEDIA INC DBA JBS JEWISH BROADCASTING SERVICE ↗
  • Who funds THE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL YIDDISH BOOK CENTER INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Communal FundNY11.8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Anschel Eilian Family Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Anschel Eilian Family Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • National Yiddish Book Center Inc: 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 49 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Anschel Eilian Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph