Skip to content
Anrol Foundation Co Edwin a Goodman at a glance

· Private foundation

Anrol Foundation Co Edwin a Goodman

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$43k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0185% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$63kPhilanthropy$50kPublic Benefit$10kRecreation & Sports$8kYouth Development$8kInternational$6kEducation$1kOther$0
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k7 grants · $13k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $30k
$2,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$47k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE MUSTIQUE CHARITABLE FOUNDATION$20,000
FREE AND FAIR LITIGATION GROUP INC$10,000
Individual grant recipient$2,500
FRIENDS OF RAYNHAM HALL$2,500
OLD WESTBURY GARDENS$2,000
HISPANIC SOCIETY OF AMERICA$2,000
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF LES ARTS FLORISSANTS$1,500
DAY ONE EARLY LEARNING COMMUNITY$1,200
PENTA MEDICAL RECYCLING CORP$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 39% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%GRAYWOLF PRESS: $1k → 11%THE MUSTIQUE CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $20k → 14%OLD WESTBURY GARDENS: $2k → 6%PRESERVATION LONG ISLAND: $2k → 7%DAY ONE EARLY LEARNING COMMUNITY: $1k → 9%FREE AND FAIR LITIGATION GROUP INC: $10k → 17%OLD WESTBURY GARDENS: $2k → 6%PRESERVATION LONG ISLAND: $2k → 7%PENTA MEDICAL RECYCLING CORP: $1k → 17%COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF OYSTER BAY: $10k → 6%PRESERVATION LONG ISLAND: $2k → 7%HISPANIC SOCIETY OF AMERICA: $2k → 17%COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF OYSTER BAY: $5k → 6%INTERNATIONAL RESCUE COMMITTEE: $3k → 17%COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF OYSTER BAY: $5k → 6%THE BATTERY CONSERVANCY: $15k → 17%COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF OYSTER BAY: $5k → 6%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF LES ARTS FLORISSANTS: $2k → 17%COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF OYSTER BAY: $5k → 6%THEODORE ROOSEVELT SANCTUARY: $3k → 6%FRIENDS OF RAYNHAM HALL: $3k → 6%THEODORE ROOSEVELT SANCTUARY: $3k → 6%FRIENDS OF RAYNHAM HALL: $3k → 6%BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF OYSTER BAY: $2k → 6%THEODORE ROOSEVELT SANCTUARY: $2k → 6%FRIENDS OF RAYNHAM HALL: $2k → 6%FRIENDS OF RAYNHAM HALL: $2k → 6%OYSTER BAY WATERFRONT CENTER: $2k → 6%OYSTER BAY WATERFRONT CENTER: $2k → 6%OYSTER BAY WATERFRONT CENTER: $2k → 6%OYSTER BAY WATERFRONT CENTER: $2k → 6%FRIENDS OF RAYNHAM HALL: $2k → 6%FRIENDS OF RAYNHAM HALL: $2k → 6%THEODORE ROOSEVELT SANCTUARY: $2k → 6%THEODORE ROOSEVELT SANCTUARY: $2k → 6%BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF OYSTER BAY: $2k → 6%BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF OYSTER BAY: $2k → 6%BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF OYSTER BAY: $2k → 6%THEODORE ROOSEVELT SANCTUARY: $2k → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

41%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$52k · 6 repeat orgs$76k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +38% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

6 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
5

Total granted

$52k
$41k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+38%
0%

Still filing today

67%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 16% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $36k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CulturePhilanthropyInternationalEducationYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TF
    THE FRIENDS OF RAYNHAM HALL INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $13k · revenue +38%
  • BG
    BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF OYSTER BAY - EAST NORWICH
    4× · 2020–2023 · $8k · revenue +94%
  • SF
    SOCIETY FOR THE PRESERVATION OF LONG ISLAND ANTIQUITIES
    3× · 2021–2023 · $6k · revenue +24%

Funded once

  • WM
    WORLD MONUMENTS FUND INCgraduated
    one grant, 2024 · $20k · revenue +38%
  • TB
    THE BATTERY CONSERVANCY INC
    one grant, 2024 · $15k · revenue 0%
  • IR
    International Rescue Committee INC
    one grant, 2024 · $3k · revenue -14%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Pierpont Morgan Library

The Morgan Library & Museum celebrates and shares the history and process of human creativity from antiquity to the present day through the preservation, study, and interpretation of a dynamic and growing collection.

Education
2
Metropolitan Museum of Art

The metropolitan museum of art collects, studies, conserves, and presents significant works of art across all times and cultures in order to connect people to creativity, knowledge, and ideas.

Arts & Culture
3
American Museum of Natural History

The museum's mission statement is: "to discover, interpret, and disseminate - through scientific research and education - knowledge about human cultures, the natural world, and the universe."

Arts & Culture
4
Solomon R Guggenheim Foundation

Committed to innovation, the solomon r. guggenheim foundation (the "foundation") collects, (continued on schedule o)

Arts & Culture
5
The Long Island Museum of American Art History & Carriages

The long island museum is dedicated to inspiring people of all ages with an understanding and enjoyment of american art, history and carriages as expressed through the heritage of long island and its diverse communities.

Arts & Culture
6
Museum of the City of New York

The museum of the city of new york fosters understanding of the distinctive nature of urban life in the world's most influential metropolis. it engages visitors by celebrating, documenting, and interpreting the city's past, present, and…

Arts & Culture
7
The Jewish Museum

The mission of the jewish museum is to collect, preserve, exhibit and interpret art and jewish culture. see schedule o for more information.

Arts & Culture
8
New York Historical Society

The founding mission of the new-york historical society ("the new york historical "tnyh") is to collect, preserve, and interpret, for the broadest possible public, material relevant to the history of the united states in general and of new…

Arts & Culture
9
The Quebec-Labrador Foundation Inc

The program mission of the quebec-labrador foundation u.s. is defined by a regional component (new england and eastern canada), and an international component, which ties our regional model to a global conservation network. qlf's program…

Philanthropy
10
Henry E Huntington Library and Art Gallery

The huntington library, art museum, and botanical gardens shares its world-renowned collections to support scholarship, foster learning, inspire creativity, and offer transformative experiences for diverse audiences.

Arts & Culture
11
Isabella Stewart Gardner Museum Inc

Organization's mission statement true to the ambitious vision of its founder and her spirit of creative risk-taking, the mission of the isabella stewart gardner museum is: - to bring to life and preserve the rich historic collection; - to…

Arts & Culture
12
The Neue Galerie New York
Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Old Westbury Gardens Inc; the most unlike its peers is International Rescue Committee Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
10/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF OYSTER BAY INC: $30,000 · PhilanthropyTHE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF OYSTER BA…The Mustique Charitable Foundation: $20,000 · PhilanthropyThe Mustique Charitable FoundationMILL REEF FUND: $2,000 · PhilanthropyIndividual grant recipient: $13,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientTHE FRIENDS OF RAYNHAM HALL INC: $13,000 · OtherTHE FRIENDS OF RAYNHAM HALL INCFREE AND FAIR LITIGATION GROUP INC: $10,000 · OtherFREE AND FAIR LITIGATION GROUP INCOYSTER BAY WATERFRONT CENTER: $8,000 · OtherOYSTER BAY WATERFRONT CENTEROld Westbury Gardens Inc: $4,000 · OtherOld Westbury Gardens IncWORLD MONUMENTS FUND INC: $20,000 · Arts & CultureWORLD MONUMENTS FUND INCTHE BATTERY CONSERVANCY INC: $15,000 · Arts & CultureTHE BATTERY CONSERVANCY INCSOCIETY FOR THE PRESERVATION OF LONG ISLAND ANTIQUITIES: $6,000 · Arts & CultureSOCIETY FOR THE PRESERVATION OF …HISPANIC SOCIETY OF AMERICA: $2,000 · Arts & Culture+2 more: $2,500 · Arts & Culture+2 moreBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF OYSTER BAY - EAST NORWICH: $8,000 · Youth DevelopmentInternational Rescue Committee INC: $2,500 · InternationalPENTA MEDICAL RECYCLING CORP: $1,000 · InternationalDAY ONE EARLY LEARNING COMMUNITY INC: $1,200 · Education
Philanthropy$52,000Other$48,000Arts & Culture$45,500Youth Development$8,000International$3,500Education$1,200

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF OYSTER BAY INC: $30,000 over 5y, 1.1% of budgetThe Mustique Charitable Foundation: $20,000 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetWORLD MONUMENTS FUND INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE BATTERY CONSERVANCY INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetTHE FRIENDS OF RAYNHAM HALL INC: $13,000 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF OYSTER BAY - EAST NORWICH: $8,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetSOCIETY FOR THE PRESERVATION OF LONG ISLAND ANTIQUITIES: $6,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetOld Westbury Gardens Inc: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetInternational Rescue Committee INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMILL REEF FUND: $2,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetHISPANIC SOCIETY OF AMERICA: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDAY ONE EARLY LEARNING COMMUNITY INC: $1,200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGRAYWOLF PRESS: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Bessemer Giving F…The Goldman Sachs Cha…Jewish Communal FundThe Bahnik Foundation…Greater Hudson Herita…The New York Communit…National Philanthropi…Vanguard Charitable E…Jpmorgan Chase Founda…Morgan Stanley Global…Paypal Charitable Giv…Fidelity Investments …
The Bessemer Giving FundNJ14.5× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Bessemer Giving Fund · The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · Jewish Communal Fund · The Bahnik Foundation Inc · Greater Hudson Heritage Network · The New York Community Trust · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Anrol Foundation Co Edwin a Goodman funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Anrol Foundation Co Edwin a Goodman. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Anrol Foundation Co Edwin a Goodman?

    Find your warmest path to Anrol Foundation Co Edwin a Goodman through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Anrol Foundation Co Edwin a Goodman’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home