Skip to content
Anne & John Tatta Family Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

Anne & John Tatta Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.7M
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$1.0M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Philanthropy$1.8MHealth$394kReligion$95kYouth Development$25kHuman Services$20kPublic Safety & Disaster$10kScience & Tech$10kRecreation & Sports$10kOther$0
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $6k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $99k
  • $250k+2 grants · $1.6M
$40,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE TATTA FAMILY GROUP DONOR ADVISED FUND$1,032,897
THE TATTA FAMILY GROUP DONOR ADVISED FUND$557,986
THE TATTA FAMILY GROUP DONOR ADVISED FUND$48,794
THE JMC FAMILY FOUNDATION$40,000
COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF OYSTER BAY$10,000
THE TATTA FAMILY GROUP DONOR ADVISED FUND$3,674
THE TATTA FAMILY GROUP DONOR ADVISED FUND$2,070
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–24, $37k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 41% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 7%CHASIN A DREAM FOUNDATION: $15k → 11%ADULTS & CHILDREN WITH LEARNING DISABILITIES: $10k → 6%ADULTS & CHILDREN WITH LEARNING DISABILITIES: $2k → 6%ISLAND HARVEST LTD: $5k → 7%SIBS PLACE INC: $5k → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
WI
NY
MA
CA
VA
MD
DC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

18%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$412k · 10 repeat orgs$1.9M to everyone else

10 repeat relationships: 0 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
20

Total granted

$412k
$242k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+33%
+39%

Still filing today

70%
60%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.7M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
PhilanthropyHealthHuman ServicesReligionInternationalScience & TechOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JM
    Jupiter Medical Center Foundation Inc
    3× · 2022–2024 · $60k · revenue +99%
  • OM
    OUR MILITARY KIDS INC
    2× · 2019–2022 · $20k · revenue +87%
  • THE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH
    2× · 2019–2020 · $15k · revenue +338%

Funded once

  • FI
    FAMILIES IN SUPPORT OF TREATMENT INC
    one grant, 2017 · $42k · revenue -97% · 56% of their budget
  • HT
    HEROES TO HEROES FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $20k · revenue +235%
  • SM
    ST MARYS HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN INC
    one grant, 2020 · $17k · revenue +24%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Long Island Jewish Medical Center

Long island jewish medical center is part of the northwell health ("northwell"), which strives to improve the health of the communities it serves and is committed to providing the highest quality clinical care; educating the current and…

Health
2
Long Island Medical Foundation Inc Dba Nuhealth Foundation

Long island medical foundation (limf) is the not-for-profit philanthropic arm of the nassau health care corporation. limf is devoted to inspire philanthropic support for the nassau university medical center, a. holly patterson skilled…

Health
3
Mjhs Hospice and Palliative Care Inc

To provide hospice services on both an inpatient and outpatient basis

Human Services
4
Candle in the Darkness Foundation Inc

Helping families with sick children.

Health
5
Christopher a Coluccio Foundation Inc

The mission of the christopher a. coluccio foundation is to celebrate and memorialize christopher's spirit, serve and educate our community, support those struggling with mental health, depression and thoughts of suicide, open lines of…

Youth Development
6
Children's Tumor Foundation

Our mission: drive research, expand knowledge, and advance care for the nf community. our vision: end nf.

Health
7
St Francis Hospital Foundation Inc

We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christ's healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities.

Health
8
Childrens Cancer Therapy Development Institute

To make all childhood cancers universally survivable by delivering new treatments to clinical trials through scientific discovery.

—
9
Staten Island University Hospital Foundation

The mission of staten island university hospital's foundation is to achieve philanthropic relationships for support and endowment, providing highest quality care, services and state of the art equipment. philanthropy has played an…

Health
10
Curesearch for Children's Cancer

Curesearch's mission is to fund & support targeted & innovative cancer research with measurable results, & to be the authoritative source of information & resources for all those affected by children's cancer. see schedule o for…

Health
11
Children's Cancer Family Foundation of Ne Wi Inc

Raise money to support families and children suffering from childhood cancer.

Health
12
Connecticut Cancer Foundation Inc

To provide funds to benefit families affected by cancer and to support cancer research and education.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Bone Marrow & Cancer Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Jmc Family Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 33 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/23
Grantees still filing
14/23
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE TATTA FAMILY GROUP DONOR ADVISED FUND: $1,645,421 · OtherTHE TATTA FAMILY GROUP DONOR ADVISED FUNDIndividual grant recipient: $85,000 · Other+14 more: $185,100 · Other+14 moreJupiter Medical Center Foundation Inc: $60,000 · PhilanthropyJupiter Med…LONG ISLAND NETWORKING ELITE INC: $45,000 · PhilanthropyLONG ISLAND…MICHAEL MAGRO FOUNDATION INC: $45,000 · PhilanthropyMICHAEL MAG…THE JMC FAMILY FOUNDATION: $40,000 · PhilanthropyTHE JMC FAM…OUR MILITARY KIDS INC: $20,000 · PhilanthropyOUR MILITAR…THE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF OYSTER BAY INC: $20,000 · PhilanthropyTHE COMMUNI…PEOPLE LOVING PEOPLE INC: $95,000 · ReligionST MARYS HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN INC: $17,000 · HealthBONE MARROW & CANCER FOUNDATION INC: $15,000 · HealthTHE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH: $15,000 · HealthCHRISTOPHERS VOICE INC: $5,000 · HealthCHASIN A DREAM FOUNDATION INC: $15,000 · Human ServicesADULTS AND CHILDREN WITH LEARNING AND DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES INC: $11,500 · Human ServicesSIBS PLACE INC: $5,000 · Human ServicesISLAND HARVEST LTD: $5,000 · Human ServicesHEROES TO HEROES FOUNDATION: $20,000 · InternationalCOLD SPRING HARBOR LABORATORY: $10,000 · Science & Tech
Other$1,915,521Philanthropy$230,000Religion$95,000Health$52,000Human Services$36,500International$20,000Science & Tech$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPEOPLE LOVING PEOPLE INC: $95,000 over 5y, 14% of budgetJupiter Medical Center Foundation Inc: $60,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetLONG ISLAND NETWORKING ELITE INC: $45,000 over 3y, 9.2% of budgetMICHAEL MAGRO FOUNDATION INC: $45,000 over 3y, 5.3% of budgetFAMILIES IN SUPPORT OF TREATMENT INC: $42,000 over 1y, 56% of budgetTHE JMC FAMILY FOUNDATION: $40,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetOUR MILITARY KIDS INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetHEROES TO HEROES FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetTHE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF OYSTER BAY INC: $20,000 over 2y, 2.3% of budgetST MARYS HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN INC: $17,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBONE MARROW & CANCER FOUNDATION INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetTHE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH: $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCHASIN A DREAM FOUNDATION INC: $15,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetADULTS AND CHILDREN WITH LEARNING AND DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES INC: $11,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLONG BEACH REACH INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCOLD SPRING HARBOR LABORATORY: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOAK NECK ATHLETIC COUNCIL INC: $10,000 over 1y, 7.4% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHUMAN UNDERSTANDING AND GROWTH SERVICES INC: $8,100 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF OYSTER BAY - EAST NORWICH: $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetSIBS PLACE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetISLAND HARVEST LTD: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Marilyn Lichtman …Jpmorgan Chase Founda…The Bank of America C…Network for GoodNational Philanthropi…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
The Marilyn Lichtman FoundationNY13.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Marilyn Lichtman Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Network for Good · National Philanthropic Trust · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Anne & John Tatta Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Anne & John Tatta Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Heroes to Heroes Foundation: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Anne & John Tatta Family Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Anne & John Tatta Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 33 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Anne & John Tatta Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home