· Private foundation
Anne & Jacob Starr Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k26 grants · $54k
- $10k–50k16 grants · $200k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| MOUNT SINAI VISITING DOCTORS PROGRA | $25,000 |
| AMERICANS FOR BEN-GURION | $20,000 |
| HAWAIIAN ISLANDS LANDS TRUST | $20,000 |
| NEW YORK PUBLIC LIBRARY | $15,000 |
| COMPTETIVE ENTERPRISE INSTITUTE | $10,000 |
| CAMERA | $10,000 |
| US-CUMBERLAND COLLEGE | $10,000 |
| AMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE HEBREW UNIV | $10,000 |
| HILLSDALE COLLEGE | $10,000 |
| ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSIPTI | $10,000 |
| KAUPO COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION | $10,000 |
| FRIENDS OF ISRAELI DEFENSE FORCES | $10,000 |
| DOLLYWOOD FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| NEW YORK CIVIL RIGHTS COALITION | $10,000 |
| AMERICAN TECHNION SOCIETY | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $47k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 98% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +38% since the first grant, against +18% for the ones you funded once.
65 repeat relationships — 34 still active in FY2025, 31 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 80% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $49k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TRTHE REASON FOUNDATION5× · 2020–2025 · $46k · revenue +41%
- HIHAWAIIAN ISLANDS LAND TRUST3× · 2020–2025 · $31k · revenue +250%
- CFCOMMITTEE FOR ACCURACY IN MIDDLE EAST REPORTING IN AMERICA INC6× · 2020–2025 · $30k · revenue +33%
Funded once
- AFAMERICANS FOR BEN-GURION UNIVERSITY INCgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $20k · revenue +31%
- BFBrothers for Lifeone grant, 2024 · $10k · revenue 0%
- TSTHE SILVER SHIELD FOUNDATION INCgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $5k · revenue +73%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The open markets institute works to help people relearn how to use competition policy to build stronger democracies, more just and equitable societies, more innovative and sustainable economies, and a more secure and peaceful world.
Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.
The museum's mission statement is: "to discover, interpret, and disseminate - through scientific research and education - knowledge about human cultures, the natural world, and the universe."
Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.
The peterson institute for international economics (piie) is an independent nonprofit, nonpartisan research organization dedicated to strengthening prosperity and human welfare in the global economy through expert analysis and practical…
Wwf's mission is to conserve nature and reduce the most pressing threats to the diversity of life on earth. (continued on schedule o)
Founded in 1877, american humane association, dba american humane society (american humane) is committed to ensuring the safety, welfare and well-being of animals. our leadership programs are first to serve in promoting and nurturing the…
Rainforest trust saves endangered wildlife and protects our planet by creating rainforest reserves through partnerships, community engagement, and donor support.
To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.
Biu produces students who excel in the sciences, humanities, law, engineering, business & the arts.
To address, educate, coordinate, and enhance enforcement capacity to end teh trade in coral reef wildlife for household and other small display aquariums. our supply and demand side strategies are directed locally and globally to…
The foreign policy research institute (frpi) is dedicated to producing the highest quality scholarship and nonpartisan policy analysis focused on crucial foreign policy and national security challenges facing the united states. we educate…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Human Rights Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is Stuttering Foundation of America. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 30 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 3% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
80 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 80 of the 120 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds THE REASON FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds HAWAIIAN ISLANDS LAND TRUST ↗
- Who funds COMMITTEE FOR ACCURACY IN MIDDLE EAST REPORTING IN AMERICA INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF HEBREW UNIVERSITY INC ↗
- Who funds HILLSDALE COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds MIDDLE EAST MEDIA AND RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICANS FOR BEN-GURION UNIVERSITY INC ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES ↗
- Who funds PS 130-M PARENT'S ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds Freedom Guide Dogs for the Blind Inc ↗
- Who funds The New York Public Library Astor Lenox and Tilden Foundations ↗
- Who funds ENCORE COMMUNITY SERVICES ↗
- Who funds New York Civil Rights Coalition Inc ↗
- Who funds MAP International Inc ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN SIGN MUSEUM ↗
- Who funds INSTITUTE FOR JUSTICE ↗
- Who funds HIMALAYAN CATARACT PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN FREEDOM DEFENSE INITIATIVE ↗
- Who funds Grant Monument Association Inc ↗
- Who funds Brothers for Life ↗
- Who funds KAUPO COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds COMPETITIVE ENTERPRISE INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds THE DOLLYWOOD FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE CAJUN NAVY RELIEF INC ↗
- Who funds BETH-HARK CHRISTIAN COUNSELING CENTER ↗
- Who funds CENTER FOR INDEPENDENT THOUGHT ↗
- Who funds HAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds HAWAII UNITES ↗
- Who funds GRASSROOT INSTITUTE OF HAWAII INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Donors Trust Inc · Atlas Economic Research Foundation · Bradley Impact Fund Inc · The Tapestry Foundation Inc · The Red Cabin Foundation Trust · Garvey Kansas Foundation · Adolph Coors Foundation · Atherton Family Foundation · Jewish Communal Fund · The Yelp Foundation · The New York Community Trust · Greater Houston Community Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Anne & Jacob Starr Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.