· Private foundation
Ann M & Robert M Holder Foundation
Its FY2022 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2022.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2022
- Under $10k24 grants · $45k
- $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
- $250k+1 grant · $507k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| BUCKHEAD CHRISTIAN MINISTRY | $507,225 |
| SCGA JUNIOR GOLF FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| ALL SAINTS EPISCOPAL CHURCH | $5,500 |
| CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF LA | $5,000 |
| ST SIMONS LAND TRUST | $5,000 |
| SHELTERING ARMS | $5,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $5,000 |
| CODY'S FRIENDS RESCUE | $4,500 |
| ATLANTA HISTORY CENTER | $1,750 |
| CSH MEMORIAL ART FUND | $1,000 |
| CHOA | $1,000 |
| UT HEALTH SAN ANTONIO | $1,000 |
| CITY OF REFUGE | $1,000 |
| WELLSPRING LIVING | $1,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $1,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–21, $4k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +63% since the first grant, against +40% for the ones you funded once.
28 repeat relationships — 12 still active in FY2022, 16 since wound down; 14 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2022, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $33k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- BCBUCKHEAD CHRISTIAN MINISTRY INC6× · 2017–2022 · $544k · revenue +90%
- RVRAINBOW VILLAGE INC2× · 2018–2019 · $20k · revenue +353%
- TSTHE SHELTERING ARMS INC2× · 2019–2022 · $10k · revenue +7%
Funded once
- TSTHE SCGA FOUNDATIONgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $9k · revenue +101%
- JCJOHNSON C SMITH THEOL SEMone grant, 2018 · $8k
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2019 · $5k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To make kids better today and healthier tomorrow.
Sof is called to empower warriors to find purpose, be resilient, and live well. we develop and provide customized treatment plans for veterans through our national network of partners.
To serve our communities by provding innovative and compassionate healthcare.
To improve the quality of life for the diverse communities we serve providing affordable and comprehensive healthcare and education in a welcoming multi-cultural environment.
To eliminate disparities in health care access and outcomes by providing superior quality health and human services through an integrated world-class delivery system for latino, multi-ethnic underserved communities in southern california.
We, saint joseph's health system and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities. honoring the heritage and advancing the ministry of the sisters of…
To provide exceptional healthcare services in a safe and trustful environment through the expertise, committment, and compassion of our family of caregivers.
Dedicated to improving the quality of life and increasing the self sufficiency of individuals with emotional, social and economic barriers. this is accomplished by providing direct support and assistance needed to enable individuals to…
People inc. provides health and human services that enrich lives and communities through innovation and supportive services. with a goal to help people achieve greater independence and quality of life, people inc. provides day,…
To improve, maintain and restore the health of the people in the communities we serve.
Our mission is to break the cycle of addiction and trauma for women, children, and families.
We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christ's healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Shepherd Center Inc and the most unlike its peers is Meals On Wheels. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 35 years old; the field is 11. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 28% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 19% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
48 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 48 of the 93 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds BUCKHEAD CHRISTIAN MINISTRY INC ↗
- Who funds RAINBOW VILLAGE INC ↗
- Who funds THE SHELTERING ARMS INC ↗
- Who funds YOUNG & HEALTHY ↗
- Who funds THE SCGA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds FORWARD ARTS FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds ATLANTA COMMUNITY FOOD BANK INC ↗
- Who funds THE CARTER CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds Children's Hospital Los Angeles ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF REFUGEES INC ↗
- Who funds ST SIMONS LAND TRUST INC ↗
- Who funds OCEANA INC ↗
- Who funds THOMASVILLE ANTIQUES SHOW FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds CODYS FRIENDS RESCUE ↗
- Who funds ATLANTA HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
- Who funds PATH FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds TRINITY COMMUNITY MINISTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds SONG FOR CHARLIE INC ↗
- Who funds CLARKE COUNTY MENTOR PROGRAM INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Community Foundation for Greater Atlanta Inc · Georgia Power Foundation Inc · Williams Family Foundation of Georgia Inc · Frances Wood Wilson Foundation Inc · Tuw Thomas H Pitts · The Sartain Lanier Family Foundation Inc · The Scott Hudgens Family Foundation Inc · The Imlay Foundation Inc · United Way of Greater Atlanta Inc · Mightycause Charitable Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · National Philanthropic Trust
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Ann M & Robert M Holder Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Wounded Warrior Project Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.