Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Ann & Bill Brine Family Foundation

Its FY2022 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$35k
Granted FY2020
22
Grants FY2020
7
States reached
$15k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

88% of Ann & Bill Brine Family Foundation’s FY2022 grant dollars went to Martha'S Vineyard Community Foundation Inc, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2022 names 6 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2020, the last year Ann & Bill Brine Family Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 13 organizations, $35k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

18
17
4
18
7
19
13
20
10
21
6
22

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What you fund
0191% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172022.

Philanthropy$330kEducation$100kHuman Services$32kEnvironment$18kHousing & Shelter$4kHealth$4kReligion$3kArts & Culture$3kOther$0
02FY2020 · 22 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2020

  • Under $10k21 grants · $20k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $15k
$500
Median grant
7
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PORTSMOUTH ABBEY SCHOOL$15,000
CHAPPAQUIDDICK COMMUNITY CENTER$8,750
SHERIFF'S MEADOW FOUNDATION$3,750
DISMAS HOUSE$1,000
THE FAMILY PLACE$1,000
MARTHA'S VINEYARD MEDIATION PROGRAM$600
Individual grant recipient$500
GOOD NEIGHBOR HEALTH CLINICS$500
COVER$500
WILLING HANDS ENTERPRISES$500
CATHOLIC CHARITIES - NEW HAMPSHIRE$500
MARTHA'S VINEYARD HOSPITAL INFUSION CLINIC$350
FRIENDS OF THE EDGARTOWN COUNCIL ON AGING$300
FEATHERSTONE CENTER FOR THE ARTS$250
MANHATTANVILLE COLLEGE$250
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–21, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%LISTEN: $500 → 10%WILLING HANDS ENTERPRISES: $500 → 10%CATHOLIC CHARITIES - NEW HAMPSHIRE: $500 → 10%WILLING HANDS ENTERPRISES: $350 → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

VT
NH
NY
MA
OR
RI
MD
DC
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$158k · 24 repeat orgs$14k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +67% since the first grant, against +33% for the ones you funded once.

24 repeat relationships — 16 still active in FY2020, 8 since wound down; 13 grantees were first funded in FY2020 (too recent to call). Read against FY2020, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

24
21

Total granted

$158k
$8k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+67%
+33%

Still filing today

50%
52%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22
Arts & CultureHealthEnvironmentEducationHuman ServicesRecreation & SportsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CC
    CHAPPAQUIDDICK COMMUNITY CENTER
    6× · 2017–2022 · $26k · revenue +78%
  • SM
    SHERIFF'S MEADOW FOUNDATION
    6× · 2017–2022 · $17k · revenue +311%
  • MV
    MARTHA'S VINEYARD MEDIATION PROGRAM INC
    3× · 2019–2021 · $2k · revenue +485%

Funded once

  • SS
    ST SEBASTIANS SCHOOL INC
    one grant, 2018 · $1k
  • CS
    CANTERBURY SCHOOL INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $1k · revenue +82%
  • FR
    FAMILY REACH FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $1k · revenue +98%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
2
Saint Anselm College

Saint anselm is a catholic, benedictine college providing all of its students a distinctive liberal arts education that incorporates opportunities for professional and career preparation. it does so in a learning community that encourages…

Education
3
Native Plant Trust Inc

The organization's mission is to conserve and promote new england's native plants to ensure healthy, biologically diverse landscapes.

Environment
4
Bartlett Arboretum Association Inc

To cultivate and develop an expansive collection of trees, gardens, and plants for all to explore, enjoy and study; and to provide through education and stewardship, a greener, healthier, more beautiful environment.

Environment
5
Nantucket Conservation Foundation Inc

The nantucket conservation foundation owns, protects, and stewards over 9,000 acres of land and coastal shoreline, conserves nantucket's rare and significant natural resources, and engages in impactful ecological research to inform…

Environment
6
Northeast College of Health Sciences

Northeast college of health sciences (the college) is committed to academic excellence, leadership, and professional best practices in the health sciences.

Education
7
Harvard Conservation Trust

To preserve the unique character and natural resources of harvard.

Environment
8
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

9
Champlain Valley Physicians Hospital Medical Center

Cvph medical center's mission is to provide quality health care for the north country region in upstate new york.

Health
10
Mount Desert Land and Garden Preserve

The mission of the mount desert land & garden preserve is to conserve and share the beauty of our historic lands and gardens.

11
Martha's Vineyard Agricultural Society Inc

The martha's vineyard agricultural society supports a resilient and sustainable agricultural community on martha's vineyard. we do this by:- offering services, education, marketing, and technical support for farmers and farmworkers on the…

Recreation & Sports
12
Mcphs University

Mcphs university prepares students for careers in health care through teaching, scholarship, research, professional service and community engagement.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Sheriff's Meadow Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyChild and Family ServicesCommunity Health CentersFood Pantries & AssistanceGovernment Accountability R…Christian Missionary Organi…Public Library SupportCommunity Arts OrganizationsCancer Support OrganizationsIndependent K-8 SchoolsFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Land Conservation Organizat…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 45 years old; the field is 17. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number20%0%<5yr14%6%5–10yr20%6%10–20yr19%21%20–35yr14%27%35–55yr14%41%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value20%0%<5yr14%84%5–10yr20%0%10–20yr19%1%20–35yr14%8%35–55yr14%7%55yr+

The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/35
the rest of the field
11%
4,714/42,323

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

30 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 30 of the 59 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
30/30
Grantees still filing
26/30
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

MARTHA'S VINEYARD COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC — $330,147 · PhilanthropyMARTHA'S VINEYARD COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INCPORTSMOUTH ABBEY SCHOOL — $89,903 · OtherPORTSMOUTH ABBEY SCHOOLDISMAS HOUSE — $4,000 · Other+39 more — $22,377 · Other+39 moreCHAPPAQUIDDICK COMMUNITY CENTER — $26,050 · Recreation & SportsSHERIFF'S MEADOW FOUNDATION — $17,254 · Environment+3 more — $600 · EnvironmentMANHATTANVILLE UNIVERSITY — $4,750 · EducationCANTERBURY SCHOOL INC — $1,000 · EducationCAMBRIDGE COLLEGE INC — $1,000 · Education+1 more — $200 · EducationGood Neighbor Health Clinic Inc — $1,000 · HealthFAMILY REACH FOUNDATION — $1,000 · HealthPARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION — $500 · HealthALZHEIMER'S DISEASE AND RELATED DISORDERS NEW YORK CITY INC — $250 · HealthAmerican Heart Association Inc — $200 · HealthWILLING HANDS ENTERPRISES INC — $850 · Human ServicesNew Hampshire Catholic Charities — $500 · Human ServicesLISTEN Lebanon in Service to Each Neighbor — $500 · Human Services
Philanthropy$330,147Other$116,280Recreation & Sports$26,050Environment$17,854Education$6,950Health$2,950Human Services$1,850

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetMARTHA'S VINEYARD COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC — $330,147 over 2y, 5.5% of budgetCHAPPAQUIDDICK COMMUNITY CENTER — $26,050 over 6y, 8.3% of budgetSHERIFF'S MEADOW FOUNDATION — $17,254 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetMANHATTANVILLE UNIVERSITY — $4,750 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMARTHA'S VINEYARD MEDIATION PROGRAM INC — $1,600 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetTHE FAMILY PLACE INC — $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNavigator Homes of Marthas Vineyard — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGood Neighbor Health Clinic Inc — $1,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCANTERBURY SCHOOL INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCAMBRIDGE COLLEGE INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFAMILY REACH FOUNDATION — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWILLING HANDS ENTERPRISES INC — $850 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMARTHA'S VINEYARD MUSEUM INC — $650 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNew Hampshire Catholic Charities — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLISTEN Lebanon in Service to Each Neighbor — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION — $500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUPPER VALLEY HAVEN — $350 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPOLLY HILL ARBORETUM INC — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE GROUNDTRUTH PROJECT INC — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUPPER VALLEY LAND TRUST INC — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE AND RELATED DISORDERS NEW YORK CITY INC — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFEATHERSTONE CENTER FOR THE ARTS INC — $250 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSALVADOR DALI MUSEUM INC — $240 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTRUSTEES OF THE COLLEGE OF THE HOLY CROSS — $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFLORIDA WEST COAST PUBLIC BROADCASTING INC — $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc — $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHANOVER CONSERVANCY — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALBERT WHITTED AIRPORT PRESERVATION — $70 over 2y, 0.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MARTHA'S VINEYARD COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds CHAPPAQUIDDICK COMMUNITY CENTER
  • Who funds SHERIFF'S MEADOW FOUNDATION
  • Who funds MANHATTANVILLE UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds MARTHA'S VINEYARD MEDIATION PROGRAM INC
  • Who funds THE FAMILY PLACE INC
  • Who funds Navigator Homes of Marthas Vineyard
  • Who funds Good Neighbor Health Clinic Inc
  • Who funds CANTERBURY SCHOOL INC
  • Who funds CAMBRIDGE COLLEGE INC
  • Who funds FAMILY REACH FOUNDATION
  • Who funds WILLING HANDS ENTERPRISES INC
  • Who funds MARTHA'S VINEYARD MUSEUM INC
  • Who funds New Hampshire Catholic Charities
  • Who funds LISTEN Lebanon in Service to Each Neighbor
  • Who funds PARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION
  • Who funds UPPER VALLEY HAVEN
  • Who funds POLLY HILL ARBORETUM INC
  • Who funds THE GROUNDTRUTH PROJECT INC
  • Who funds UPPER VALLEY LAND TRUST INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Emily Landecker Foundation IncNH19.9× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Emily Landecker Foundation Inc · New Hampshire Charitable Foundation · The Couch Family Foundation · Flora R and Isidor M Stettenheim Foundation Inc · Schon Family Foundation · Mascoma Bank Foundation · The Vermont Community Foundation · Lubbe Family Foundation · Robert Miller & Catherine Miller Charitable Foundation · The Help for People Foundation · Barrette Family Fund · Frank and Brinna Sands Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Ann & Bill Brine Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 80%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 28%
  • Martha's Vineyard Mediation Program Inc71% of income from government
  • The Family Place Inc38% of income from government
  • Upper Valley Haven38% of income from government
  • Martha's Vineyard Community Foundation Inc34% of income from government
  • Navigator Homes of Marthas Vineyard28% of income from government
  • Willing Hands Enterprises Inc17% of income from government
  • Sheriff's Meadow Foundation2% of income from government
  • Cambridge College Inc1% of income from government
  • Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
8get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 59 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2020, released 2020. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph