Skip to content

· Private foundation

Ann & Bill Brine Family Foundation

Its FY2022 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$35k
Granted FY2020
22
Grants FY2020
7
States reached
$15k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

88% of Ann & Bill Brine Family Foundation’s FY2022 grant dollars went to Martha'S Vineyard Community Foundation Inc, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2022 names 6 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2020, the last year Ann & Bill Brine Family Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 13 organizations, $35k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

18
’17
4
’18
7
’19
13
’20
10
’21
6
’22

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
0191% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2022.

Philanthropy$330kEducation$100kHuman Services$32kEnvironment$18kHousing & Shelter$4kHealth$4kReligion$3kArts & Culture$3kOther$0
02FY2020 · 22 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2020

  • Under $10k21 grants · $20k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $15k
$500
Median grant
7
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PORTSMOUTH ABBEY SCHOOL$15,000
CHAPPAQUIDDICK COMMUNITY CENTER$8,750
SHERIFF'S MEADOW FOUNDATION$3,750
THE FAMILY PLACE$1,000
DISMAS HOUSE$1,000
MARTHA'S VINEYARD MEDIATION PROGRAM$600
CATHOLIC CHARITIES - NEW HAMPSHIRE$500
GOOD NEIGHBOR HEALTH CLINICS$500
COVER$500
WILLING HANDS ENTERPRISES$500
Individual grant recipient$500
MARTHA'S VINEYARD HOSPITAL INFUSION CLINIC$350
FRIENDS OF THE EDGARTOWN COUNCIL ON AGING$300
HEART OF ALZHEIMER'S CAREGIVING$250
CATHOLIC RELIEF SERVICES$250
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–21, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%CATHOLIC CHARITIES - NEW HAMPSHIRE: $500 → 10%WILLING HANDS ENTERPRISES: $500 → 10%LISTEN: $500 → 10%WILLING HANDS ENTERPRISES: $350 → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

VT
NH
NY
MA
OR
RI
MD
DC
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$158k · 24 repeat orgs$14k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +67% since the first grant, against +33% for those funded once.

24 repeat relationships: 16 still active in FY2020, 8 since wound down; 13 grantees were first funded in FY2020 (too recent to call). Read against FY2020, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

24
21

Total granted

$158k
$8k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+67%
+33%

Still filing today

50%
52%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22
Arts & CultureHealthEnvironmentEducationHuman ServicesRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CC
    CHAPPAQUIDDICK COMMUNITY CENTER
    6× · 2017–2022 · $26k · revenue +78%
  • SM
    SHERIFF'S MEADOW FOUNDATION
    6× · 2017–2022 · $17k · revenue +311%
  • MV
    MARTHA'S VINEYARD MEDIATION PROGRAM INC
    3× · 2019–2021 · $2k · revenue +485%

Funded once

  • CS
    CANTERBURY SCHOOL INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $1k · revenue +82%
  • FR
    FAMILY REACH FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $1k · revenue +98%
  • SS
    ST SEBASTIANS SCHOOL INC
    one grant, 2018 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
2
Saint Anselm College

Saint anselm is a catholic, benedictine college providing all of its students a distinctive liberal arts education that incorporates opportunities for professional and career preparation. it does so in a learning community that encourages…

Education
3
Native Plant Trust Inc

The organization's mission is to conserve and promote new england's native plants to ensure healthy, biologically diverse landscapes.

Environment
4
Bartlett Arboretum Association Inc

To cultivate and develop an expansive collection of trees, gardens, and plants for all to explore, enjoy and study; and to provide through education and stewardship, a greener, healthier, more beautiful environment.

Environment
5
Nantucket Conservation Foundation Inc

The nantucket conservation foundation owns, protects, and stewards over 9,000 acres of land and coastal shoreline, conserves nantucket's rare and significant natural resources, and engages in impactful ecological research to inform…

Environment
6
Northeast College of Health Sciences

Northeast college of health sciences (the college) is committed to academic excellence, leadership, and professional best practices in the health sciences.

Education
7
Harvard Conservation Trust

To preserve the unique character and natural resources of harvard.

Environment
8
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
9
Champlain Valley Physicians Hospital Medical Center

Cvph medical center's mission is to provide quality health care for the north country region in upstate new york.

Health
10
Mount Desert Land and Garden Preserve

The mission of the mount desert land & garden preserve is to conserve and share the beauty of our historic lands and gardens.

—
11
Martha's Vineyard Agricultural Society Inc

The martha's vineyard agricultural society supports a resilient and sustainable agricultural community on martha's vineyard. we do this by:- offering services, education, marketing, and technical support for farmers and farmworkers on the…

Recreation & Sports
12
Mcphs University

Mcphs university prepares students for careers in health care through teaching, scholarship, research, professional service and community engagement.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Sheriff's Meadow Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

30 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 30 of the 59 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
30/30
Grantees still filing
26/30
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MARTHA'S VINEYARD COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $330,147 · PhilanthropyMARTHA'S VINEYARD COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INCPORTSMOUTH ABBEY SCHOOL: $89,903 · OtherPORTSMOUTH ABBEY SCHOOLDISMAS HOUSE: $4,000 · Other+39 more: $22,377 · Other+39 moreCHAPPAQUIDDICK COMMUNITY CENTER: $26,050 · Recreation & SportsSHERIFF'S MEADOW FOUNDATION: $17,254 · Environment+3 more: $600 · EnvironmentMANHATTANVILLE UNIVERSITY: $4,750 · EducationCANTERBURY SCHOOL INC: $1,000 · EducationCAMBRIDGE COLLEGE INC: $1,000 · Education+1 more: $200 · EducationGood Neighbor Health Clinic Inc: $1,000 · HealthFAMILY REACH FOUNDATION: $1,000 · HealthPARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $500 · HealthALZHEIMER'S DISEASE AND RELATED DISORDERS NEW YORK CITY INC: $250 · HealthAmerican Heart Association Inc: $200 · HealthWILLING HANDS ENTERPRISES INC: $850 · Human ServicesNew Hampshire Catholic Charities: $500 · Human ServicesLISTEN Lebanon in Service to Each Neighbor: $500 · Human Services
Philanthropy$330,147Other$116,280Recreation & Sports$26,050Environment$17,854Education$6,950Health$2,950Human Services$1,850

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMARTHA'S VINEYARD COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $330,147 over 2y, 5.5% of budgetCHAPPAQUIDDICK COMMUNITY CENTER: $26,050 over 6y, 8.3% of budgetSHERIFF'S MEADOW FOUNDATION: $17,254 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetMANHATTANVILLE UNIVERSITY: $4,750 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMARTHA'S VINEYARD MEDIATION PROGRAM INC: $1,600 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetTHE FAMILY PLACE INC: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNavigator Homes of Marthas Vineyard: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGood Neighbor Health Clinic Inc: $1,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCANTERBURY SCHOOL INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCAMBRIDGE COLLEGE INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFAMILY REACH FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWILLING HANDS ENTERPRISES INC: $850 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMARTHA'S VINEYARD MUSEUM INC: $650 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNew Hampshire Catholic Charities: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLISTEN Lebanon in Service to Each Neighbor: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUPPER VALLEY HAVEN: $350 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE AND RELATED DISORDERS NEW YORK CITY INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUPPER VALLEY LAND TRUST INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFEATHERSTONE CENTER FOR THE ARTS INC: $250 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE GROUNDTRUTH PROJECT INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPOLLY HILL ARBORETUM INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSALVADOR DALI MUSEUM INC: $240 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTRUSTEES OF THE COLLEGE OF THE HOLY CROSS: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFLORIDA WEST COAST PUBLIC BROADCASTING INC: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHANOVER CONSERVANCY: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALBERT WHITTED AIRPORT PRESERVATION: $70 over 2y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MARTHA'S VINEYARD COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds CHAPPAQUIDDICK COMMUNITY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds SHERIFF'S MEADOW FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MANHATTANVILLE UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds MARTHA'S VINEYARD MEDIATION PROGRAM INC ↗
  • Who funds THE FAMILY PLACE INC ↗
  • Who funds Navigator Homes of Marthas Vineyard ↗
  • Who funds Good Neighbor Health Clinic Inc ↗
  • Who funds CANTERBURY SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds CAMBRIDGE COLLEGE INC ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY REACH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds WILLING HANDS ENTERPRISES INC ↗
  • Who funds MARTHA'S VINEYARD MUSEUM INC ↗
  • Who funds New Hampshire Catholic Charities ↗
  • Who funds PARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds LISTEN Lebanon in Service to Each Neighbor ↗
  • Who funds UPPER VALLEY HAVEN ↗
  • Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE AND RELATED DISORDERS NEW YORK CITY INC ↗
  • Who funds UPPER VALLEY LAND TRUST INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Emily Landecker Foundation IncNH19.9× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Emily Landecker Foundation Inc · New Hampshire Charitable Foundation · The Couch Family Foundation · Flora R and Isidor M Stettenheim Foundation Inc · Schon Family Foundation · Mascoma Bank Foundation · The Vermont Community Foundation · Lubbe Family Foundation · Robert Miller & Catherine Miller Charitable Foundation · The Help for People Foundation · Barrette Family Fund · Frank and Brinna Sands Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Ann & Bill Brine Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Ann & Bill Brine Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 80%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 28%
  • Martha's Vineyard Mediation Program Inc: 71% of income from government
  • The Family Place Inc: 38% of income from government
  • Upper Valley Haven: 38% of income from government
  • Martha's Vineyard Community Foundation Inc: 34% of income from government
  • Navigator Homes of Marthas Vineyard: 28% of income from government
  • Willing Hands Enterprises Inc: 17% of income from government
  • Sheriff's Meadow Foundation: 2% of income from government
  • Cambridge College Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
8get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 59 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2020, released 2020. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Ann & Bill Brine Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph