Skip to content

· Private foundation

Anheuser-Busch Foundation Xxx-Xx-Xxxx

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$7.3M
Granted FY2023
112
Grants FY2023
24
States reached
$750k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Philanthropy$6.2MPublic Safety & Disaster$4.4MEducation$3.9MEnvironment$2.8MCommunity Improvement$2.1MHealth$1.9MCivil Rights$1.3MArts & Culture$1.0MOther$0
02FY2023 · 112 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 112 grants below total $6,710,508, the rows itemized in this filing. The $7,337,008 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $626,500 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2023

  • Under $10k38 grants · $98k
  • $10k–50k32 grants · $691k
  • $50k–250k37 grants · $3.6M
  • $250k+5 grants · $2.4M
$20,000
Median grant
24
States reached
$1.2M
Total assets

Largely a single collection: about 96% of reported assets are 9970065m9 Land 860 Acres Hwy 2.

Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Mothers Against Drunk Driving$750,000
American National Red Cross$500,000
United Way of Greater St. Louis Inc.$500,000
Hispanic Scholarship Fund$300,000
Keep America Beautiful Inc.$300,000
American Online Giving Foundation Inc.$235,434
American Online Giving Foundation Inc.$204,386
Medal of Honor Museum Foundation$200,000
National Volunteer Fire Council Inc.$200,000
Together for Safer Roads Inc.$150,000
American Online Giving Foundation Inc.$135,589
Urban League of Metropolitan St. Louis$135,000
United States Hispanic Chamber of Commerce Educational Fund$125,000
National Urban League Inc.$125,000
Greater St. Louis Inc. Foundation$125,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–20, $1.1M) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 2% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%NATIONAL CENTER FOR VICTIMS OF CRIME: $100k → 7%MID VALLEY FAMILY YMCA: $10k → 14%ERIE NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE: $10k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $1.0M → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NH
WA
ID
MT
ND
IL
MI
NY
MA
OR
IN
OH
NJ
CT
CA
CO
MO
WV
VA
MD
KS
NC
SC
DC
HI
LA
MS
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

78%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$19M · 94 repeat orgs$5.3M to everyone else

94 repeat relationships: 53 still active in FY2023, 41 since wound down; 38 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

94
163

Total granted

$19M
$4.6M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+26%
+29%

Still filing today

74%
45%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $641k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23
EducationEnvironmentArts & CulturePhilanthropyHuman ServicesPublic Safety & DisasterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AN
    American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches
    3× · 2020–2023 · $2.5M · revenue +38%
  • HS
    HISPANIC SCHOLARSHIP FUND
    4× · 2020–2023 · $1.2M · revenue +133%
  • KA
    KEEP AMERICA BEAUTIFUL INC
    3× · 2020–2023 · $925k · revenue +14%

Funded once

  • MA
    MOTHERS AGAINST DRUNK DRIVING
    one grant, 2021 · $750k · revenue +4%
  • RIVER NETWORKgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $300k · revenue +136%
  • UO
    University of Idaho
    one grant, 2021 · $200k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
2
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
3
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
4
National Association of College and University Attorneys

To advance the practice of higher education attorneys for the benefit of the institutions they serve.

—
5
Augustana College

Rooted in the liberal arts & sciences & lutheran expression of the christian faith, & is committed to offering a challenging education that develops qualities of mind, spirit, & body necessary for a rewarding life of leadership & service…

Education
6
Columbia College

Columbia college improves lives by providing quality education to both traditional and nontraditional students, helping them achieve their true potential.

Education
7
Missouri Western State University Foundation Inc

The missouri western state university foundation is a not-for-profit charitable organization that functions solely to support the mission of missouri western state university, as stated in the university's mission statement. the foundation…

—
8
University of Virginia Foundation

To provide administrative services to university of virginia (university) entities, university associated organizations, or other entities involved in activities which support the university. to engage in matters pertaining to real…

Education
9
University of Virginia Investment Management Company

The university of virginia investment management company (uvimco) is organized to invest funds on behalf of the rector and visitors of the university of virginia (the university or uva) and university-associated organizations (uaos).

Education
10
The George Washington University

The mission of the george washington university (gw) is to educate individuals in liberal arts, languages, sciences, learned professions, and other courses and subjects of study, and to conduct scholarly research and publish the findings…

Education
11
Aacsb International - the Association to Advance Collegiate Schools of Business

Aacsb international provides quality assurance of business school programs, the latest in business education intelligence, thought leadership, and learning and development services.

Education
12
American Gas Association

American gas association's (the association) mission is to develop and advocate for informed, innovative, and durable policy that fulfills our nation's energy needs, environmental aspirations and economic potential. we are committed to…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is University of Arkansas Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is We Are All Human Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

182 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 182 of the 301 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

6
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
28
Early backer (in before they grew)
179/182
Grantees still filing
126/182
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Mothers Against Drunk Driving: $1,500,000 · OtherMothers Against Drunk DrivingNational Volunteer Fire Council Inc: $855,000 · OtherNational Volunteer Fire Council IncURBAN LEAGUE OF METROPOLITAN ST LOUIS: $605,000 · OtherURBAN LEAGUE OF METROPOLITAN ST LOUISTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $600,000 · OtherTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY+132 more: $7,434,305 · Other+132 moreUNITED WAY OF GREATER ST LOUIS INC: $3,157,343 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF GREATER ST …AMERICAN ONLINE GIVING FOUNDATION INC: $2,528,564 · PhilanthropyAMERICAN ONLINE GIVING FO…NEW YORK CARES INC: $300,000 · Philanthropy+5 more: $144,000 · PhilanthropyHISPANIC SCHOLARSHIP FUND: $1,200,000 · EducationHISPANIC SCHOL…UNITED NEGRO COLLEGE FUND INC: $600,000 · EducationUNITED NEGRO C…U S Black Chamber of Commerce EDC: $300,000 · EducationU S Black Cham…UNITED STATES HISPANIC CHAMBER OF COMMERCE EDUCATIONAL FUND: $250,000 · EducationUNITED STATES …STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $210,000 · EducationSTEPHEN SILLER…University of Idaho Foundation Inc: $200,000 · EducationUniversity of …ST LOUIS AMERICAN FOUNDATION: $163,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS FOUNDATION INC: $125,000 · Education+23 more: $480,829 · Education+23 moreAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $2,510,000 · Human ServicesAmerican Nati…NATIONAL URBAN LEAGUE INC: $375,000 · Human ServicesNATIONAL URBA…+7 more: $269,500 · Human Services+7 moreKEEP AMERICA BEAUTIFUL INC: $925,000 · EnvironmentGLASS RECYCLING FOUNDATION: $400,000 · EnvironmentRIVER NETWORK: $300,000 · EnvironmentSOIL HEALTH INSTITUTE: $200,000 · EnvironmentLIVING LANDS & WATERS: $100,000 · EnvironmentEASTERN IDAHO WATER RIGHTS COALITION INC: $75,000 · Environment+3 more: $11,000 · EnvironmentTOGETHER FOR SAFER ROADS INC: $450,000 · Public Safety & DisasterSt Louis Police Foundation: $201,000 · Public Safety & DisasterTECHNIQUES FOR EFFECTIVE ALCOHOL MANAGEMENT INCORPORATED: $150,000 · Public Safety & DisasterTHE NAPA COMMUNITIES FIREWISE FOUNDATION: $35,000 · Public Safety & Disaster+2 more: $45,000 · Public Safety & DisasterMOTHERS AGAINST DRUNK DRIVING: $750,000 · Crime & Legal
Other$10,994,305Philanthropy$6,129,907Education$3,528,829Human Services$3,154,500Environment$2,011,000Public Safety & Disaster$881,000Crime & Legal$750,000

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNITED WAY OF GREATER ST LOUIS INC: $3,157,343 over 4y, 1.6% of budgetAMERICAN ONLINE GIVING FOUNDATION INC: $2,528,564 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $2,510,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHISPANIC SCHOLARSHIP FUND: $1,200,000 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetKEEP AMERICA BEAUTIFUL INC: $925,000 over 3y, 5.2% of budgetNational Volunteer Fire Council Inc: $855,000 over 4y, 9.3% of budgetMOTHERS AGAINST DRUNK DRIVING: $750,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetURBAN LEAGUE OF METROPOLITAN ST LOUIS: $605,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $600,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUNITED NEGRO COLLEGE FUND INC: $600,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetTOGETHER FOR SAFER ROADS INC: $450,000 over 3y, 22% of budgetGLASS RECYCLING FOUNDATION: $400,000 over 3y, 70% of budgetNATIONAL URBAN LEAGUE INC: $375,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE ADVERTISING COUNCIL INC: $350,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetNEW YORK CARES INC: $300,000 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetU S Black Chamber of Commerce EDC: $300,000 over 3y, 3.9% of budgetRIVER NETWORK: $300,000 over 1y, 12% of budgetNORTH DAKOTA BARLEY COUNCIL: $285,000 over 2y, 26% of budgetYOUNG WOMEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF METROPOLITAN ST LOUIS: $251,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetWE ARE ALL HUMAN FOUNDATION: $250,000 over 2y, 6.2% of budgetASIAN AMERICANS ADVANCING JUSTICE - AAJC INC: $250,000 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetGREATER ST LOUIS INC FOUNDATION: $250,000 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetUNITED STATES HISPANIC CHAMBER OF COMMERCE EDUCATIONAL FUND: $250,000 over 2y, 4.9% of budgetCCOF FOUNDATION: $234,900 over 2y, 8.8% of budgetTHE NACS FOUNDATION: $210,000 over 2y, 10.0% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $210,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL MEDAL OF HONOR MUSEUM FOUNDATION: $210,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetSt Louis Police Foundation: $201,000 over 4y, 1.8% of budgetSOIL HEALTH INSTITUTE: $200,000 over 2y, 2.6% of budgetAMERICAN HUMANE ASSOCIATION: $200,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetHISPANIC ASSOCIATION ON CORPORATE RESPONSIBILITY: $175,000 over 3y, 1.5% of budgetST LOUIS AMERICAN FOUNDATION: $163,000 over 3y, 18% of budgetTECHNIQUES FOR EFFECTIVE ALCOHOL MANAGEMENT INCORPORATED: $150,000 over 3y, 6.9% of budgetNATIONAL SEPTEMBER 11 MEMORIAL AND MUSEUM AT THE WORLD TRADE CENTER: $150,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCONGRESSIONAL SPORTS FOR CHARITY: $130,000 over 2y, 4.9% of budgetGREATER ST LOUIS INC: $125,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetTHE BACKSTOPPERS INC FKA POLICEMEN & FIREMEN FUND OF ST LOUIS: $125,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS FOUNDATION INC: $125,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCIVIC PROGRESS INC: $125,000 over 1y, 5.1% of budgetTHE CALIFORNIA LEGISLATIVE BLACK CAUCUS POLICY INSTITUTE: $117,500 over 4y, 1.8% of budgetLIVING LANDS & WATERS: $100,000 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetNATIONAL ARCHIVES FOUNDATION: $100,000 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetAmerican Horse Council Foundation Inc: $100,000 over 2y, 33% of budgetNATIONAL CENTER FOR VICTIMS OF CRIME INC: $100,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetAgricultural Research Foundation: $100,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetFAITH AND POLITICS INSTITUTE: $100,000 over 2y, 2.7% of budgetThe Rice Foundation: $100,000 over 1y, 26% of budgetOregon State University Foundation: $80,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

St Louis Community Foundation IncMO39.5× affinity24 shared granteesties to 10 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: St Louis Community Foundation Inc · World Wide Technology Foundation · United Way of Greater St Louis Inc · St Louis Community Foundation · Moneta Group Charitable Foundation · Centene Foundation · Roman Catholic Foundation of Eastern Missouri · The Antonio V Glassberg Educational Foundation · Boniface Foundation · Millstone Foundation · Ross Family Foundation · River Network

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Anheuser-Busch Foundation Xxx-Xx-Xxxx funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Anheuser-Busch Foundation Xxx-Xx-Xxxx. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%2%8%17%30%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 10%
  • The Trustees of Princeton University: 11% of income from government
  • National Center for Victims of Crime Inc: 10% of income from government
  • Portland Gay Men's Chorus: 1% of income from government
  • Monmouth University Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Anheuser-Busch Foundation Xxx-Xx-Xxxx?

Find your warmest path to Anheuser-Busch Foundation Xxx-Xx-Xxxx through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 301 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports $6.2M of grant expense with no grantee named in the published copy. A private foundation itemizes every grant it makes, so a return carrying none has filed its list as an attachment that the public copy does not include. The figures above are therefore from FY2023, the most recent year this funder’s grantee list reached the public record.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Anheuser-Busch Foundation Xxx-Xx-Xxxx’s filings →

More from the funding graph