Skip to content
Angeles T Arredondo Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Angeles T Arredondo Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$613k
Granted FY2025still arriving
23
Grants FY2025still arriving
10
States reached
$200k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$2.4MPublic Benefit$1.8MRecreation & Sports$178kScience & Tech$60kHealth$50kCommunity Improvement$10kOther$0
02FY2025 · 23 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k8 grants · $48k
  • $10k–50k11 grants · $216k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $350k
$10,000
Median grant
10
States reached
$3.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SALESIAN HIGH SCHOOL$200,000
PROVIDENCE COLLEGE$50,000
VASSAR COLLEGE$50,000
GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY$50,000
UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT$48,246
THE URSULINE SCHOOL$27,450
SUNY BINGHAMTON$25,000
STEVENS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY$25,000
SALESIAN HIGH SCHOOL$20,000
STONY BROOK UNIVERSITY$17,505
THE CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF AMERICA$12,500
UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA$10,000
UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME$10,000
REGIS COLLEGE$10,000
VILLANOVA UNIVERSITY$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 63% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%WORCESTER OF POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE: $50k → 11%NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY: $50k → 16%VILLANOVA UNIVERSITY: $50k → 10%LEHIGH UNIVERSITY: $50k → 11%VASSAR COLLEGE: $50k → 9%CORNELL UNIVERSITY: $100k → 16%SUNY BINGHAMTON: $25k → 20%THE CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF AMERICA: $25k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN: $50k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT: $48k → 9%TRINITY COLLEGE: $25k → 11%PROVIDENCE COLLEGE: $50k → 14%GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $50k → 13%UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME: $58k → 13%PRINCETON UNIVERSITY: $50k → 11%STEVENS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $25k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT: $25k → 10%CORNELL UNIVERSITY: $50k → 16%CORPUS CHRISTI SCHOOL: $44k → 17%UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME: $50k → 13%SALESIAN HIGH SCHOOL: $200k → 9%CORPUS CHRISTI SCHOOL: $40k → 17%GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY: $50k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME: $35k → 13%SALESIAN HIGH SCHOOL: $100k → 9%CORPUS CHRISTI SCHOOL: $40k → 17%SALESIAN HIGH SCHOOL: $100k → 9%CORPUS CHRISTI SCHOOL: $38k → 17%THE HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $1.6M → 14%NEIGHBORS LINK STAMFORD: $60k → 9%SALESIAN HIGH SCHOOL: $100k → 9%CORPUS CHRISTI SCHOOL: $30k → 17%THE HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $50k → 14%ST PETER SCHOOL: $30k → 9%SALESIAN HIGH SCHOOL: $100k → 9%CORPUS CHRISTI SCHOOL: $30k → 17%THE HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $50k → 14%ST PETER SCHOOL: $30k → 9%SALESIAN HIGH SCHOOL: $100k → 9%THE HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $50k → 14%ST PETER SCHOOL: $30k → 9%SALESIAN HIGH SCHOOL: $50k → 9%THE HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $50k → 14%THE CATHOLIC ACADEMY OF STAMFORD: $35k → 9%SALESIAN HIGH SCHOOL: $50k → 9%SALESIAN HIGH SCHOOL: $50k → 9%THE HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $50k → 14%THE URSULINE SCHOOL: $27k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

VT
IL
MI
NY
MA
IN
PA
NJ
CT
RI
TN
DC
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

82%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.6M · 17 repeat orgs$784k to everyone else

17 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
25

Total granted

$3.6M
$612k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+15%
+19%

Still filing today

53%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 71% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $173k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationPublic BenefitCommunity ImprovementRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • THE HERITAGE FOUNDATION
    6× · 2017–2023 · $1.8M · revenue +63%
  • Cornell University
    2× · 2022–2023 · $150k · revenue +15%
  • VU
    VILLANOVA UNIVERSITY
    2× · 2024–2025 · $60k · revenue +6%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $60k
  • LU
    LEHIGH UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2022 · $50k · revenue +18%
  • UO
    University of Michigangraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $50k · revenue +96%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
2
President and Fellows of Harvard College

Undergraduate, graduate, and professional education and research across a broad array of academic domains.

Education
3
Western New England University

Western new england university, a comprehensive private institution with a tradition of excellence in teaching and scholarship and a commitment to service, awards undergraduate, master's, and doctoral degrees in various departments from…

Education
4
Manhattanville University

To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.

Education
5
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
6
Trustees of Dartmouth College

Dartmouth College educates the most promising students and prepares them for a lifetime of learning and of responsible leadership, through a faculty dedicated to teaching and the creation of knowledge.

Education
7
Trustees of Tufts College

Education and Research

Education
8
Seton Hall University

Seton hall university is a catholic institution of higher education

—
9
The George Washington University

The mission of the george washington university (gw) is to educate individuals in liberal arts, languages, sciences, learned professions, and other courses and subjects of study, and to conduct scholarly research and publish the findings…

Education
10
Endicott College

Endicott college offers students a vibrant academic environment that remains true to its founding principle of integrating professional and liberal arts with experiential learning. for more information see schedule o.

Education
11
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
12
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Fordham University; the most unlike its peers is University of Michigan. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

26 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 26 of the 52 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
26/26
Grantees still filing
18/26
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SALESIAN HIGH SCHOOL: $899,500 · OtherSALESIAN HIGH SCHOOLCORPUS CHRISTI SCHOOL: $232,000 · OtherCORPUS CHRISTI SCHOOLUNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT: $95,777 · OtherST PETER SCHOOL: $90,000 · Other+26 more: $611,372 · Other+26 moreTHE HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $1,800,000 · Public BenefitTHE HERITAGE FOUNDATIONUniversity of Notre Dame du Lac: $152,950 · EducationUniversity of Notre …Cornell University: $150,000 · EducationCornell UniversityVILLANOVA UNIVERSITY: $60,000 · EducationVILLANOVA UNIVERSITYGEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY: $60,000 · EducationGEORGETOWN UNIVERSIT…LEHIGH UNIVERSITY: $50,000 · EducationLEHIGH UNIVERSITYNORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY: $50,000 · EducationNORTHEASTERN UNIVERS…The Trustees of Princeton University: $50,000 · EducationThe Trustees of Prin…PROVIDENCE COLLEGE: $50,000 · EducationPROVIDENCE COLLEGETHE CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF AMERICA: $37,500 · Education+10 more: $159,069 · Education+10 moreNorthwestern University: $25,000 · Recreation & SportsJUNIOR LEAGUE OF GREENWICH CONN INC: $10,000 · Community Improvement
Other$1,928,649Public Benefit$1,800,000Education$819,519Recreation & Sports$25,000Community Improvement$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $1,800,000 over 6y, 1.3% of budgetUniversity of Notre Dame du Lac: $152,950 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCornell University: $150,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetVILLANOVA UNIVERSITY: $60,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY: $60,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLEHIGH UNIVERSITY: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Michigan: $50,000 over 1y, 15% of budgetVASSAR COLLEGE: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWORCESTER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Trustees of Princeton University: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPROVIDENCE COLLEGE: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF AMERICA: $37,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF THE STEVENS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNorthwestern University: $25,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTRINITY COLLEGE: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFordham University: $22,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $22,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCarnegie Mellon University: $19,781 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK: $19,069 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetJUNIOR LEAGUE OF GREENWICH CONN INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetVanderbilt University: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE HOWARD UNIVERSITY: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetREGIS COLLEGE: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMHERST COLLEGE TRUSTEES: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST JOHN'S UNIVERSITY NEW YORK: $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE HERITAGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds University of Notre Dame du Lac ↗
  • Who funds Cornell University ↗
  • Who funds VILLANOVA UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds LEHIGH UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds University of Michigan ↗
  • Who funds VASSAR COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds WORCESTER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds The Trustees of Princeton University ↗
  • Who funds PROVIDENCE COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds THE CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds THE TRUSTEES OF THE STEVENS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY ↗
  • Who funds Northwestern University ↗
  • Who funds TRINITY COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds Fordham University ↗
  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA ↗
  • Who funds Carnegie Mellon University ↗
  • Who funds THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK ↗
  • Who funds JUNIOR LEAGUE OF GREENWICH CONN INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Ibm International Fou…Verizon FoundationThe Bank of America C…National Philanthropi…Morgan Stanley Global…Vanguard Charitable E…Donor Advised Charita…American Online Givin…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Ibm International FoundationNY14.8× affinity5 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Ibm International Foundation · Verizon Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Angeles T Arredondo Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Angeles T Arredondo Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 6%
  • The Trustees of Princeton University: 12% of income from government
  • The Trustees of the Stevens Institute of Technology: 12% of income from government
  • Worcester Polytechnic Institute: 6% of income from government
  • Northeastern University: 4% of income from government
  • Regis College: 1% of income from government
  • Amherst College Trustees: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 52 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Angeles T Arredondo’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home