Skip to content

Louisiana · Nonprofit

ALEXANDER MILNE DEVELOPMENTAL SERVICES

ALEXANDER MILNE DEVELOPMENTAL SERVICES (Louisiana) receives grants from 10 organizations whose IRS filings report $211,479 to it, the largest being LOIS AND LLOYD HAWKINS JR FOUNDATION ($100,000). 6 of them have funded it in more than one year.

Revenue FY2025
$5.5M
Funders on record
10
Grants received
$211k
Net assets
$67M
6/10 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 1%
01What it does

What Alexander Milne Developmental Services does

Mission

We are committed to providing the highest quality care services and life experiences to our clients, allowing them to attain the optimal level of independence, self-determination, and self-fulfillment. The staff of milne treats each person with dignity compassion and respect, allowing each person to participate fully in the development and delivery of these services. We are committed to being good stewards with our resources, ensuring we provide exceptional value to our corporation, donors, and friends.

As stated on its FY2025 Form 990.

Programs

  1. Provided fourty-seven (47) developmentally challenged residents with the essential basics of life, such as housing and clothing, and also provided an atmosphere in which the residents can get an education and participate in social activities.

    $4,779,272 spent$3,724,065 earned by the program
    89% of program spending
  2. Provide breakfast, lunch, and dinner for fourty-seven (47) residents, 365 days per year. The meals that are provided are prepared on-site, and individually meet the dietary plan of each resident.

    $530,011 spent
    10% of program spending
  3. General health, medical and dental care is provided to the residents of the organization. The organization meets the needs of each resident by supplying their personal requirement of medicine and medical treatment.

    $80,595 spent
    1% of program spending

The 3 programs described on its FY2025 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $5,389,878.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($5.8M) Expenses 100 ($7.1M) Net assets 100 ($61M)2018 Revenue 117 ($6.8M) Expenses 100 ($7.1M) Net assets 89 ($54M)2019 Revenue 47 ($2.7M) Expenses 84 ($6.0M) Net assets 104 ($63M)2020 Revenue 79 ($4.6M) Expenses 89 ($6.4M) Net assets 106 ($64M)2021 Revenue 134 ($7.8M) Expenses 84 ($6.0M) Net assets 117 ($71M)2022 Revenue 132 ($7.7M) Expenses 83 ($5.9M) Net assets 105 ($64M)2023 Revenue 117 ($6.8M) Expenses 83 ($5.9M) Net assets 110 ($67M)2024 Revenue 73 ($4.2M) Expenses 85 ($6.1M) Net assets 108 ($65M)2025 Revenue 94 ($5.5M) Expenses 91 ($6.4M) Net assets 111 ($67M)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Revenue (94)Expenses (91)Net assets (111)

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2018 to 2019, from $54M to $63M (+17%).

$61M
$54M
$63M
$65M
$71M
$64M
$67M
$66M
$67M
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2017 1% · 2020 16% · 2021 8% · 2023 0% · 2025 8%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 6 of the last 9 reported years ran a deficit.

−$1.3M
’17
−$271k
’18
−$3.3M
’19
−$1.7M
’20
$1.9M
’21
$1.9M
’22
$953k
’23
−$1.8M
’24
−$974k
’25
1.5
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

Chief executive

Bridgette Miller

Executive director

As listed on its FY2025 Form 990.

The chief executive listed changed between the FY2019 and FY2020, and between the FY2023 and FY2024 filings.

'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Listed151517151313171719
Joined·+0+2+0+1+1+5+2+2
No longer listed·00231120
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 3 funders to 4 funders, grant income fell $34k → $28k.

2 of 10 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 38% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of ALEXANDER MILNE DEVELOPMENTAL SERVICES’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

ALEXANDER MILNE DEVELOPMENTAL SERVICES leans on a few funders — its largest provides 47% of grant income and the top three 93%; half comes from just 2 funders.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 2 funders to its left

46% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund ALEXANDER MILNE DEVELOPMENTAL SERVICES.

47%
largest funder
93%
top three
~3
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 74% · 2018 71% · 2019 75% · 2020 78% · 2021 74% · 2022 99% · 2023 58% — diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

50% of ALEXANDER MILNE DEVELOPMENTAL SERVICES's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 60% give in more than one year at all.

first grant+1y+2y+3y+4y+5y

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

99% of ALEXANDER MILNE DEVELOPMENTAL SERVICES's grant income comes from Louisiana funders.

NC
LA
TX

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’17
’18
’19
’20
’21
’23
Louisiana out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $80k arriving through sponsors registered in 2 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Organizations like ALEXANDER MILNE DEVELOPMENTAL SERVICES

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Louisiana

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

84% of spending goes to programs.

Program 84%Management 16%Fundraising 0%

Governance

16
board members
100%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy✓Whistleblower policy✓Document retention✓Board reviewed the 990✓Audited financials

Public support

70%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for ALEXANDER MILNE DEVELOPMENTAL SERVICES: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds ALEXANDER MILNE DEVELOPMENTAL SERVICES?
ALEXANDER MILNE DEVELOPMENTAL SERVICES (Louisiana) receives grants from 10 organizations whose IRS filings report $211,479 to it, the largest being LOIS AND LLOYD HAWKINS JR FOUNDATION ($100,000). 6 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does ALEXANDER MILNE DEVELOPMENTAL SERVICES have?
IRS filings report 10 organizations giving $211,479 in grants to ALEXANDER MILNE DEVELOPMENTAL SERVICES, 6 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of ALEXANDER MILNE DEVELOPMENTAL SERVICES?
LOIS AND LLOYD HAWKINS JR FOUNDATION is the largest funder on record, with $100,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like ALEXANDER MILNE DEVELOPMENTAL SERVICES find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Louisiana. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

Play a game about who funds Alexander Milne Developmental Services →

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 10 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 22, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing