Skip to content

· Private foundation

Andrew and Gladys Van Noord Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$800k
Granted FY2025still arriving
20
Grants FY2025still arriving
11
States reached
$170k
Largest
01What it funds
0187% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Religion$3.4MInternational$685kEducation$240kCommunity Improvement$110kCivil Rights$60kHousing & Shelter$20kPublic Benefit$15kOther$0
02FY2025 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k15 grants · $300k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $495k
$20,000
Median grant
11
States reached
$21M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GOLD AVENUE CHRISTIAN REFORMED CHURCH$170,000
PRESBYTERIAN REFORMED MINISTRIES INTERNATIONAL$145,000
MERCY SHIPS$100,000
CASCADE FELLOWSHIP CHRISTIAN REFORMED CHURCH$80,000
CALVIN UNIVERSITY$40,000
CALVIN THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY$35,000
NAVIGATORS$30,000
AFRICAN ANGEL ALLIANCE$30,000
Individual grant recipient$25,000
ALLIANCE DEFENDING FREEDOM$20,000
BILLY GRAHAM EVANGELISTIC ASSOCIATION$20,000
TIKKUN INTERNATIONAL$15,000
TURNING POINT USA$15,000
WELL VERSED$15,000
FAVOR INTERNATIONAL$15,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–25, $20k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%MATTHEW'S HOUSE MINISTRY: $10k → 11%MATTHEW'S HOUSE MINISTRY: $10k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MI
NY
CA
CO
VA
AZ
NC
OK
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$4.8M · 22 repeat orgs$15k to everyone else

22 repeat relationships: 19 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

22
1

Total granted

$4.8M
$15k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
0%

Still filing today

41%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $15k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalEducationReligionCivil RightsCommunity ImprovementHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • Mercy Ships International
    6× · 2020–2025 · $600k · revenue +126%
  • CU
    CALVIN UNIVERSITY
    6× · 2020–2025 · $240k · revenue +6%
  • PW
    PARTNERS WORLDWIDE
    3× · 2020–2022 · $110k · revenue +41%

Funded once

  • TP
    TURNING POINT USA INC
    one grant, 2025 · $15k · revenue 0%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Evangel University

Evangel is a comprehensive christian university that is committed to excellence in educating and equipping students to become spirit empowered servants of god who will impact the church and society globally.

Education
2
Cadence International

Cadence international is an evangelical mission agency dedicated to reaching the military of the united states and of the world with the good news of jesus christ. we share the gospel and our lives with the military community.

—
3
Apt Ministries

To train pastors/leaders in africa who have little or no formal training and resources. teach them how to study and prepare bible-based messages using the thompson chain reference study bible and to provide bible to trained pastors/leaders.

Religion
4
Christian Mission for the United Nations Community

Christian Mission for the United Nations Community is a ministry aimed at leading the head of every nation and other top leaders to faith in Jesus Christ and helping them to walk in dependence upon God as they discharge the…

—
5
Arizona Christian University

Arizona christian university provides a biblically-integrated, liberal arts education equipping graduates to serve the lord jesus christ in all aspects of life, as leaders of influence and excellence.

Education
6
Alliance for Transformational Ministry

Enable christian organizations worldwide to initiate and strenghten ministries that lead people to become followers of jesus and transform communities out of cycles of poverty and disease.

Religion
7
Mid-America Reformed Seminary

Mid-america reformed seminary seeks to serve the church by preparing students for gospel ministry as pastors, or those whose service to the church may be enhanced by theological education.

—
8
Jewish Voice Ministries Intl

To proclaim the gospel, grow the messianic jewish community and engage the church concerning israel and the jewish people. this is done through education, evangelism and being a movement leader, all with excellence in order to transform…

—
9
Freedom in Christ Ministries

To provide resources, training, and continuing support to leaders in the us and around the world in order that they may help others find freedom in christ.

Religion
10
Union University

Union university provides christ-centered education that promotes excellence and character development in service to church and society.

Education
11
Leadership Resources International

International missions: this organization is an international mission agency focusing on leadership development through teaching of the scriptures

Religion
12
Awakening Ministries International

Proclaim the gospel worldwide, prepare followers of jesus christ, and propel those into their god given destiny.

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Alliance Defending Freedom; the most unlike its peers is African Angel Alliance. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
4/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

GOLD AVENUE CHRISTIAN REFORMED CHURCH: $1,270,000 · OtherGOLD AVENUE CHRISTIAN REFORMED CHURCHCASCADE FELLOWSHIP CHRISTIAN REFORMED CHURCH: $480,000 · OtherCASCADE FELLOWSHIP CHRISTIAN REFORMED CHURCHTHE NAVIGATORS: $180,000 · OtherTHE NAVIGATORSCENTER FOR CHURCH RENEWAL: $140,000 · OtherCENTER FOR CHURCH RENEWALBILLY GRAHAM EVANGELISTIC ASSOCIATION: $96,000 · OtherPENSACOLA REJOICE IN THE LORD: $90,000 · Other+8 more: $294,000 · Other+8 morePRESBYTERIAN REFORMED MINISTRIES INTERNATIONAL: $885,000 · ReligionPRESBYTERIAN REFORME…Mercy Ships International: $600,000 · InternationalMercy Ships Inter…PARTNERS WORLDWIDE: $110,000 · InternationalPARTNERS WORLDWID…Favor International Inc: $25,000 · InternationalCALVIN UNIVERSITY: $240,000 · EducationCALVIN UNIV…CALVIN THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY: $230,000 · EducationCALVIN THEO…ALLIANCE DEFENDING FREEDOM: $60,000 · Civil RightsAFRICAN ANGEL ALLIANCE: $60,000 · Community ImprovementMATTHEW'S HOUSE MINISTRY: $20,000 · Human Services
Other$2,550,000Religion$885,000International$735,000Education$470,000Civil Rights$60,000Community Improvement$60,000Human Services$20,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPRESBYTERIAN REFORMED MINISTRIES INTERNATIONAL: $885,000 over 6y, 14% of budgetMercy Ships International: $600,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetCALVIN UNIVERSITY: $240,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCALVIN THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY: $230,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetPARTNERS WORLDWIDE: $110,000 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetALLIANCE DEFENDING FREEDOM: $60,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAFRICAN ANGEL ALLIANCE: $60,000 over 2y, 13% of budgetFavor International Inc: $25,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMATTHEW'S HOUSE MINISTRY: $20,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetTURNING POINT USA INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds PRESBYTERIAN REFORMED MINISTRIES INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds Mercy Ships International ↗
  • Who funds CALVIN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds CALVIN THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY ↗
  • Who funds PARTNERS WORLDWIDE ↗
  • Who funds ALLIANCE DEFENDING FREEDOM ↗
  • Who funds AFRICAN ANGEL ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds Favor International Inc ↗
  • Who funds MATTHEW'S HOUSE MINISTRY ↗
  • Who funds TURNING POINT USA INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Christian Community Foundation IncCO14.8× affinity5 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Christian Community Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Barnabas Foundation · The US Charitable Gift Trust · American Endowment Foundation · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Andrew and Gladys Van Noord Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Andrew and Gladys Van Noord Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Andrew and Gladys Van Noord’s filings →

    More from the funding graph